"No Taxation Without Representation" slogan
"No Taxation Without Representation" was a political slogan that emerged in colonial America during the 1760s as a response to perceived injustices in taxation imposed by Great Britain. The phrase is largely attributed to Massachusetts lawyer James Otis, who argued that it was tyrannical to tax a population that lacked representation in the British Parliament. This sentiment was notably intensified by the Stamp Act of 1765, which imposed a direct tax on colonists requiring them to purchase specially stamped paper for legal documents and publications.
The colonists believed that only their own legislatures had the authority to tax them, and they organized against these taxes through various forms of protest, including the Stamp Act Congress, which asserted their grievances formally to the British government. As British authorities continued to impose taxes without colonial consent, tensions escalated, leading to boycotts and further acts of defiance, such as the Boston Tea Party. Ultimately, the slogan encapsulated a critical aspect of the colonial struggle for autonomy and representation, contributing significantly to the rising sentiment for independence that culminated in the American Revolutionary War. The phrase remains a historical symbol of the fight against perceived governmental overreach.
On this Page
Subject Terms
"No Taxation Without Representation" slogan
"No taxation without representation" was a colonial American political slogan. It arose in the 1760s as an angry reaction to what Americans believed was Great Britain's unfair attempt to tax the colonists without permitting them representation in the British Parliament. The phrase itself is generally attributed to Massachusetts lawyer James Otis, who, like many other Americans at the time, was outraged that British authorities believed they could tax a people who wielded no political power to refuse to pay.
The Stamp Act of 1765 in particular infuriated the colonists. Unlike a tax on goods, this was a direct tax on the colonists, who were being forced to buy paper products issued with royally approved stamps. American colonists met later that year at the Stamp Act Congress, where they declared in formal letters to the British government that the American people could be taxed only if they enjoyed representation in Parliament. More taxes followed over the next decade, however, increasingly angering American proponents of the no taxation without representation principle. In 1776, Americans who did not wish for Britain to control them anymore declared the United States a sovereign nation.
Background
The phrase "no taxation without representation" was likely coined by lawyer James Otis of Boston in the early 1760s. The concept itself references a government taxing its people but not empowering them with the right to vote against such taxation. The word representation refers to the presence of the people's representatives in the legislature that passes tax laws.
This idea became relevant to American colonists in the mid-1760s, following Britain's victory in the Seven Years' War (1756–1763). The war had seen Britain push its rival of France mostly out of North America. The war had been costly, and the British government needed to recoup its finances. British leaders saw the war as a defense of the American colonies from French attacks, and the British government intended to station more army troops in the colonies as protection from Native Americans. Therefore, to British parliamentarians, the American people should help to reimburse the British government for its expenses involving the colonies.
Britain's Stamp Act of 1765 was the first tax to arouse American ire. Britain had taxed imports and exports in the colonies for decades, and Americans largely agreed that Parliament retained the right to regulate the colonial economies this way. The Stamp Act was different in that it was not a duty on trade goods but rather a direct tax on the colonists themselves. The law stipulated that Americans had to pay a small fee to obtain paper bearing a new royal stamp. Newspapers, legal documents, and other products had to be printed on this stamped paper.
The price of the stamped paper was relatively inexpensive for colonists; American legal minds objected to the act for a different reason. Informed Americans believed that only their colonial legislatures could tax the people for the purpose of raising money. To them, Britain could not do this because the American people were not permitted representation in the British Parliament. The colonists worried that the Stamp Act was the first in a series of British taxes that would ignore this legal principle by taxing Americans for revenue.
Overview
At this point, Americans realized the importance of voicing their displeasure with the tax to Britain directly. Their rallying cry after the passage of the Stamp Act became a phrase uttered by the radical Boston lawyer James Otis, who claimed that taxation without representation was tyranny. Those words had come from speeches Otis had given publicly. In 1764, he expounded upon this idea when he wrote in the pamphlet "Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved" that taxing a people who had no say in their own government was an infringement upon liberty itself and would ultimately remove every civil right enjoyed by that people.
"No taxation without representation" therefore became a slogan adopted by opponents of the Stamp Act, especially by those Americans who assembled for the Stamp Act Congress in New York City in October 1765. The congress drafted the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, in which the delegates declared that British taxes passed on the colonies without the colonists' consent were unlawful. The declaration further stated that Britain had no right to punish violators of the Stamp Act with jury-less trials.
The Declaration of Rights and Grievances had no effect on British leaders, although mounting American protests—led by the underground organization the Sons of Liberty, whose motto was none other than "no taxation without representation"—against the Stamp Act forced Parliament to repeal it in 1766. Along with the repeal, Parliament passed the Declaratory Act, which stated that the British government still possessed the right to tax the colonies in any manner it chose.
More trouble followed in 1767 with Parliament's passing of the Townshend Acts, which imposed import taxes on glass, paper, tea, and other products. The colonists' taxes would be used to pay the salaries of the royally appointed governors of the colonies. Additionally, a body of customs commissioners would be sent to the colonies to enforce the law. As with the Stamp Act, Americans protested the Townshend Acts as a British abuse of power, yet another example of Britain taxing the colonies without allowing them parliamentary representation. Various colonies started boycotting British goods in response. Parliament partially repealed the Townshend Acts in 1770, keeping the tax on tea.
American-British relations deteriorated further into the 1770s with the passing of the 1773 Tea Act, which granted the British East India Company a monopoly on American tea. Americans displayed their anger over the act by staging what became known as the Boston Tea Party, during which Americans dumped crates of British tea into Boston Harbor. Britain retaliated with the Coercive Acts of 1774, known in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts. The laws closed Boston Harbor to trade and imposed British military control of Massachusetts.
In 1775, years of American outrage at Britain's taxation policies and other measures the colonists considered despotic resulted in the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War (1775–1783). Following the American Revolution, the slogan "no taxation without representation" continued to recall one of the leading reasons for colonial Americans' war of independence against their mother country of Great Britain.
Bibliography
Erb, Kelly Phillips. "No Taxation without Representation and Other Reasons America Declared Independence." Forbes, 4 July 2017, www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2017/07/04/no-taxation-without-representation-and-other-reasons-america-declared-independence/#447eb33c4f8a. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"9d. The Townshend Acts." USHistory.org, www.ushistory.org/us/9d.asp. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"On the Day: 'No Taxation without Representation!'" National Constitution Center, 7 Oct. 2016, constitutioncenter.org/blog/250-years-ago-today-no-taxation-without-representation/. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"1775: Patrick Henry Voices American Opposition to British Policy." History.com, 2010, www.history.com/this-day-in-history/patrick-henry-voices-american-opposition-to-british-policy. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"1769: Washington Criticizes 'Taxation without Representation,'" History.com, 2009, www.history.com/this-day-in-history/washington-criticizes-taxation-without-representation. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"Stamp Act." History.com, 2009, www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/stamp-act. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"A Summary of the 1765 Stamp Act." Colonial Williamsburg, www.history.org/history/teaching/tchcrsta.cfm. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"Taxation without Representation." InvestingAnswers, www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/laws-regulations/taxation-without-representation-4570. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"Taxation without Representation." Investopedia, www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tax‗without‗representation.asp. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.
"10a. Stamp Act Congress." USHistory.org, www.ushistory.org/us/10a.asp. Accessed 17 Jan. 2018.