National Security Decision Directive 84

Declared: March 11, 1983

Place: Washington, D.C.

Significance: This declaration extended to all federal government agencies the same strict restrictions on disclosure of classified information that previously applied to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

Ronald Reagan won election to the presidency in 1980 by presenting himself as a citizen-politician, an outsider sent to Washington to restore government to its proper path. He and his conservative followers believed that both the media and agencies of the executive branch controlled by their liberal opponents were anxious to undermine the Republican administration’s conservative programs. The Reagan Administration saw evidence of such hostility in the many “leaks” of government documents to the press—even though many of those complaining about such disclosures were believed to be among the biggest document leakers.

102082332-101903.jpg

The administration issued NSDD 84 in response to a report by an interagency committee formed in 1982 by Attorney General William French Smith. The committee, which had representatives from the CIA and the departments of State and Defense, said that unauthorized disclosure of classified information was damaging U.S. national security interests. The directive required government employees to report all their media contacts to their agencies. It also mandated that all suspected leaks be formally investigated, and it authorized using polygraph tests in such probes.

NSDD 84 affected nearly four million persons, more than a million of whom were employed by private defense contractors. The directive also required more than 290,000 government employees who had access to certain levels of classified material to sign nondisclosure agreements requiring them to submit for clearance any lectures that they planned to give, or any articles or books—including fiction—that they wished to publish.

NSDD 84 caused an uproar among journalists, federal employee unions, civil liberties groups, and members of Congress. Critics resented the fact that such directives set government policies without going through normal legislative processes, and that they—unlike executive orders—did not have to be published in the Federal Register. These opponents feared that the reporting of media contacts and polygraph testing would lead to infringement of the rights of freedom of speech and of privacy. The prepublication review process raised questions of prior restraint and censorship.

In September, 1984, under pressure from Congress, the administration suspended NSDD 84’s prepublication review provision, but left in place a 1981 requirement that all government employees with high-level security clearance sign contracts holding them to lifetime promises to submit material for prepublication review. A 1986 congressional study found that suspension of the NSDD 84’s prepublication review requirement did not end censorship. In 1984 alone 21,718 books, articles, speeches, and other materials were submitted for agency prepublication review; a thousand more were submitted in 1985. By December 31, 1985, more than 240,000 persons had signed the agreement, in either its 1981 or 1983 version.