Making Things Better by Anita Brookner

Excerpted from an article in Magill’s Survey of World Literature, Revised Edition

First published: 2002 (pb. in England as The Next Big Thing, 2002)

Type of work: Novel

The Work

Making Things Better opens with Julius Herz, age seventy-three, dreaming of his narcissistic cousin Fanny Bauer, whom he has romantically desired but been denied since childhood. Much of this narrative peers inside Julius’s thoughts, revealing his backstory while chronicling his present. A German exile, a frequent figure in Brookner’s fiction, Julius has lived in London since his Jewish family departed Berlin when he was fourteen during the 1930’s. A benefactor, Mr. Ostrovski, provided Julius’s parents, Willy and Trude Herz, a flat and income from his music store.

This novel’s American title is embedded in the text as Julius attempts to makes conditions tolerable by dutifully serving his controlling parents and maintaining contact with his older brother, Freddy, a gifted violinist who resides in a hospice after a mental breakdown. That exile enabled Freddy to escape his parents’ expectations. Trapped in a dreamlike existence, Julius neglects his desires, including his wife, Josie, who divorces him. Instead of seeking autonomous employment, Julius works in the music store with his father, settling into a tranquilizing routine that helps him grieve as the sole survivor after his parents’ and brother’s deaths.

Ostrovski sells the property where Julius works and lives, forcing Julius to make decisions. Julius adjusts to newfound idleness by leasing a flat and strolling to shops, galleries, and parks. As times passes, aging Julius measures life in the terms of his lease commitment, assuming he might die before renewing it. The text repeats this novel’s British title, referring to dying being the next significant event for older people.

Brookner’s choice of Julius’s German surname, Herz, meaning heart, symbolizes his geriatric concerns, both emotional and physical. He meets Josie for lunches but values her friendship rather than attempting to reconnect romantically with her. Julius is aroused by his unattainable new neighbor, Sophie Clay, a young career woman. He longs for love, particularly with Fanny. When he experiences alarming heart flutters, Julius seeks help from an aloof physician who prescribes medication and ignores Julius’s comments about Sigmund Freud. Ted Bishop, Julius’s housecleaner, shares a cautionary tale in which an elderly airline passenger experiences a dire medical situation, foreshadowing Julius’s future.

Julius goes to Paris, desiring to see a Eugène Delacroix painting that had impressed him as a young man. His memories offer revelations of freedoms he had briefly savored there in the past. At home, he gets rid of heirlooms, particularly family photographs. After not communicating with him for years, Fanny sends Julius letters, pleading for him to help her with legal troubles. Provoked, Julius responds, telling Fanny she is self-centered and should read Thomas Mann’s Buddenbrooks (1901; English translation, 1924), which examines family relationships. Destroying those angry notes, Julius mails kinder messages, suggesting they retreat to Beau Rivage, the Swiss hotel where he had unsuccessfully proposed to Fanny thirty years earlier. As Julius, wholeheartedly pursuing his desires instead of submitting to others, prepares to board the airplane, he ironically suffers an attack, accidentally dropping and stepping on his heart pills. Julius moves forward, his fate and destination unclear, to experience the next significant phase of his life, either his demise or his renewal.

Review Sources

The Atlantic Monthly 291, no. 3 (April 1, 2003): 109.

Booklist 99, no. 5 (November 1, 2002): 450.

The Christian Science Monitor, January 1-2, 2003, p. 13.

Kirkus Reviews 70, no. 21 (November 1, 2002): 1548.

Library Journal 128, no. 1 (January 1, 2003): 151.

The London Review of Books, June 27, 2002, p. 30.

Los Angeles Times, January 22, 2003, p. E11.

New Leader 85, no. 6 (November/December, 2002): 44-45.

The New York Times Book Review, February 2, 2003, p. 17.

Publishers Weekly 249, no. 51 (December 23, 2002): 47.

The Times Literary Supplement, June 21, 2002, p. 24.

The Washington Post, January 12, 2003, p. T2.