Horse slaughter
Horse slaughter refers to the practice of killing horses specifically for human consumption of their meat. This practice is commonplace in several countries, including Belgium, France, Italy, and Japan, where horsemeat is considered a delicacy. However, it remains highly controversial and taboo in nations like the United States and Britain, where horses are often viewed as companions or valued assets rather than livestock. The roots of these cultural attitudes can be traced back to historical contexts, religious beliefs, and evolving perceptions of horses over time.
The horse slaughter debate has intensified in the United States, particularly since the closure of domestic slaughterhouses in 2007 due to legislative actions that effectively banned inspections necessary for meat processing. While some states have enacted laws prohibiting horse slaughter, proponents argue that such bans harm horse owners by decreasing the animals' market value, leading to neglect and abandonment issues. In contrast, animal rights advocates highlight concerns over the humane treatment of horses and the potential health risks associated with consuming horsemeat, given the unregulated chemicals that some horses may be exposed to throughout their lives. The discussion continues to evoke strong opinions from diverse perspectives, reflecting the complexities surrounding horse slaughter and its implications for society.
Subject Terms
Horse slaughter
Horse slaughter is the process of killing horses with the specific intent of using their meat for human consumption. Many countries, including Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, and Switzerland, commonly consume horsemeat. However, the consumption of horsemeat carries a strong taboo in many other nations, such as the United States and Britain. Many animal rights groups actively campaign for the abolishment of horse slaughter. However, businesses, such as slaughterhouses and some restaurants, assert that horse slaughter should be legal and socially accepted worldwide.
History of Humans and Horses
Anthropologists believe that humans have eaten horsemeat for as long as they have been able to hunt horses. Evidence shows that modern humans' ancestors hunted and ate horses more than four-hundred thousand years ago. Additionally, cave paintings and carvings from tens of thousands of years ago depict horses as prey. This evidence suggests that humans commonly hunted herds of wild horses and ponies for meat until horses were domesticated between three thousand and six thousand years ago.
Evidence also shows that horses would have been incredibly difficult for early humans to domesticate. Because horses are fear-driven animals, they most likely evolved to view humans as predators. Experts believe humans probably accomplished domestication of these animals by killing mother horses and raising offspring themselves. Young horses raised among humans probably would have lost their fear of humans, making them easier to domesticate. After the captured, tame horses were grown, humans then bred them. Fossilized horse skeletons suggest that humans selectively bred horses for domestic labor more than two thousand years ago. They used domesticated horses for transportation and labor, making them central to many nomadic societies. Nomadic societies also used domesticated horses for milk and meat. The descendants of nomadic tribes in Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan, and many other places continue to practice these traditions today.
Cultural taboos against eating horsemeat developed for a variety of reasons. To distance Christians from the common pagan ritual of horse sacrifice, Pope Gregory III banned eating horsemeat in 732 CE. Additionally, the Old Testament of the Bible declares horses unclean and unfit to eat, making it forbidden in Jewish culture. Early on, Britain and the United States viewed horse slaughter negatively. They considered horsemeat the food of poor farmers who had to eat their draft animals to avoid starving.
Modern taboos against horsemeat stem from different sources. Psychologists attribute the taboo against eating horsemeat to the changing role of horses in society. As people bred horses for transportation, war, and farm work, they began to consider these animals as distant parts of the family, companions, or valued assets. This made the idea of eating horses uncomfortable to many people; some felt it was closer to cannibalism than eating other livestock. Historically, however, even societies with taboos against the consumption of horsemeat sometimes embraced the practice in times of food scarcity. For example, when other types of meats were heavily rationed during the two world wars, the United States maintained a thriving horsemeat market. Once other meats returned to the market, the demand for horsemeat almost entirely dissipated.
Modern Controversy
Horse slaughter resurfaced as a controversial topic in the United States in the twenty-first century. Due to cultural bias and animal rights activism, US legislators made horse slaughter functionally illegal from 2007 to 2011. Congress dropped all funding for inspections of horsemeat processing facilities. Because of the stringent inspection requirements for butchering facilities in America, slaughterhouses could not remain open without government-funded inspections. When President Barack Obama's administration failed to renew the legislation that withheld government funding for inspections of horsemeat processing facilities, the controversy over the topic began again. While the last horse slaughterhouse in the United States closed in 2007, horses from America were routinely shipped to Canada and Mexico to be slaughtered. As of 2024, a federal ban on horse slaughter did not exist in the United States. However, the Save America's Forgotten Equines (SAFE) Act was introduced to Congress in 2023. If passed into law, the ban would end horse slaughter in the United States and end the transport of horses from the United States to other countries for slaughter. In the interim, individual states had the power to end horse slaughter within their boundaries. By 2024, horse slaughter had become illegal in California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Texas.
Proponents of horse slaughter insist that the ban on using horses for meat is detrimental to horse owners in many unforeseen ways. They argue that the ban significantly drops the value of horses in the United States, sometimes to as low as fifty dollars. This leads to the abandonment of many horses, which are expensive and difficult to maintain properly. Advocates also argue that many people who no longer view the horse as valuable have euthanized their animals and blame these deaths on the horsemeat ban. Lastly, they say that the ban is wasteful. They claim that the meat of deceased horses should be utilized as a low-priced food option.
Protesters of horse slaughter often argue that their opponents' arguments are not supported by most statistics. The target consumers for horsemeat were never in the United States but in Canada and Mexico. While shipping horses to these countries is undoubtedly more expensive than slaughtering them in the United States, protesters assert that the value of horses has been impacted much less than their opponents claim. Protesters also assert that horses are sometimes fed or injected with various unregulated chemicals throughout their lives, making their meat unsafe for human consumption. Lastly, they insist that the process of slaughtering itself is overly cruel to the horses. They argue that in a world where many other food options exist, humans have no reason to cause undue suffering to other living things.
The most common slaughtering processes involve firing an air-powered bolt gun at the head of the animal, causing brain damage and rendering it insensible without damaging the brain stem. As long as the brain stem is intact, the animal's heart continues to beat, and it continues to breathe. This makes processing the animal easier without risk of spoiling the meat. However, opponents claim that the area of a horse's skull that would need to be hit to render the animal completely insensible is small, difficult to find, and may vary between horses. They argue that the process can cause severe brain damage and partially incapacitate the animal but fail to stop the horse from feeling pain while being slaughtered.
Bibliography
Genaro, Teresa. "The Ethics of Horsemeat." Forbes. Forbes, Inc. 13 Mar. 2013, www.forbes.com/sites/teresagenaro/2013/03/13/the-ethics-of-horsemeat/. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.
Roberson, Claire. "What Is the Safe Act?" Animal Equality, 15 Aug. 2024, animalequality.org/blog/2024/08/15/what-is-the-safe-act/. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.
Sulzberger, A.G. "Slaughter of Horses Goes On, Just Not in U.S." New York Times. New York Times Company. 23 Oct. 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/10/24/us/Horse-Slaughter-Stopped-in-United-States-Moves-Across-Borders.html?pagewanted=all&‗r=0. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.
Weber, Klaus, et al. "A Review of Horses Sent to Slaughter for Human Consumption: Impact of Horsemeat Consumption, Residual Banned Drugs, and Public Health Risks." American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), vol. 84, no. 3, 256 Jan. 2023, avmajournals.avma.org/view/journals/ajvr/84/3/ajvr.22.10.0185.xml. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.
Wiser, Christen. "Detailed Discussion of Horse Slaughter for Human Consumption." Animal Legal & Historical Center. Michigan State University College of Law. 2013, www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-horse-slaughter-human-consumption. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.