Research proposal
A research proposal is a formal document that outlines an individual or organization's plan and capability to conduct a specific research project. This type of proposal can serve various purposes, including applications for graduate programs, funding requests for academic projects, or bids for market research contracts. Given the diverse contexts in which research proposals are utilized, there is no standardized format; writers tailor their proposals based on the specific requirements and expectations of the intended audience. Key components typically include an introduction that articulates the research question and its significance, a literature review that demonstrates familiarity with existing knowledge and debates, and a detailed methodology section outlining the research process. The quality of the methodology is particularly crucial, as it provides a basis for evaluating the proposal's rigor. Additionally, when seeking funding, it is essential to present a thorough budget analysis and adhere to submission guidelines. Effective communication and proofreading are also vital to ensure clarity and professionalism in the proposal. Overall, a well-structured research proposal is essential for successfully securing approval or funding in the competitive landscape of research.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Research proposal
A research proposal is a document used by an individual, group, or organization to detail their ability and intention to complete a specific task of research. It might be used by a student wishing to be accepted into a graduate level course, by an academic wishing to obtain funding for a particular project, or a market research company tendering for a contract offered by a private or public sector organization. Since there is such a wide range of situations in which a research proposal might be used, it is not surprising that there is not one single set format for the document. Instead, proposal writers (who may be full-time or freelance specialists in this field) will carefully assess the requirements of the particular situation and structure the document according to the perception of what the recipient most requires and values. To obtain a better understanding of the proposal’s purpose, it is helpful to establish a personal relationship with the person or group responsible for judging the proposals. However, this can become problematic in some cases; a strong relationship could be construed as a form of corruption.
Overview
Although there is considerable variation in the situations in which an academic research proposal might be required, certain features are likely to be common. The first of these is an introductory section that explains why the proposed research subject is important and states the research question in simple, declarative terms. This might be followed by specific hypotheses or propositions that define the project’s scope. Additional issues that might be included in this section are definitions of important terms, acknowledgement of any limitations, and assumptions.
The next important section is likely to be a literature review, which may be divided into separate sections. The purpose of the literature review is for applicants to demonstrate that they are sufficiently knowledgeable and aware of the issues regarding their topic. They do this by indicating that they have read or are aware of the important reference works in the proposed field. In the case of the sciences, the literature may be based on data that are objective and universal and, hence, without controversy. The purpose of the literature review in such a case is to outline what has already been established with a view to showing what the researcher can add to existing knowledge. However, in the case of the social sciences or arts, it is more likely that there are competing theories or paradigms that are fiercely contested by various intellectuals. In such cases, the literature review should be used to demonstrate awareness of the controversies and reasons put forward to support why one perspective is adopted over another. The danger in these cases is that the recipient of the proposal may adhere to a different position and allocate the research funds accordingly.
Within the literature review, the applicant should be careful to highlight past studies in the same field to help define the contribution to knowledge that will be made.
The third important section is the methodology section. Since the nature and scope of research projects vary so widely, it can be difficult to compare them directly. However, the quality of the methodology section can be compared directly and used to judge the overall quality of the proposal. Hence, it is often the most important section. It should outline, in as much detail as possible, the way in which the research will be conducted and why that method was chosen, who will be involved with which tasks, and how quality assurance will be conducted. Issues such as questionnaire development, pilot testing, sampling, non-response bias, and language interpretation might all be relevant here.
Additional sections to include might be a projected timetable of events and the dates when certain deliverables are due. In cases where funding is being sought, it will be necessary to provide a close analysis of how the money will be spent and the accounting procedures employed.
Some experts have also outlined several tips for writing a winning research proposal when the search for funding is competitive, often stressing the importance of doing preparatory research on the funding agency and its priorities to see what it would be interested in funding and whether one’s research topic would be a good match. When responding to an agency’s request for proposal (RFP), it is vital to follow the instructions exactly and to check for updates in case the deadlines or other submission information has been updated. Proposals should be proofread to ensure they are clearly written and free of spelling and grammatical errors. It has also been recommended that the writer find a colleague to review the content of the proposal before submitting it.
Bibliography
Best, John, and James Kahn. Research in Education. 10th ed., Pearson, 2005.
De Jong, Jean Philippe, et al. “Ethical Review from the Inside: Repertoires of Evaluation in Research Ethics Committee Meetings.” Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 34, no. 7, 2012, pp. 1039–52.
How to Write a Good Postgraduate Research Proposal. The University of Edinburgh, 2024, www.ed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/atoms/files/howtowriteproposal2024‗0.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept. 2024.
"How to Write a Research Proposal." University of Sheffield, www.sheffield.ac.uk/academic-skills/study-skills-online/how-write-research-proposal. Accessed 12 Sept. 2024.
Li, Ping, and Karen Marrongelle. “Preparing Your Proposal.” Having Success with NSF: A Practical Guide. Wiley, 2012.
Locke, Lawrence F., et al. Proposals That Work: A Guide for Planning Dissertations and Grant Proposals. Sage, 2014.
Matthews, Mark. “Tips for a Winning Research Proposal.” ASEE Prism, Sept. 2014, www.asee-prism.org/tips-for-a-winning-research-proposal/. Accessed 12 Sept. 2024.
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. “Writing a Research Proposal: The Role of Library Anxiety, Statistics Anxiety, and Composition Anxiety.” Library and Information Science Research, vol. 19, no. 1, 1997, pp. 5–33.
Sandelowski, Margarete, et al. “Artful Design: Writing the Proposal for Research in the Naturalist Paradigm.” Research in Nursing and Health, vol. 12, no. 2, 1989, pp. 77–84.
Schindler, Pamela S. Business Research Methods. 14th ed., McGraw, 2022.