Radical skepticism
Radical skepticism is a philosophical viewpoint asserting that it is impossible to have certainty in knowledge. This perspective suggests that all beliefs can be doubted, leading to the conclusion that no belief can be held with absolute confidence. The term derives from the Latin "radicalis," meaning "root," and the Greek "skepsis," meaning "inquiry," emphasizing the importance of questioning accepted truths. Historical figures, including philosophers like Plato and Pyrrhus, have engaged with this concept, examining the foundations of knowledge rigorously.
Radical skepticism posits that even our senses and memories are unreliable, which raises the bar for what constitutes acceptable proof or evidence. This heightened skepticism serves a critical role in the pursuit of truth, particularly in scientific inquiry, where questioning assumptions can lead to more accurate results. However, it can also challenge beliefs that require a degree of faith or conviction, such as those found in religious contexts. Moreover, radical skepticism may lead to controversial assertions, such as the notion that reality itself might be an illusion. Overall, while it enhances the quest for knowledge, it complicates the acceptance of concepts beyond empirical verification.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Radical skepticism
Radical skepticism is a philosophical concept stating that it is impossible to know anything for certain. It is based on the idea that since there can be doubt about any belief, no belief can be held with absolute confidence. Therefore, all beliefs are subject to doubt and skeptical questioning.
Overview
The term radical skepticism comes from the Latin radicalis, meaning “root,” and the Greek word skepsis, meaning “inquiry.” Over time, the word radical came to refer to something that needed to be considered or changed from the root up; skepticism came to mean questioning something to determine its validity.
The philosophical concept of skepticism was first noted at least as far back as 350 BCE, with many famous Greek philosophers such as Pyrrhus, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle taking a skeptical approach to knowledge. This meant that they examined all aspects of something before accepting it as a known truth.
Over time, the meaning of skepticism changed. Instead of referring to studying something thoroughly to understand the truth, skepticism came to mean doubting things that were generally accepted as truths. In the case of radical skepticism, it came to mean doubting even one’s own senses and knowledge. This results in radical skeptics doubting that anything can be known for sure.
Being skeptical is an important part of the quest for truth and knowledge. It is especially important to scientific pursuits. For example, a scientist studying a blood sample would be right to question the type and source of the sample and to check to be sure the equipment used to study it is working properly. This type of skepticism helps ensure accurate results.
Radical skepticism states that even these precautions are not enough, because the scientist cannot trust their own senses, memory, or knowledge of the sample or equipment settings. According to radical skeptics, nothing can be known beyond doubt, so any results from studying the sample remain suspect. Radical skeptics believe that nothing can be known for sure because everything is subject to uncertainty.
Most experts see radical skepticism as a method to intensify the quest for true knowledge. The standards by which a position is proven are set by the branch of philosophy known as epistemology. Epistemology deals with rules and methods used to determine what is absolute fact and what is an opinion or theory. In most cases, observed evidence and established facts are accepted as standards. Radical skepticism sets the bar even higher.
By challenging even basic concepts such as what a person sees, hears, or remembers, radical skeptics set the highest possible standard for proof. The person searching for knowledge or trying to prove a belief is required to do more intensive study to reach a higher level of certainty in proving their point.
While this may have some benefits, it does create problems. It eliminates belief in anything without concrete proof—such as faith or religion. It has also led to some controversial theories, such as the idea that all of what human beings experience as life is a dream and not reality.
Bibliography
Carter, J. A. “Radical Skepticism and the Epistemology of Confusion.” University of Glasgow, 2019, eprints.gla.ac.uk/185652/. Accessed 26 Dec. 2020.
“Descartes’ Epistemology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 27 Nov. 2023, plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes-epistemology/. Accessed 4 Dec. 2024.
Falk, Isabelle. “When Do We Need Skepticism?” Emory University, 22 Sept. 2014, scholarblogs.emory.edu/millsonph100/2014/09/22/when-do-we-need-skepticism/. Accessed 26 Dec. 2020.
Pritchard, Duncan. “Contemporary Skepticism.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, iep.utm.edu/skepcont/. Accessed 4 Dec. 2024.
Van der Breggen, Hendrik. “Reasonable Skepticism about Radical Skepticism.” Christian Research Institute, 25 Aug. 2022, www.equip.org/article/reasonable-skepticism-about-radical-skepticism/. Accessed 4 Dec. 2024.