Wolf by Osip Mandelstam
"Wolf" is a poem by Osip Mandelstam that consists of sixteen lines organized into four quatrains. Written in the spring of 1931, it is considered a central work within a group of poems known as the "Wolf cycle," which explore similar themes. The poem is highly autobiographical, reflecting Mandelstam's personal struggles and societal observations during a turbulent period in late 1920s and early 1930s Russia.
Thematically, the title suggests elements of predation and danger, as the speaker grapples with his place in a society that imposes hardship and cruelty. The poem opens with a reflection on the poet’s sacrifices for a higher purpose, while introducing feelings of threat symbolized by the "wolfhound age." The speaker expresses a desire for compassion and escape from the harsh realities around him, longing for tranquility amidst the beauty of nature. This contrast between the serene Siberian landscape and the brutal conditions of human existence is poignant throughout the poem.
Mandelstam employs rich imagery and metaphor, notably using the wolf as a symbol of the predatory aspects of modern life, which he intentionally distances himself from. The poem’s structure and rhythmic quality enhance its musicality, though the depth of its meaning is often lost in translation. Ultimately, "Wolf" is a powerful exploration of identity, struggle, and the hope for understanding amidst societal challenges.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Wolf by Osip Mandelstam
First published: 1964, as “Za gremuchuyu doblest’ gryadushchikh vekov,” in Sobranie sochinenii; English translation collected as “For the sake of the future’s trumpeting heroics” in Selected Poems, 1974; as “Wolf” in The Eyesight of Wasps, 1988
Type of poem: Lyric
The Poem
“Wolf” is a short poem of sixteen lines divided into four quatrains. It is one of several poems written in the spring of 1931 on the same theme; they are considered by some literary historians to be variants of the same poem and are therefore known as the “Wolf cycle,” “Wolf” being the central poem. Written in the first person and in the present tense, it is, like many of Osip Mandelstam’s verses, highly autobiographical. In order to interpret the poem correctly, circumstances of Mandelstam’s life in the late 1920’s and early 1930’s must be taken into account. From the events of Mandelstam’s life at this time, it is certain that the poet and the persona are identical.
![Osip Mandelstam, Russian writer, 1914 By Photographer unknown, uploader Koperczak (talk) 18:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons poe-sp-ency-lit-267703-145674.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/poe-sp-ency-lit-267703-145674.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
The title suggests a predator and, consequently, a danger to the persona. The poem opens with an assessment of the poet’s position in society and history. He avers that for the sake “of the future’s trumpeting heroics” and of “that exalted tribe,” he has deliberately deprived himself of the merriment and honor at his “fathers’ feast.” Without specifically naming the “exalted tribe” or his fathers, he dwells on the degree of and reason for his sacrifice. This becomes clearer in the second stanza, in which he complains that “The wolfhound age” has jumped on his shoulders, thus introducing a feeling of mortal danger to the poet. In the next line, he hastens to add that he is not a wolf by blood, indicating that he is not in the same league with the forces oppressing him. Instead, he pleads for understanding and compassion, suggesting that he would wish to be tucked into the sleeve of a Siberian fur coat like a hat. However, the warmth and security of a fur coat are not the main reasons for his wish to be transported far away.
In the third stanza, he openly says that he does not want to witness “the snivelling, nor the sickly smears,” or, more ominously, “the bloody bones on the wheel.” Thus, another motif is introduced, that of the cruelty and inhumanity of man to man. Rather than witnessing all those undignified acts or, even less, participating in them, he would prefer the serenity of the Siberian nights and the blue foxes shining all night as they did in primeval times. In the last stanza, the poet pleads again to be taken to a distant region where a peaceful river, the Yenisey, flows and the pines reach to the stars, avowing again that he is not a wolf by blood. The repetition reinforces the importance of the statement to the poet. At the very end, he declares defiantly that only an equal can kill him, specifically introducing the final motif of death. The last two statements disassociate him from the events around him and express defiance, even courage, in the face of mortal danger.
Forms and Devices
The poem is written in a conventional style typical of Russian poetry of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It is rhymed abab with twelve-syllable lines alternating with nine-syllable lines, resulting in a distinct, strong rhythm and a highly musical quality, which, unfortunately and perhaps inevitably, is not fully reproduced in translation. The two most striking devices used by Mandelstam are images and metaphors. The first image that strikes the reader’s eye is the cup at the feast. Although the image itself is not ambiguous, its significance is somewhat unclear. It is also not clear of whose glory the poet speaks or to what “exalted tribe” he refers. Yet there is no doubt that a feast is taking place. Speaking of his preferences, Mandelstam uses a powerful image of a hat tucked into a sleeve of a fur coat of the Siberian steppes, which suggests warmth, security, aloofness, and beauty. The beauty of a peaceful river flowing through the steppes of Siberia is enhanced by the images of blue foxes shining in the night amid primeval snow by tall pine trees reaching out to the stars. These beautiful images are contrasted to “the snivelling…sickly smears” of the poet’s surroundings, which he is forced to endure and from which he would rather escape.
There are fewer metaphors, but one of them occupies a central position. It is the so-called mother metaphor: the wolf. It stands not so much for a wolf in nature as it does for a bloodthirsty predator underlying the beastly nature of modern existence in the persona’s society. This is clear from the word Mandelstam uses, volkodav, which does not mean simply a wolf but a wolf-dog or wolfhound, corresponding to the nature of the times depicted. Mandelstam extends the metaphor by refusing to identify with it, thus placing it in a sharper focus. Another metaphor, “bloody bones in the wheel,” is even more drastic. It stands for the oppressive, torturous age in which the persona lives and for the force of a turning wheel that grinds on inexorably and, like fate, cannot easily be stopped or escaped. Thus, by reinforcing the metaphor introduced in the second stanza (“wolf”) and by repeating the salient phrase (“I’m no wolf by blood”), Mandelstam creates a powerful sequence of images and metaphors that support and sharpen the quintessence of the poem.