Social programs in Canada

Social programs in Canada are publicly funded systems meant to help Canadians in need. They may exist on the federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal levels, or on multiple levels. Some may vary somewhat from region to region. In general, these social programs may be characterized as either service-based or income-based programs. Service programs offer services, such as education, health care, and housing. Income-assistance programs offer direct funding to individuals who cannot work for a variety of reasons, including old age, illness, injury, or childbirth. These programs may be long-term, such as for those who are retired or have lifelong disabilities or temporary payments meant to help people while they search for a job.

Prior to the 1900s, Canada offered few social programs, and Canadians in need generally turned to their families, churches, or employers for assistance. With industrialization and urbanization, leaders eventually recognized the need for more government intervention into the lives, health, and security of its citizens. By the 1960s and 1970s, the Canadian social program system was at its peak. However, growing complaints that the system was bloated and prohibitively expensive led to a downturn in social programs. Social problems such as homelessness and health crises such as COVID-19 have reset the scene and made many leaders believe that social programs should again be expanded.

Overview

Before the era of extensive social programs in Canada, people could seldom turn to the government for personal assistance. In previous generations, it was more common for Canadians to live in sparsely-populated, rural villages. As people became in need of money, fell ill, or required other assistance, they generally turned to their families for help. For example, a mother whose husband died might find herself unable to feed her children and therefore may send them to live with a sibling or cousin’s family. If the family group was unable or unwilling to assist a person in need, that person might also look to a religious organization or private charity for help. In some cases, larger workplaces and tradesman’s guilds might furnish aid, but mainly just to their members and their families.

This environment changed significantly when industrialization began to reshape Canada and many other countries. Millions of people who had traditionally lived and worked in the countryside now migrated into cities and other urbanized areas in search of work in the suddenly growing industrial sector. Within a few generations, cities became the main population and economic centers. Many urban areas became overwhelmed with the influx of new inhabitants, who often faced a lack of space. Urban congestion led to overcrowding, with wealthier residents claiming better homes and the rest of the people jamming into tenements and other group-living structures.

Cities became, all at once, centers of immense wealth and heartbreaking poverty. Overcrowding, fragmented family units, economic exploitation, disease, and urban vice, such as gambling and alcoholism contributed to a wide variety of new and alarming social problems. Traditional family support structures were in many cases shattered during the social transition, alienating people from the hope of assistance from relatives. Religious and private charities expanded during this time to fill the void, with some help from government sources. However, clearly the new status quo demanded a radical change, and over time the government began to assume an ever-increasing responsibility for safeguarding the health, security, and overall well-being of its citizens.

Before the Confederation of Canada, the government mainly considered social welfare a matter for individuals, families, and small communities to maintain. During this period, government leaders acted mainly in a regulatory capacity, generally only intervening in cases of citizens breaking laws or, sometimes, providing rudimentary care for orphans or people with severe disabilities.

Confederation brought a somewhat more organized approach to social programs, but they were not distributed evenly or supported unanimously. Social concerns considered obvious in modern times, such as helping sick, neglected, or orphaned children, grew slowly and over the years. In many cases, the growth of social programs began with private organizations and influential individuals whose work influenced social mores as well as government and church leaders. Some of the earliest focuses of social programs were on protecting the structure of the family, which, despite increasing industrialization, was still widely viewed as the fundamental basis of personal and financial security. Programs sought to regulate matters related to divorce, alimony, and labor laws for women and children. Public programs also pushed for greater protections for health, prevention against the spread of diseases, and mandatory schooling for the young.

By the start of the twentieth century, the state of social programs in Canada was still fragmented. The government continued with its limited and pragmatic approach, which was intended to keep the economy operating smoothly. Leaders of private and religious charities pushed for an increase in social programs, but their success was fitful and limited to some additional financial assistance from government sources. Change arrived in an unexpected, and tragic, way, with the beginning of World War I (1914–1918). This extremely destructive war left many thousands of Canadian soldiers badly wounded, and countless Canadian families bereft of their husbands, fathers, and sons. Throughout the course of the war, Canadian governments increased social programs aimed at helping those negatively impacted by the fighting. Although at first this aim was restricted to service members and their families, it established a new trend of the government intervening increasingly in social matters.

In the 1920s, early attempts took place to establish public programs for low-cost housing and benefits for unemployed and retired workers. This slow trend increased when the Great Depression, beginning in 1929 and extending through the coming decade, caused economic suffering on a previously unimagined scale. Rocketing unemployment in Canada forced the government to establish relief grants and work programs for workers and families in need.

