Ebola Quarantine Restrictions: Overview
The Ebola Quarantine Restrictions debate centers around the measures taken in the United States in response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak, which was linked to a severe epidemic affecting West Africa. As the virus emerged within the U.S. borders, public health officials and policymakers faced intense scrutiny regarding how to mitigate the risk of an outbreak. This led to the implementation of mandatory quarantine policies in several states, notably New York and New Jersey, which established strict guidelines for healthcare workers returning from affected regions. Proponents of these restrictions argued that quarantines were essential for safeguarding public health, while opponents raised concerns about the economic and emotional impacts on individuals, particularly medical personnel who had been on the front lines of the crisis.
The debate highlighted fundamental tensions between public health imperatives and civil liberties, as well as the broader implications for healthcare workers' welfare. While mandatory quarantines aimed to prevent the virus from taking hold in developed nations, critics pointed to the need for a more nuanced approach that considered the psychological and logistical burdens placed on those quarantined. The discussion around these policies has evolved, particularly as the international situation with Ebola stabilized, but concerns about the appropriateness of such measures remain relevant for future outbreaks of infectious diseases. The conversation reflects the ongoing challenge of balancing effective disease control with respect for individual rights and freedoms.
Ebola Quarantine Restrictions debate
In the fall of 2014, the United States was gripped by fear and controversy surrounding the first diagnosed case of Ebola in the country, confirmed in September by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Three more cases in the United States--infections with origins the Ebola outbreak in West Africa that began in December 2013--would follow.
The appearance of the disease in the United States sparked a debate over how best to protect the country from succumbing to an outbreak of the highly contagious virus. One controversial suggestion was to implement mandatory quarantines for people traveling to the United States from Ebola-stricken countries. Several states, including New Jersey and New York, instituted such policies.
Proponents of quarantine argued that it is the most effective method of ensuring that the disease never gains a foothold in the developed world and that the greater good of maintaining public health is worth the personal price. Opponents, however, countered that quarantines posed numerous problems, including unnecessarily severe costs for travelers, especially medical personnel returning from the affected area.
Understanding the Discussion
Ebola: A virus that causes a severe illness in humans and has its reservoir in wild mammal populations (such as bats and primates).
Epidemic: A sudden eruption of an infectious disease across a large area in a relatively brief time.
Incubation period: The time it takes between infection with a given pathogen (such as bacteria or a virus) and when symptoms actually manifest.
Quarantine: Placing a person in supervised isolation so that he or she cannot transmit a disease to anyone else until it is confirmed he or she is disease free.
Zoonosis: An infectious disease that has its origins in an animal population and is able to spread to humans; often more dangerous in humans.
History
When the Ebola virus infects humans, it causes a life-threatening illness known as Ebola virus disease (EVD), formerly called Ebola hemorrhagic fever. The fatality rates during a given outbreak vary widely, but average mortality is 50 percent, according to the World Health Organization (WHO); even the least-fatal outbreaks have had mortality upward of 25 percent. The incubation period for the disease is anywhere from two to twenty-one days, with an average of eight to ten days. Early symptoms include fever, headache, and nausea and vomiting, which resemble those of other common illnesses such as malaria. This makes the disease difficult to detect in the early stages. As the disease progresses, it can lead to unexplained bleeding in some cases, with blood present in the patient's stools, vomit, and urine. However, the disease is not transmissible before symptoms manifest.
Although treatment is limited to symptom-based care, candidates for Ebola vaccines and antiviral medications have been an area of special focus in the wake of the 2014 outbreak. Notably, survival rates are significantly improved with a combination of early detection and basic care (such as fluids to help replace water lost through vomiting and diarrhea). When the disease does appear in developed countries with well-established medical infrastructures and access to the fundamentals of modern medicine, such as adequate isolation wards and proper sterilization, fatalities are relatively uncommon. Of the four cases that developed in the United States in the fall of 2014, there was only one death.
Ebola is a relatively new disease, which helps to explain its virulence. A zoonosis, it emerged in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC; then called Zaire) in 1976, transmitted from hosts in local wildlife. Contact with the bodily fluids (such as blood, saliva, or mucus) of an infected fruit bat or primate can allow the disease to make the transition to humans, at which point it begins spreading person to person, also through bodily fluid contact.
