Blasphemy
Blasphemy refers to contemptuous or irreverent expressions about God or matters deemed sacred by a dominant religion. Historically, blasphemy laws in the United States were enforced during the early 19th century, despite the constitutional protection of freedom of speech and religion. Notably, individuals like Abner Kneeland faced prosecution for religious skepticism, highlighting a tension between state laws and individual liberties. The U.S. Supreme Court has never directly reviewed a blasphemy case, but it did rule against blasphemy laws in the 1952 case Burstyn v. Wilson, asserting that they violate First Amendment rights. While some states still have blasphemy laws on the books, they are largely considered unconstitutional and are not enforced. Globally, blasphemy laws persist in over eighty countries, with varying levels of enforcement, often leading to human rights concerns, particularly for religious minorities. However, many Western nations have abolished such laws in favor of protecting freedom of expression and religion. The topic of blasphemy continues to evoke discussions about the balance between religious sensitivity and the rights of individuals to express dissenting beliefs.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Blasphemy
Description: Contemptuous or irreverent expressions about God or matters held sacred in the dominant religion.
Relevant amendment: First
Significance: During the first half of the nineteenth century, state prosecutions of blasphemy occurred even when state Bills of Rights guaranteed freedom of speech and religion. Such prosecutions gradually ended because of the growth of secular and libertarian ideas. Under the Massachusetts blasphemy statute of 1782, “denying God” or “reproaching Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost” were criminal acts. The state prosecuted and convicted a significant number of persons under the blasphemy laws for about fifty years. In 1838, Abner Kneeland was sentenced to six months in the Suffolk County jail for his strong assertions of religious skepticism. The state’s supreme court upheld both the law and Kneeland’s conviction.
In New York, blasphemy was occasionally prosecuted as a crime at common law. The crime was defined as “maliciously reviling God or religion.” In 1811, a defendant was fined five hundred dollars and imprisoned for three months for “wickedly, maliciously, and blasphemously” saying in the presence of “good and Christian people” that “Jesus Christ was a bastard and his mother must be a whore.” When upholding the conviction in People v. Ruggles (1811), the state’s Chief Judge James Kent wrote that such language was “a gross violation of decency and good order.” Allowing blasphemy to go unpunished, he asserted, would do great harm to the “tender morals of the young,” eventually producing a culture in which oaths on the Bible would not be trustworthy.
![AbnerKneeland NYHistoricalSociety. Portrait of Abner Kneeland, who was sentenced to jail for Blasphemy in 1838. By Artist unknown [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons 95522669-95975.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/95522669-95975.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
![Supreme Court 06. The United States Supreme Court has never reviewed a prosecution for Blasphemy. By Bjoertvedt (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons 95522669-95976.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/95522669-95976.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
The United States (US) Supreme Court never had to review a prosecution for blasphemy because the First Amendment was not made applicable to the states until about a century after such prosecutions ended. However, the Court did rule that blasphemy laws were unconstitutional in the case of Burstyn v. Wilson (1952). In this case, the Court overturned a New York law that had authorized the censorship of “sacrilegious” movies.
Although blasphemy laws may remain in some US states, they are not enforced and are considered unconstitutional due to their violation of First Amendment rights. Globally, blasphemy laws exist in over eighty countries, although their degree of enforcement varies drastically. In some countries, blasphemy laws threaten human rights and persecute religious minorities. However, by the 2020s, most western countries had abolished their blasphemy laws to protect freedom of expression and religion.
Bibliography
"Global Blasphemy Laws." US Commission on International Religious Freedom, 7 Dec. 2020, www.uscirf.gov/news-room/uscirf-spotlight/global-blasphemy-laws. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.
"Text - H.Res.512 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Calling for the Global Repeal of Blasphemy, Heresy, and Apostasy Laws." Congress.gov, 7 Dec. 2020, www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/512/text. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.
Vile, John R. "Blasphemy - The First Amendment Encyclopedia." Free Speech Center, 8 Aug. 2023, firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/blasphemy. Accessed 24 Aug. 2024.