Mathematics of Eastern Asia

Summary: Across eastern Asia, mathematics education is given a high priority, with the goal of continuing the region’s tradition of excellence.

Eastern Asia is one of the most populated regions of the world, lagging behind only southern Asia, and includes the Chinese cultural sphere once called the “Far eastern civilizations”: China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, Japan, Mongolia, North Korea, and South Korea. The region is by no means homogeneous but has certainly been influenced to varying degrees by China in its writing systems, its cuisine, its architecture, and its religion. These influences are principally historical, cultural exchange being less centralized now, and influences like the Western world and the Soviet Union (in the case of Mongolia and North Korea) having been significant in the recent past. The technology sector is important in much of this region and mathematics education is a priority. Mathematics education in most of east Asia follows the Confucian model.

94981929-91441.jpg

Number System

The number system in all Chinese-based east Asian languages centers on the same decimal system as the West but with stricter adherence to simple place-value patterns. For example, employing literal translations, the word for the number 12 is ten-two, 20 is two-ten, 37 is three-ten, seven, and 533 is five-hundred, three-ten, three. This system, along with the use of an abacus, facilitates the understanding of place value among east Asian elementary students. east Asian countries also follow the Chinese myriad-grouping system, which groups large numbers by ten thousands, rather than thousands. In other words, these languages have single words for the numbers “ten thousand” and “one-hundred million,” but not for “million” or “billion.”

Educational Philosophy

Historically, public east Asian mathematics classrooms could be generalized as teachers delivering lectures to large classes of students who are expected to master calculations and grasp theory through repetition and memorization. Inherent in this Confucian approach is the assumption among students, parents, and teachers that mathematical success results more from diligent studying than natural talent. Student-centric and practical applications of mathematics are not a primary focus in east Asia, as they sometimes are in the West. This educational philosophy is true not only of the textbooks, which in east Asia are succinct and cover the minimal core set forth by each of the national governments but also of the classrooms, which must closely follow the textbooks. However, since the international test results illuminated relative weaknesses in problem solving, creativity, and practical applications, the east Asian governments have been working to adapt curricula in various ways.

China

Chinese children’s task of memorizing thousands of Chinese characters naturally seems to transfer to the subject of mathematics where memorization of formulas and processes is assumed to lead to understanding and discovery.

While mainland China did not participate in some international comparisons, the Chinese team has performed exceptionally well in the annual International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), a competition among high school students, where it placed first almost every year between 1990 and 2010. But these achievements in mathematics are not limited to Chinese students; two Chinese mathematicians have received the distinguished Wolf Prize in Mathematics: Shiing-Shen Chern in 1983–1984 and Shing-Tung Yau in 2010.

Hong Kong

The mathematics education system in Hong Kong employs elements both from mainland China and Great Britain. Despite the fact that international test scores ranked students from Hong Kong as years ahead of many Western countries, there is widespread concern about students viewing mathematics as irrelevant beyond testing. This concern has been leading to a curriculum that emulates the Western approach to teaching more mathematics related to problem solving and practical abilities.

Japan

While Japan distinguished itself in mathematics from the other east Asian countries during the Edo period (1603–1868), modern Japanese mathematics carries few remnants of this period. One such remnant is the soroban, a Japanese modification of an abacus. Japanese schoolchildren continue to use this beaded calculation device as a means of mastering the decimal system. Like in all east Asian countries, private schools (called juku) are attended widely by Japanese students. Japan has produced some of Asia’s best mathematicians of the past century, including three winners of the Wolf Prize (Kunihiko Kodaira in 1984–1985, Kiyoshi Ito in 1987, and Mikio Sato in 2002–2003), and three winners of mathematics’ most revered award, the Fields Medal (Kunihiko Kodaira in 1954, Heisuke Hironaka in 1970, and Shigefumi Mori in 1990).

Mongolia

Geographically, Mongolia lies between China and Russia. Until the early twentieth century, it was largely under the control of China and was later strongly influenced by Russia and the Soviet Union, adopting a Soviet-style government until 1990. Mongolian teams began participating in the International Mathematical Olympiad in 1964. Ming Antu was a Mongolian mathematician and astronomer, though he has been referred to as Chinese in the past. He worked on infinite series in the eighteenth century, among other accomplishments.

North Korea

While North Korea has the same Confucian background as the other east Asian countries, the former Soviet Union played a significant role in sculpting the modern approach to mathematics education. As do most countries around the world, the North Korean education system upholds mathematics as a central focus for both primary and secondary students, although North Korean story problems tend to be phrased in a nationalistic context. Students who excel in mathematics during their secondary school education may be admitted into the esteemed Kim Il-Sung University. In terms of global rankings, North Korea has sporadically entered a team into the International Mathematics Olympiad, some of which placed in the top 10.

South Korea

From childhood, South Koreans grow up using two separate number systems in their daily lives. The first one, a purely Korean system, is used mainly for counting objects, animals, and people and is no longer used for numbers larger than 99. It is worth noting that the numerals in this Korean system do not follow the same simple place-holding constructions as the number systems rooted in the Chinese language. The Sino-Korean number system, on the other hand, does follow these rules, and is most commonly used with money and large numbers. In school, many South Korean students receive just as much, if not more, of their mathematics instruction from private tutors or hagwons (academies) as from the public school environment. This system stems from the inextricable link between a student’s mathematics performance on entrance exams and his or her eventual place in society. Some people cite this pressure as an explanation for why South Korean and Japanese students, despite performing exceptionally well on international tests, also rank the highest in their professed dislike for mathematics.

Taiwan

Private mathematics academies in Taiwan are referred to as buxiban (cram schools), suggesting their primary, but not exclusive, role of preparing Taiwanese students for entrance examinations. With electronics as a major industry, there has been a recent overhaul of the Taiwanese education system to focus on practical applications of mathematics instead of only theoretical mathematics.

Bibliography

Kennedy, Peter. “Learning Cultures and Learning Styles: Myth-Understandings About Adult (Hong Kong) Chinese Learners.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 21 (2002).

Lankov, Andrei. North of the DMZ: Essays on Daily Life in North Korea. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company, 2007.

Lee, Jihyun. “Universals and Specifics of Math Self-Concept, Math Self-Efficacy, and Math Anxiety Across 41 PISA 2003 Participating Countries.” Learning and Individual Differences 19 (2009).

Leung, Frederick K. S., Klaus-D. Graf, and Francis J. Lopez-Real, eds. Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions—A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West. New York: Springer, 2006.

Rong, Xin. “The General Solution of Ming Antu’s Problem.” Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 20, no. 1 (2004).

Usiskin, Zalman, and Edwin Willmore, eds. Mathematics Curriculum in Pacific Rim Countries—China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. Chicago: Informations Age Publishing, 2008.

Yau, Shing-Tung. S.S. Chern: A Great Geometer of the Twentieth Century. Boston: International Press of Boston, 1998.