Race-neutrality
Race-neutrality refers to the concept of making decisions and policies without regard to racial considerations, with the aim of treating all individuals equally regardless of their race or ethnicity. Advocates of race-neutrality argue that society should move towards a framework where race does not influence choices in areas such as employment, education, and legislation, positing that a truly democratic society should eliminate racial stereotypes and avoid preferential treatment based on race. This perspective has gained traction particularly in the United States, where some have pushed to end affirmative action programs, believing that the nation is becoming "color-blind" and that equal opportunity alone suffices for justice among all racial and ethnic groups.
However, critics of this approach contend that race and racism still significantly impact social dynamics and that ignoring these factors can undermine efforts to achieve genuine equality. They argue that a race-neutral stance can serve as a barrier to addressing structural and systemic racism, which continues to affect marginalized communities. This debate highlights a broader discussion on how best to achieve social justice, with some experts advocating for policies that consider the intersection of race and class to better address disparities, particularly seen in areas like the criminal justice system. The discourse surrounding race-neutrality reflects complex societal views on race, equality, and justice, making it a critical topic in contemporary discussions about civil rights and social policy.
On this Page
Race-neutrality
In the United States, overt racism has been on the decline since the 1940s. Most anthropologists and biologists now avoid classifying people into races. Although genetic differences among population groups do exist in the form of phenotypes (outward characteristics such as skin color, eye color, or hair types), these differences have not been shown to be significant at the basic level of molecular DNA (genes) and hence do not affect personality, intelligence, or any ability that significantly relates to social behavior. Therefore, the social significance of race is limited to how the members of a society draw unwarranted conclusions from the physical differences between peoples, meaning that race is a social construct.
Because democracy is evidenced not only by the legal framework of the United States Constitution but also by the real relations among the people governed by that law, social justice dictates that in a true democracy, the role of race should be ignored when choices and decisions that matter to everyone are made. True race-neutrality means eliminating racial stereotypes and banning any preferential treatment on the basis of race. In a race-neutral United States, equal opportunity and equal justice for all should, some argue, be sufficient to protect the rights of all races and ethnic origins without resorting to any form of race-conscious public policy. As a result, in the 1990s, many members of the United States Congress and state legislators began a movement to terminate affirmative action programs on the basis that the United States was approaching race-neutrality, or becoming a “color-blind” nation. Others argue that race and racism continue to have indelible impacts on social justice and that the notion of a race-neutral society, at least for any foreseeable future, is a smokescreen used by those who wish to put an end to equal-opportunity programs. To address structural, systemic racism, some experts assert that litigators must consider the intersection of race and class when creating politics—for example, the disproportionate number of Black Americans in the criminal justice system.
Bibliography
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. 6th ed., Rowman, 2022.
Chapman, Thandeka K. “You Can’t Erase Race! Using CRT to Explain the Presence of Race and Racism in Majority White Suburban Schools.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 34, no. 4, 2013, pp. 611–27.
Choi, Jung-ah. “Unlearning Colorblind Ideologies in Education Class.” Educational Foundations, vol. 22, no. 3-4, 2008, pp. 53–71.
Fitzgerald, Kathleen J. Recognizing Race and Ethnicity: Power, Privilege, and Inequality. 4th ed., Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.
Maye, Adewale A. "The Myth of Race-Neutral Policy." Economic Policy Institute, 15 June 2023, www.epi.org/publication/the-myth-of-race-neutral-policy. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024.
Mitchell, W. J. T. Seeing through Race. Harvard UP, 2012.
Powell, Cedric Merlin. "Critiquing Neutrality: Critical Perspectives on Schools, the First Amendment, and Affirmative Action in a 'Post-Racial' World." University of Louisville Law Review, vol. 52, no. 1, 2013, pp. 105–11.
Wise, Tim. Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity. City Lights, 2010.