U.S. policy on refugees
U.S. policy on refugees encompasses both international assistance and domestic resettlement processes. The United States plays a leading role in the global refugee assistance framework, providing support to millions of refugees seeking safety and protection worldwide since World War II. However, the resettlement of refugees in the U.S. has seen significant debate, particularly concerning who is eligible for acceptance. Critics have pointed to perceived biases in the selection process, noting that certain groups, such as Africans and Haitians, have historically received fewer resettlement opportunities compared to others, like Indochinese or Eastern European refugees.
The U.S. definition of refugee status requires individuals to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution based on specific threats, affecting the eligibility of asylum seekers from regions experiencing widespread turmoil. This has resulted in a complex dynamic where political and humanitarian considerations impact decisions on resettlement. The principle of family reunification, which often favors ethnic groups already in the U.S., has been a significant factor in determining resettlement admissions. Recent political climates, particularly following the 2016 election, have further complicated the landscape, leading to reduced prospects for refugee resettlement in the U.S. Understanding these dynamics is essential for comprehending the broader implications of U.S. refugee policy.
U.S. policy on refugees
US refugee policy has both overseas and domestic components. The United States provides overseas assistance to the millions of refugees who need support and protection. It also selects a much smaller number of refugees for resettlement to the United States from the countries in which they have sought asylum. The United States has been the principal architect of the world’s refugee assistance network, which has assisted and protected millions of refugees throughout the world without regard to their ethnic or racial backgrounds since the end of World War II.
![Refugees and Asylum Seekers by Host Country, 1997. By Institute for National Strategic Studies [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 96397732-96390.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/96397732-96390.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
In the area of resettlement of refugees to the United States, however, there is a good deal more controversy. Although the United States is the leading country of resettlement for refugees under the resettlement program of the United Nations Refugee Agency, US law and policy regarding who is accepted for resettlement has led some critics to accuse the US government of racial bias or discrimination. Very few Africans, for example, have historically been resettled in the United States, although more than 1.5 million Indochinese refugees were accepted following the Vietnam War. Refugees from Eastern Europe and the Balkans were also resettled in large numbers in the late twentieth century, as were Cubans. However, the US rarely accepted Haitians, and Central American asylum seekers were rejected in large numbers. Refugees from the Syrian Civil War (2011-) flooded Europe in the millions throughout the 2010s, while the United States resettled only a few thousand.
Others counter that US refugee resettlement policy is grounded in the particular definition of refugee status found in US law, and that the political and humanitarian needs of particular groups of refugees, rather than ethnic background or race are the determining factors in who gets accepted for resettlement to the United States. The US government’s definition of refugee status, which reflects the post–World War II preoccupation with repressive Communist governments, requires that asylum seekers demonstrate a well-founded, individually based fear of persecution by their country of nationality. In Africa, the Middle East, and many other parts of the world, whole groups of people flee because of general turmoil and disorder in their countries rather than because of specific acts of persecution aimed at individuals by their government. In Africa, most refugees find protection in their countries of first asylum, and do not, as a general rule, require resettlement to safer countries of asylum. However, Turkey was overwhelmed by an influx of over 4 million Syrian refugees in the late 2010s—the most of any country—and repeatedly asked other countries for help coping with the crisis.
In Southeast Asia in the twentieth century, regional governments refused to grant even temporary haven to asylum seekers until governments such as the United States stepped forward to offer resettlement opportunities. The fact that Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees fled from Communist governments opposed by the United States made it easier for the US government to justify accepting such large numbers of them as refugees. Similarly, Cubans fleeing from Fidel Castro’s Communist regime were accepted, while Haitians fleeing from right-wing dictatorship and a desperately poor economic situation have been routinely rejected as economic migrants. Supporters of US refugee resettlement policies point out that the principle of family reunification is a major factor in accepting refugees for resettlement. This principle tends to favor ethnic groups who are already present in the United States in greater numbers.
As anti-immigrant sentiment grew with the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, however, the prospects for increased resettlement of refugees to the United States looked poor. In 2020, the annual refugee cap was 15,000, and 11,400 refugees were admitted—a historic low due to new policies and the COVID-19 pandemic. However, in 2022, President Biden raised the refugee cap to 125,000. In 2023, the US admitted over 60,000 refugees, the most since 2016, mainly from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Syria, and Afghanistan. By 2025, thousands of Afghan and Ukrainian refugees had arrived in the US. However, in January 2025, newly reelected President Trump suspended the Refugee Resettlement Program by issuing an executive order, leaving the US policy on refugees uncertain.
Bibliography
Chishti, Muzaffar, et al. ." Migration Policy Institute, 30 Oct. 2024, www.migrationpolicy.org/article/rebuilt-us-refugee-resettlement-biden.
Felter, Claire, and James McBride. "How Does the U.S. Refugee System Work?" Council on Foreign Relations, 26 Mar. 2024, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/how-does-us-refugee-system-work-trump-biden-afghanistan
"An Overview of U.S. Refugee Law and Policy." American Immigration Council, 22 Oct. 2022,
Ramanathan, Vaidehi, and Emily M. Feuerherm, editors. Refugee Resettlement in the United States: Language, Policy, Pedagogy. Multilingual Matters, 2015.
." The White House, 20 Jan. 2025, www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/realigning-the-united-states-refugee-admissions-program.
"Resettlement in the United States." UNHCR,
Schofield, Noah, and Amanda Yap. "Refugees: 2023." Office of Homeland Security Statistics, Nov. 2024, ohss.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024‗1108‗ohss‗refugee‗annual‗flow‗report‗2023.pdf.