The Conservative Party in Canada, spurred by cries for relief by Depression-struck citizens, proposed a major social reform package known as Bennett’s New Deal—a reference to the New Deal legislation crafted by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Although this package received a deeply mixed reaction, it made clear the idea that the government would no longer sit idly by in the face of the mass suffering of its people. As the Depression continued, the federal government assumed more responsibility for economic goals such as promoting employment and reducing unemployment. Meanwhile, provincial governments would improve relief efforts for people who could not be employed. In 1940, the federal government assumed the power to create an insurance system for unemployed citizens, which carried the ability to raise certain taxes to fund the system.

Events such as these established the framework of the modern social program state, and in the coming years, the trend became ever stronger and clearer. The experience of World War I, the Great Depression, and then the onset of World War II (1939–1945) fully formed the perception of the government as an active overseer and protector of social welfare. In the early 1940s, government influence in social matters rose exponentially; just a few examples include rent controls, promotion of new housing, labor settlements, pensions for veterans, and increased employment of women.

Following the war, different factions debated the changes that had taken place, with some advocating that the government be stripped of some or all its powers. However, the precedent had been set, and the coming decades saw increased establishment of political oversight on social concerns. Toward the start of the twenty-first century, many citizens and government factions moved to check government powers, mainly due to concerns that extensive social programs involved unmanageable costs and worrying levels of debt. Despite some modifications, the system remained largely intact, with the Canadian government holding extensive control of social programs affecting the personal lives of millions of residents.

Applications

In the twenty-first century, Canada maintains a large variety of social programs intended to benefit the country’s populace. These programs may exist on the federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal levels of government and serve to safeguard Canadians’ social, personal, and economic welfare. The large number of social programs may be generally divided into two broad categories, social services programs and income assistance programs, depending on the types of help they offer.

Social Services

One major social program is based on providing services to Canadians. These services may take a significant variety of forms but most often include free or low-cost education, housing, or healthcare plans. The programs in this category may involve payments to individuals but are mainly focused on activities meant to promote the social and personal well-being of residents.

One service that impacts all Canadians is education. Education is mandatory in Canada and is government-funded on the primary and secondary levels. That means that students through high-school age can attend schooling without paying tuition, thanks to funding from taxes. Students seeking further education after high-school—whether that be in apprenticeships or university-level schooling—generally must pay their own tuition, although in many cases government programs may assist payments for students in need through grants and loans.

Through the twentieth century, the Canadian government gradually increased its influence over the housing market with the aim of ensuring that all Canadians can afford a safe place to live. Legislation offers rebates, grants, or loans to qualifying people or settles qualifying people in public housing. This system is most often enacted to help low-income individuals and families, as well as Canadians with disabilities.

Canada also features an extensive medical care system that is largely funded by the government. The different departments of this system, collectively known as Health Canada, may offer services ranging from direct medical treatment to education about good health habits. Canadians have access to a publicly funded health insurance program that covers or contributes to qualifying medical procedures and other services. For some groups of people, including federal prisoners and armed forces members, the government offers direct healthcare services.

In addition to education, housing, and health care, other services extend specifically to certain groups of people within Canadian society. Following from some of the country’s earliest social programs, programs meant to protect the health and well-being of children are common in modern Canada. These programs may use education or counseling to encourage stable and healthy families and may use various interventions in situations in which abused or neglected children need immediate assistance. People with disabilities may also access special support programs that seek to help these people live full lives and find meaningful roles in society. Support programs for people with disabilities may serve to find group housing, arrange work opportunities or set up training classes for qualifying residents.

The practice of providing support to Canada’s Indigenous population has grown significantly over time. In the twenty-first century, a branch of the government known as Indigenous Services Canada provides social programs in health care, education, and personal wellbeing specifically targeted at Indigenous people. Canadian veterans may receive social services or a variety of other benefits in honor of their service to the country. These services may include compensation, life insurance, and assistance with income. Even immigrants and refugees in Canada have access to numerous social programs that can provide loans and help match newcomers to the country with homes and jobs.

Income Assistance

The other main category of social programs involves financial assistance, in which programs directly supply funding to candidates for particular reasons, most commonly unemployment, serious illness, retirement, and the birth of a child. The major branches of income assistance mostly relate to the Canadian workforce and reflect the long-standing government policy of encouraging a healthy economy and industrious citizens.