According to the CDC, in the roughly four decades since the first recorded outbreak, there have been more than thirty individual cases of the disease passing into human populations and starting an outbreak. These outbreaks have, however, been mostly minor, with limited case numbers and only a few fatalities. Three of the worst outbreaks since the initial emergence of the disease occurred in 1995 (DRC), 2000-2001 (Uganda), and 2007 (DRC).
The latest epidemic began in December of 2013, eventually encompassing the West African countries of Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, with isolated cases in nearby countries and a few more isolated infections spread around the world by travel. It is by far the largest outbreak in history, with joint case counts from the CDC totaling 23,781 cases and 9,637 confirmed deaths by late February 2014. For comparison, the next-largest outbreak, 2000-2001 in Uganda, totaled 425 cases and 224 deaths.
The success of the virus in establishing itself and growing into a proper outbreak is highly contingent on the medical infrastructure and economic state of the places where it emerges. The disease has only been able to ravage West Africa due to a potent mix of poverty and poor medical care. Unsurprisingly, these areas are also destinations for foreign aid and volunteers. Unfortunately, health workers and volunteers are among the most susceptible to infection, thanks to their frequent and prolonged contact with blood or other fluids from Ebola patients, either directly or through soiled clothing and other materials.
Because of the disease's potentially lengthy incubation period, monitoring patients to ensure that they do not transmit the disease can be extremely difficult. Even patients who appear outwardly healthy can transmit the disease through semen or breast milk for many weeks after recovery. Because Ebola is so highly infectious and difficult to contain, quarantine is a common practice when anyone is suspected of having the disease. However, the nature of quarantines can vary hugely.
At one end of the spectrum are voluntary quarantines--essentially recommendations that patients who have a low chance of being infectious stay away from crowds and public spaces. At the other are mandatory quarantines, up to including forcing people into isolation if they have been medical care workers in affected countries--regardless of their level of exposure or test results.
The CDC's guidelines for Ebola quarantine depend largely on voluntary isolation and only recommend intervention when a patient shows signs of disease or otherwise increased likelihood of being infected. Several states have established their own mandatory quarantine policies in response to the 2014 Ebola epidemic that go above and beyond the CDC's recommendations.
Ebola Quarantine Restrictions Today
New York and New Jersey have some of the strictest and most controversial policies, set by Governors Andrew Cuomo and Chris Christie, respectively, in response to the 2014 cases. Those policies call for mandatory quarantine for all health-care workers returning to the United States from Ebola-affected countries in West Africa. Symptomatic patients are immediately sent to quarantine in a hospital, while asymptomatic persons who had contact with Ebola patients must wait out a quarantine of twenty-one days (the maximum incubation period for Ebola virus) with two unannounced visits per day from health officials to check for symptoms and ensure compliance. In New York, the affected individuals can choose where to be quarantined, while in New Jersey, they must be quarantined at home or, if a nonresident, in a medical facility. Even workers with no contact with Ebola patients will be monitored twice per day for twenty-one days after return. Financial reimbursement will be provided to people who are quarantined.
Georgia has a similar mandatory quarantine in effect but will not reimburse affected individuals. California and Connecticut also have notably strict quarantine policies and consider the terms of those quarantines on a case-by-case basis, which civil libertarians have found worrisome. Maine instituted at-home quarantine, following New Jersey's lead, but has largely followed the CDC guidelines issued in October 2014.
National fears over Ebola cooled after the fall of 2014, and with the calm came decreased political interest in quarantines and public outcry for decisive action. Meanwhile, the outbreak in West Africa continued, with February 2015 reports from the CDC and WHO listing Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea as the worst-affected countries with widespread transmission.
A large number of medical experts and well-respected commenters decried the use of mandatory quarantines. Among them were the CDC, Doctors Without Borders, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Although debate has subsided over the appropriate use of quarantine and the number of cases in the developed world has been limited to the single digits, the question of the appropriate action is bound to reignite the next time Ebola or another highly infectious disease appears on US soil.
