Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and climate change
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are private, nonprofit entities that focus on social, political, and environmental issues. In the context of climate change, NGOs play a significant role in advocating for vulnerable populations, especially in developing countries that face disproportionate impacts from climate-related disasters such as floods and droughts. As climate change intensifies, many NGOs are working to highlight the inequalities between wealthy and impoverished nations, where the latter often bear the brunt of environmental degradation despite contributing the least to greenhouse gas emissions.
NGOs leverage their global networks to lobby for effective climate policies, promote environmental justice, and provide support for adaptation and mitigation strategies. They often engage in public awareness campaigns, disaster preparedness, and capacity building among local communities. Additionally, NGOs advocate for alternative livelihoods to help those affected by climate change and work to secure funding for initiatives aimed at enhancing resilience in vulnerable regions.
Despite their essential contributions, NGOs face challenges, including government interference, funding dependencies, and questions about their legitimacy and governance. Local NGOs, in particular, express concerns regarding the influence of larger international NGOs, fearing that it may undermine their ability to address local issues effectively. Overall, NGOs are diverse in their approaches and priorities, reflecting a wide range of strategies to combat the effects of climate change while addressing the needs of affected communities.
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and climate change
Definition
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are broadly defined as private, philanthropic, and nonprofit organizations that aim to provide services for needy people and to challenge sociopolitical inequalities at local, national, or international levels. Oxfam, Greenpeace, the Red Cross, Save the Children, and Doctors Without Borders are a few high-profile NGOs that have been active in shaping climate change policies.
Significance for Climate Change
An increasing number of NGOs have shown their growing interest and influence in putting the environment on the global agenda and pressuring governments, businesses, and international organizations to take climate change seriously. Climate change affects both developed and developing countries, but many NGOs pay extra attention to the needs of vulnerable groups in developing countries since the climate-change-induced destruction falls disproportionately on them. These impoverished people rely heavily on natural resources, such as land and sea, for survival, but climate change would cause more floods, droughts, and extreme weather, and that will destroy their livelihoods and worsen poverty. However, the adaptive capacity of developing countries is low, and their governments are not strong enough to respond effectively to the challenges posed by climate change. Some NGOs, such as Oxfam, take an environmental justice perspective, arguing that rich countries control access to carbon and are capable of protecting themselves from the ravages of climate change. In contrast, poor countries are least responsible for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, but they pay the price for industrial growth in rich countries. They highlight the implicit power imbalance between rich and poor countries and between carbon haves and have-nots.
NGOs have comparative advantages in global environmental politics. First, global warming is a crisis on a global scale and requires global coordination to provide a solution. Most international NGOs have dense networks, and they often work together in coalitions and coordinate their lobbying efforts in order to maximize the impact. Second, donors do not always trust governments in the developing countries. They prefer offering development aid through NGOs, which are seen as transparent, accountable, and trustworthy. Third, NGOs can respond more quickly than many governments to the needs of local communities. They are also sensitive to gender and power dynamics.
Therefore, NGOs try to build bridges for local people, governments, and international communities. Apart from raising public awareness and engaging affected communities in the decision-making process, NGOs are keen to advocate mitigation and adaptation policies. They launch campaigns to cut GHG emissions in order to reduce global average temperature. They also help poor countries to develop alternative livelihoods, to improve global humanitarian systems, to increase emergency aid, and to reduce the risks of disasters by building long-term social protection. They build local capacity by focusing on disaster preparedness and recovery plans. They also help identify new funding sources for the Adaptation Fund, the largest potential source of funds for climate adaptation in poor countries. Furthermore, they build partnerships with other organizations to provide essential services, such as water and sanitation, to local people.
It needs to be noted that NGOs are a diverse group with varied goals, structures, and motivations. These differences mark heterogeneous policy design, priority, and response to climate change. Different targets, priorities, and strategies show the disparities in history, resources, leadership, expertise, networks, and visions. While some focus more on targets for national CO2 emissions, financial mechanisms, and technology transfer, others are more concerned with humanitarian work and disaster preparedness. For example, Doctors Without Borders focuses on the health implications of higher temperatures on disease patterns, while the International Red Cross, in contrast, emphasizes community-based self-reliance, early-warning operation, risk-mapping, and vulnerability assessment. Oxfam takes a rights-based perspective, arguing that the excessive GHG emissions of rich countries has violated the human rights of poor people in developing countries.
NGOs have faced a number of challenges. First, NGO relationships with local governments in developing countries can be rough. Some NGOs suffer from excessive government interference. Second, NGOs rely on financial support from donors. Donors can make unreasonable demands and put their own agendas above the needs of recipient communities. Third, the legitimacy and governance of NGOs are sometimes questioned because the public wants to know how funds are allocated. Finally, local NGOs feel that cash-rich international NGOs are imposing their agendas on them without building their capacity for dealing with local issues. Local NGOs are concerned that overreliance on foreign NGOs will create a culture of dependence, and that is not conducive to the healthy development of NGOs in developing countries.
Bibliography
Magrath, John, with Andrew Simms. Africa: Up in Smoke 2. London: New Economics Foundation, 2006.
Revi, Aromar. “Climate Change Risk: An Adaptation and Mitigation Agenda for Indian Cities.” Environment and Urbanisation 20, no. 1 (2007): 207–229.
Tosun, Jale and Emiliano Levario Saad. "Adapted to Climate Change? Issue Portfolios of Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the Americas." Nonprofit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, doi.org/10.1177/08997640221146962. Accessed 17 Dec. 2024.
Westover, Jonathan H. "How Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations Can Support Corporate Climate Change Initiatives." Human Leadership Review, Mar. 2022, www.innovativehumancapital.com/article/how-environmental-non-governmental-organizations-can-support-corporate-climate-change-initiatives. Accessed 17 Dec. 2024.
World Bank. Not If but When: Adapting to Natural Hazards in the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: Author, 2006.