Positivism
Positivism is a philosophical theory developed by French philosopher Auguste Comte in the early 19th century, asserting that social reality can only be comprehended through scientific inquiry and governed by natural laws. Comte proposed that human thought evolves through three stages: theological, metaphysical, and his proposed positivist stage, which he viewed as the most advanced and rational. This perspective emphasizes that knowledge is derived from observable phenomena and that complex social behaviors can be understood through systematic collection of data and analysis.
Positivism incorporates elements of realism, suggesting that reality exists independently of human perception, and embraces reductionism, breaking down complex systems into simpler components. It also touches on dualism, acknowledging both subjective and objective experiences as meaningful in the quest for knowledge. While influential in various fields such as psychology, sociology, and economics, positivism has faced criticism from postmodern philosophers who argue against the notion of absolute truths and emphasize the importance of subjective interpretations and personal experiences in understanding human behavior. Despite these critiques, the principles of positivism continue to be utilized in contemporary social research and discourse.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Positivism
Positivism is a term that was coined by a French philosopher Auguste Comte in 1822. Comte believed that social reality can be explained only through science and that society’s behavior can be determined and governed by natural laws. More importantly, Comte regarded all factual knowledge and phenomena a result of a predictable set of relations or a combination of relations. Positivism therefore, became a significant frame of reference in social research.
Overview
In the Enlightenment, the European intellectual flowering of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, human thought was divided into two stages: the theological and the metaphysical. The theological stage explained that everything that happened in the world was a reflection of God’s will. The metaphysical stage explained social life and ways of being through natural existence. Comte viewed these two stages as imperfect and launched the third stage. Comte did not credit himself for his views, however, but acknowledged the views of the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Socrates, both of whom had expressed ideas that Comte labeled positivist. Positivism adopted the philosophical view of realism, which stated that reality is independent of human intervention and can be predicted and understood through a collection of data and supporting evidence. Positivism also incorporated reductionism, whereby complex phenomena are reduced to their constituent parts and put back together on the basis of casual laws. Finally, positivism encompassed René Descartes’ philosophy of dualism, which differentiates between the subjective and the objective but believes that both offer meaning as to what is known and the facts leading to that knowledge. After examining these views, Comte determined that science was the foundation of knowledge and that phenomena can be explained through a series of observations, predictions, and conclusions that then can become laws.
Later, positivism became influential in social research and reforms. Other philosophers who came after Comte, such as Charles Darwin, used positivist notions in their work. However, positivism was challenged by the postmodern philosophers, such as Jean Baudrillard, Jacques Derrida, and Michel Foucault. For instance, they criticized the positivists for believing that objects of a study can be described through observation and testing in order to draw conclusions about them. They also criticized the positivists’ belief that knowledge can be discovered, collected, tested, and measured to determine absolute truth. In contrast, the postmodernists believe that to understand the objects of a study, one must consider the interpretations of the world as explained by social scientists. Also, the postmodernists believe in the need to consider personal feelings to determine behavior rather than rigidly dwelling on rational terms and objectivity to predict behavior. Positivism holds that absolute truth can be determined, but the postmodernists believe there is no absolute truth.
Despite the criticisms of the postmodernists, the positivist tenets are still espoused by many philosophers and continue to unfold. Positivist elements are still utilized by researchers in the fields of psychology, law, economics, and sociology.
Bibliography
Caldwell, Bruce J. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Rev. ed., Routledge, 1999.
Comte, Auguste. A General View of Positivism. Digital ed., Cambridge UP, 2009.
Comte, Auguste. The Positive Philosophy. Reprint ed., Nabu, 2010.
Fox, Dorothy, Mary Beth Gouthro, Yeganeh Morakabati, and John Brackstone. Doing Events Research: From Theory to Practice. Routledge, 2014.
Kincheloe, Joe L., and Kenneth Tobin. “The Much Exaggerated Death of Positivism.” Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 4, 2009, pp. 513–28.
Kress, Tricia M. Critical Praxis Research: Breathing New Life into Research Methods for Teachers. Springer, 2011.
Mill, John Stuart. Auguste Comte and Positivism. Charles River Editors, 2018. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=2599519&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
Scharff, Robert C. How History Matters to Philosophy: Reconsidering Philosophy’s Past after Positivism. Routledge, 2014.
Sebok, Anthony J. Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge UP, 2008. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law.
Somekh, Bridget, and Cathy Lewin, editors. Research Methods in the Social Science. Sage, 2006.
Wilson, Nicholas Hoover, and Damon Mayrl. After Positivism: New Approaches to Comparison in Historical Sociology. Columbia UP, 2024. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=3686444&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Accessed 5 Nov. 2024.
Yoshida, Kei. Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism: A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions. Lexington, 2014.