Employment Insurance is a program that offers temporary help for workers who lose their jobs for reasons outside their own control, including sickness or injuries. A similar program is Worker’s Compensation, which helps workers who become sick or injured in the course of their work. Rather than being publicly funded like most other programs, Worker’s Compensation is funded by employers. The government also seeks to help workers raise families by allowing maternity or parental leave, meaning that a parent may receive paid time off work while delivering and caring for a baby, and programs for workers who must stop working to care for critically ill or injured family members.

Other financial assistance programs help people who may have little income for a variety of reasons. For example, it is common for older and retired people to struggle with finances. Programs such as the Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security offer funding to qualified candidates who have reached a certain age or are unable to work. Income support may also be available on a provincial and territorial level to other people who are in financial need. These programs, analogous to the “welfare” systems of other countries, are mainly intended to provide temporary support while employable people find work.

Viewpoints

The extensive size and range of the Canadian social program system has had a tremendous impact on the country and its citizens—but at a very significant cost. Following the peak of its growth in the 1960s and 1970s, the social program system faced many criticisms and challenges. Many leaders and members of the public felt that it had become bloated, inefficient, and overly expensive. People seeking to limit the range and expense of these programs have promoted a return to Canada’s original focus, on safeguarding the financial stability of the country by encouraging all seemingly employable people to find work.

Reductions in funding and support have caused some programs to contract or end entirely, leaving many people who may be in serious need of help mostly on their own. In many cases, problems such as homelessness, drug abuse, and untreated disabilities have risen with the reduction of government funding. Other major concerns also pose challenges to the social welfare system in Canada. One of these is the continuing and widespread struggle of many Indigenous communities. The population of Canada is becoming, on average, older, suggesting that health care, retirement benefits, and other traditional social assistance will be increasingly in demand in the future.

Attempts to scale back the scope of Canada’s social support programs were derailed in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic spread across Canada and the rest of the world. The pandemic caused massive health risks in every population and led to skyrocketing demand for healthcare products and services. Shutdowns, lockdowns, and quarantines related to the attempt to quell the spread of the illness led to billions of dollars of economic loss. Canada’s government reacted with extensive aid programs to help individuals, businesses, organizations, and entire economic sectors get back on their feet in the coming months and years, as the world began to recover.

In the mid-decade of the 2020s, Canadian social programs faced significant challenges. These included shortages in critical medical personnel such as doctors, which led to shortfalls in areas such as longer emergency room wait times, inaccessibility to treatment, and hospitals operating beyond capacity.

In response to calls for expanded services, in 2024 the Canadian government sought to add additional benefits to its social programs. One example included a national school food program. As inflation had become commonplace worldwide, the Canadian government pledged to invest $1 billion annually over five years in school food programs. This was hoped to counteract the reduced spending power of Canadian families. The Canadian government estimated the funds would feed approximately 400,000 children a year.  The spending was necessitated as government statistics showed that 25% of Canadian school-aged children did not have sufficient access to food.

About the Author

Mark Dziak earned his BA in English from King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, in 2003 and completed a secondary education program there in 2011. He has worked at Northeast Editing, Inc., since 2004. As a content developer, he has researched and written hundreds of educational articles, test items, and other resources on a wide variety of social science topics. In his spare time, Dziak has also published numerous works of nonfiction and fiction.

Bibliography

Albert, J. and B. Kirwin. (2016, December 6). Social and Welfare Services. The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/social-and-welfare-services.

Dangerfield, K. (2024, April 14). Federal Budget 2024: What Lies Ahead for Canada’s Health-Care System?” Global News. Retrieved May 31, 2024 from globalnews.ca/news/10419196/federal-budget-2024-health-care.

Government of Canada. (2022, January 2). Benefits. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits.html.

Government of Canada. (2022, March 24). COVID-19: Financial Support for People, Businesses and Organizations. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/economic-response-plan.html.

Government of Canada. (2022, March 29). Social Programs. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1100100035072/1521125345192.

Government of Manitoba. Social Security Timeline in Canada. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/cur/socstud/foundation‗gr9/blms/9-4-1b.pdf.

Maytree. (2022). Welfare in Canada. Maytree. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from maytree.com/welfare-in-canada/canada.

Izri, T. (2024, 1 April). Ottawa Unveils $1B for National School Food Program.” Global News. Retrieved 31 May 2024, from globalnews.ca/news/10395076/national-school-food-program-funding.

Moscovitch, A. (2019, August 14). Welfare State. The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/welfare-state.

Raymond, K. (2020, November 8). Social Programs in Canada. The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 1, 2022, from www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/social-programs-in-canada.