Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun by Geoffrey Canada

First published: 1995

Type of work: Autobiography/cultural criticism

Time of work: 1952-1995

Locale: South Bronx and Harlem, New York; Bowdoin College, Maine

Principal Personage:

  • Geoffrey Canada, an author and activist, who alternates between narrating his own life story and analyzing the culture of violence in the United States’ inner cities

Form and Content

Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun: A Personal History of Violence in America, Geoffrey Canada’s first published book, is the story of his childhood and youth in the South Bronx. As the subtitle indicates, the book also offers his perspective on the issues that have made life in U.S. inner cities increasingly dangerous for children. Ghetto life was brutal enough while Canada grew up in the 1950’s and 1960’s, as he recalls in countless painful vignettes. That violence, though, was at least governed by a code of street honor: Any show of fear would be cruelly punished, but youths were to fight fairly, and weapons were generally limited to fists, sticks, and knives—the first three words of the book’s title. A turning point came later, when guns became increasingly common on inner-city streets.

As an adult, Canada has worked to help low-income urban children escape from the cycle of poverty and indiscriminate gun violence that, since the 1970’s, has defined life for many denizens of the nation’s inner cities. He was born in 1952, the third of four brothers raised by their mother. The children’s father left the family early on. Geoffrey’s first lesson in street fighting comes when a boy steals his brother’s jacket and Mrs. Canada orders her two oldest sons to retrieve it. Mastering their fear of a possible beating from the thief, they soon return triumphantly with the jacket. For the young Canada, the primary lesson of the episode is that self-protection—through violence if necessary—is essential when not even parents can protect children adequately. Later, he comes to recognize that children often “acted violently because their parents told them to.” Parents foster self-reliance, but they also teach children “to cope by acting more violently than the others.” Thus the cycle is perpetuated.

The author grows up knowing that audacity is as important as fighting skill. Courageous youths can shake the confidence of adversaries; they also find allies and sources of protection, while cowards find no sympathy anywhere. Canada witnesses the beating of a boy who has consistently refused to fight anyone. The boy’s cries for mercy only infuriate his assailants and make his punishment worse. Canada himself, somewhat established as a street fighter, becomes the protégé of an older teenager named Mike, learning about “codes of conduct,” about sheer nerve and street-smart behavior. Under Mike’s tutelage, he is no longer “a small, helpless boy, confused and scared.” Mike “was like a knight in shining armor.”

As an adult, Canada resolves to be a “knight” for younger generations—but not to educate them in street fighting. In 1974, he graduates in social sciences from Bowdoin College, then completes a master’s degree in education at Harvard University. During his career, he leads several organizations dedicated to helping youth escape the traps of poverty and endless violence. He teaches martial arts to young people as a path to self-discipline, self-protection, and personal dignity.

At the end of Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun, Canada relates two incidents that together underscore both the urgency of the gun-violence issue and the hope of resolving it. In the first incident, his wife’s nephew dies in agony on the street, an innocent bystander in a shooting that targeted someone else. In the second, the author enjoys a time of closeness with young people in his community organization, talking with them “about values, about violence, about hope. I try to build within each one a reservoir of strength that they can draw from . . . to resist the drugs, the guns, the violence.”

Critical Context

Canada has a rare combination of traits: knowledge born of personal experience, the literary skill to tell his story effectively, and a zealous desire to make a crucial difference in children’s lives. For this reason, most critical reaction to Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun was highly favorable. Reviewers praised Canada’s straightforward, descriptive prose and his passionate advocacy for personal and systemic reform. The Christian Science Monitor, for example, described Canada’s book as “an urban coming-of-age story. Part memoir, part social reform advocacy.”

Some reviewers complained that Canada does not outline a sufficiently concrete program of reform. Actually, he does offer a detailed proposal for a government program focusing on the ubiquity of handguns, a program that includes licensing, insurance against injury, ammunition identification, and gun buybacks. In a larger context, he proposes the creation of a “peace officer corps” (not a police unit) and the adoption of measures designed to reduce the demand for drugs, the prevalence of domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, and the glamorous portrayal of violence on television and in movies. Canada has spent his adult life working with youth, bringing demonstrable results in individual lives. For this work he has received awards from numerous sources including the Heinz Family Foundation and his alma mater, Bowdoin College.

Bibliography

Bencivenga, Jim. “Telling It Like It Is.” Review of Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun, by Geoffrey Canada. Christian Science Monitor 87, no. 132 (June 5, 1995): 13. Emphasizes Canada’s perception—unusual for its time—that the absence of fathers has a negative effect on the development of boys in urban ghettoes.

Canada, Geoffrey. Review of Lanterns: A Memoir of Mentors, by Marian Wright Edelman. Black Issues Book Review 2, no. 1 (January/February, 2000): 27. In reviewing a work by one of his important mentors, Canada sheds light on the development of his own thinking. By noting Edelman’s work with Malcolm X and Medgar Evers—two martyrs of the Civil Rights movement—he underscores the perils involved.

Cohen, Leah Hager. “Mean Streets.” The New York Times Book Review, June 18, 1995, 17. Provides an update on the street situation that makes Canada’s call for action so urgent. Acknowledges the danger involved in working with children on the streets but describes it as a path of hope.

Lee, Felicia R. “For Harlem’s Children, a Catcher in the Rye.” The New York Times, January 9, 2000, section 14, p. 1. Offers a perspective on Canada’s life, his work as head of Rheedlen Centers for Children and Families in New York City, his broader efforts to help struggling children, and the long-term outlook for his projects.