Relativism
Relativism is a philosophical doctrine asserting that there are no absolute truths, with the validity of beliefs and perspectives being contingent upon the individual, culture, or context in which they arise. This approach emphasizes that each viewpoint holds legitimacy and that no single belief system should be prioritized over another. The roots of relativism trace back to ancient Greek Sophists, particularly to Protagoras, who famously claimed that humans are the measure of all things, suggesting that perceptions and values are subjective. Various forms of relativism exist, including epistemological relativism, which pertains to knowledge, and moral relativism, which relates to ethics.
While relativism serves as a useful analytical tool in fields such as anthropology to mitigate ethnocentrism, it has been met with considerable criticism. Opponents argue that it can justify harmful behaviors and erode foundational truths, leading to societal instability. Religious leaders, including recent Popes, have expressed concerns about its implications for divine law and universal values. Additionally, critics from the rationalist camp, including prominent figures like Richard Dawkins, warn that cultural relativism can threaten scientific integrity. Overall, relativism invites diverse perspectives while simultaneously challenging the framework of objective truth in various domains.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Relativism
Relativism is a philosophical doctrine that holds that there is no absolute truth, and so all points of view have validity depending on the people holding them and the circumstances. If all points of view have legitimacy, according to relativism, then no standpoint or held belief should be privileged over another. The core idea is that a given value or belief—knowledge, morality, beauty, meaning—is relative to a particular framework of perception and understanding, be it an individual, a time period, a culture, or a conceptual system. Relativism is a frequent target of criticism, as it is seen by many as leading to the excusing of virtually any kind of behavior, even the obviously harmful.
Overview
Ancient Greek Sophists—nomadic teachers who offered lessons on wisdom and virtue for a fee—are believed to be the Western fathers of relativism. Sophistic relativism is sourced to the teacher Protagoras, who presented the following thesis, as quoted in Plato’s dialogue the Theaetetus (ca. 369 BCE): “A human being is the measure of all things, of those things that are, that they are, and of those things that are not, that they are not.” While exact interpretations of the thesis differ, it is widely accepted to be an endorsement of relativism in perception. Elsewhere in the dialogue, it becomes evident that Protagoras’s relativism applied to the political and ethical realms as well.
It follows that there are many types of relativism. Epistemological relativism asserts the relativity of knowledge; moral relativism the relativity of moral values; and so on. While in a broad sense, relativism is a lens for analytic philosophical thought, it is a principle that can be practically applied to any number of fields. For example, an anthropologist might employ methodological relativism in his or her research so as to avoid ethnocentrism in the assessment of other cultures.
Relativism faces criticism from many factions within the philosophical world. Religious thinkers contend that it undermines the authority of divine law and degrades the universal truths upon which society functions. Both Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI denounced what they considered to be a worldwide shift toward relativism. Relativism is viewed by many rationalist thinkers as contrary to the principles of science. Evolutionary biologist and prominent atheist Richard Dawkins has warned of the dangers that cultural relativism poses to scientific thought, and the British philosopher Christopher Norris wrote extensively on the subject in his 1997 book Against Relativism:Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction, and Critical Theory.
Bibliography
Alford, C. Fred. “Young People, Relativism, and Natural Law.” Good Society Journal 20.2 (2011): 303–18. Print.
Hales, Steven D. A Companion to Relativism. Malden: Wiley, 2011. Print.
Kölbel, Max. “How to Spell Out Genuine Relativism and How to Defend Indexical Relativism.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15.2 (2007): 281–88. Print.
Krausz, Michael, ed. Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology. New York: Columbia UP, 2010. Print.
Quintelier, Katinka, and Daniel Fessler. “Varying Versions of Moral Relativism: The Philosophy and Psychology of Normative Relativism.” Biology and Philosophy 27.1 (2012): 95–113. Print.
Rittelmeyer, Helen. “Moral Relativism, RLE.” American Spectator 45.7 (2012): 40–43. Print.
Scharp, Kevin. “Truth, the Liar, and Relativism.” Philosophical Review 122.3 (2013): 427–510. Print.
Sikka, Sonia. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference: Enlightened Relativism. New York: Cambridge UP, 2011. Print.