Locard's exchange principle

DEFINITION: Dictum holding that whenever two objects come into contact, each leaves some trace or residue on the other that careful examination can detect and identify.

SIGNIFICANCE: The principle that bears Edmond Locard’s name is usually regarded as the basis for criminalistic investigation of objective evidence of contacts relating to crimes.

Inspired by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s stories of the master detective Sherlock Holmes, as well as by the work of French biometrics researcher and law-enforcement officer Alphonse Bertillon and that of Austrian educator Hans Gross, who is credited with establishing the field of criminalistics, Edmond Locard (1877–1966) established the first modern scientific laboratory for the investigation of crime in Lyon, France, in 1910. Locard published numerous books on forensic techniques, including the six-volume magnum opus Traité de criminalistique (1931-1936; treatise on criminalistics). In essays with titles such as “Dust and Its Analysis” (Police Journal, 1928) and “The Analysis of Dust Traces” (American Journal of Police Science, 1930), Locard described his experimental work leading to the idea forensic scientists have come to refer to as Locard’s exchange principle or Locard’s theory.

89312259-73992.jpg

This principle, which ties together the diverse investigations of the forensic sciences, has been called the basis of criminalistics. Variously formulated, it is expressed most succinctly as “Every contact leaves a trace.” This applies broadly to interactions ranging from those that leave fingerprints to those that make the markings on a bullet, but it is of particular relevance to what is known as trace evidence. Locard called the microscopic particles that adhere to people’s clothing and bodies “mute witnesses, sure and faithful, of all our movements and all our encounters.”

Almost any kind of trace material can come to the attention of forensic scientists: hair, dirt, blood, fibers, and other substances. Some materials are more individualizable than others, but individuation may not be necessary to raise questions about how the presence of particular materials is to be explained. Because evidentiary use of enchanged materials depends on there being no acceptable alternative explanation for the materials being where they are, issues of chain of custody and prevention of contamination are extremely important.

The trace materials that forensic scientists analyze are ordinarily lightweight and small, even invisible to the naked eye—otherwise, the perpetrators who left them behind would have detected and removed them. Evidence often involves microscopic materials, and, as nanotechnology progresses, it is logical to expect the scale of evidentiary materials to grow smaller and smaller.

Law-enforcement investigators sometimes interpret Locard’s principle in a general way when they refer to the idea that alterations, especially mutual alterations, result from two things engaging with each other. The principle is occasionally discussed in this sense, for example, in computing forensics, in connection with the changes that occur in computers when they communicate with one another.

Bibliography

Bisbing, Richard E. “Fractured Patterns: Microscopical Investigation of Real Physical Evidence.” Modern Microscopy Journal, 29 Jan. 2004. Print.

Chisum, W. Jerry, and Brent E. Turvey. “Evidence Dynamics: Locard’s Exchange Principle and Crime Reconstruction.” Journal of Behavioral Profiling 1 (2000). Print.

Houck, Max M., ed. Mute Witnesses: Trace Evidence Analysis. San Diego: Academic, 2001. Print.

Houck, Max M., ed. Trace Evidence Analysis: More Cases in Mute Witnesses. Burlington: Elsevier, 2004. Print.

Spinney, Laura. "Long-Lost Photos Reveal Details of World's First Police Crime Lab." Nature, 5 Apr. 2024, www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01005-8. Accessed 15 Aug. 2024.

Turvey, Brent E., and Karla Valeria Baltazar. "An Introduction to Crime Scene Investigation and Reconstruction." Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis. 5th ed., Brent E. Turvey, ed., Academic Press, 2023, doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815583-7.00013-7.