Ecocentrism vs. technocentrism
Ecocentrism and technocentrism represent two contrasting philosophical approaches to environmental issues and humanity's relationship with the Earth. Ecocentrism emphasizes the intrinsic value of nature and advocates for a moral framework that prioritizes ecological balance and a respectful coexistence with the natural world. In contrast, technocentrism focuses on human ingenuity and technological advancement as key solutions to environmental problems, asserting that innovation can overcome challenges, such as climate change.
Ecocentrists tend to advocate for a fundamental change in human practices and lifestyles to address destructive behaviors contributing to the current environmental crisis. They argue for a simpler, more sustainable way of life that acknowledges natural limits. Technocentrists, on the other hand, often believe that the potential for human creativity and technical solutions should not be underestimated, and they contend that calls for reduced development may hinder social justice and economic opportunities.
While ecocentrists view technocentric ambitions as expressions of human hubris, technocentrists regard ecocentric views as potentially passive and dismissive of human progress. The debate between these two perspectives reflects broader discussions on sustainability, innovation, and the ethical dimensions of human interaction with the environment, especially in light of pressing issues like climate change.
Subject Terms
Ecocentrism vs. technocentrism
Definition
“Ecocentrism” is a label for views that place at the center of moral concern the relationship of human beings to the Earth. “Technocentrism” is a label for views that explicitly or implicitly locate the center of moral concern in human technical and technological capabilities. Technocentrists see the solution for woes brought on by human ingenuity as more ingenuity, while ecocentrists in contrast believe that humans must find and respect their proper place in the world, rather than seeking to use technology to transcend it. Technocentric ambitions seem to ecocentrists to be expressions of arrogance or hubris, and ecocentric pieties seem to technocentrists to acquiesce in mysticism and passivity in the face of nature’s hard challenges.
Significance for Climate Change
In the light of the prospect of global climate change, ecocentrists tend to seek solutions that involve changing destructive practices and undoing the lifestyle choices that have brought humans to the present crisis. Technocentrists, on the other hand, tend to look for a technical fix. Julian Simon is an example of a technocentric enthusiast. For him, human beings are the ultimate resource, so the more of them there are, the better the prospects for solving the world’s problems, including environmental challenges. For those who agree with Simon, popular claims about resource scarcity—and, accordingly, calls for scaling back enterprise—sell short the fecundity of human powers of imagination and invention. To technocentrists, calls to sacrifice ambitions of development are premature, because they ignore the likelihood that seemingly overwhelming problems will yield to unforeseeable technical innovations.
The value of civilization, if not the skills that make society itself possible, has been in question at least since the reaction to the Enlightenment of the Romantic movement (growing out of the work of the Swiss-French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the English poet William Blake, among others). The German philosopher Martin Heidegger traces the woes of the modern worldview, which he refers to as “the enframing,” back to Plato and other ancient Greek thinkers. In more recent times, such thinkers as Henry David Thoreau, Aldo Leopold, Wendell Berry, Arne Naess, and various other exponents of deep ecology have called for a radical reconsideration of the place of human experience, and even of animal sentience itself, in the vast, interconnected web of nature.
Though their call for a better relation to nature predates concern with global warming, the dire consequences of climate change constitute for ecocentrists an object lesson in human arrogance and exploitation. On this view, salvation from human folly is to be found only in a pared-down existence: a life simpler, closer to the soil, and more local in scale and scope. What is wrong can only be fixed by relinquishing human presumption and acquiescing in limits that are natural, if not divine. This view accordingly holds that “small is beautiful,” and urges people to reduce their carbon footprint.
For their technocentric opponents, such attitudes not only underestimate human creativity in meeting challenges and solving problems but also sacrifice too readily the prospects of socially disadvantaged individuals and groups: Economic opportunity and social justice, they believe, will require continuation on the path of development and discovery. Moreover, it may seem presumptuous to believe humans could possibly encompass within their time-bound minds all of the relevant aspects and possibilities. For technocentrists, the imperative is to continue to re-create the world in humanity’s own, reasonable image, while for the ecocentrists, it is to rethink fundamentally humanity’s place in the world.
Bibliography
Abdou, Doaa M. Salman and Yasser Tawfik Halim. "Balancing Technocentric and Ecocentric Approaches: Integrating Ethnocultural Perspectives in Environmental Policies of Finland and Bhutan." MSA-Management Sciences Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, Aug. 2024, pp. 17-28, DOI:10.21608/msamsj.2024.282720.1061. Accessed 26 Dec. 2024.
"Ecocentrism & Technocentrism." Sustainable Environment, http://www.sustainable-environment.org.uk/Earth/Ecocentrism‗and‗Technocentrism.php. Accessed 26 Dec. 2024.
Ehrenfeld, David. The Arrogance of Humanism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Kunstler, James Howard. The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2005.
Naess, Arne. The Ecology of Wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. Edited by Alan R. Drengson. New York: Counterpoint, 2008.
Ponting, Clive. A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations. Rev. and expanded ed. New York: Penguin, 2007.
Quinn, Daniel. Beyond Civilization: Humanity’s Next Great Adventure. New York: Crown, 2000.
Rodman, John. “The Liberation of Nature.” Inquiry 20, no. 1 (1977): 83-145.
Simon, Julian. The Ultimate Resource 2. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Zerzan, John. Twilight of the Machines. Port Townsend, Wash.: Feral House, 2008.
Zimmerman, Michael. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.