National Park Service (NPS)

The U.S. Congress established the National Park Service to manage and promote the use of federal parks, monuments, and reservations. Its purpose was to ensure that the scenery, natural and historic objects, and wildlife in the parks could be enjoyed by the public and at the same time left unimpaired for future generations.

Background

Thirty-seven national parks were already in existence when Congress formed the National Park Service on August 25, 1916. The creation of Yellowstone, the first national park in the world, like that of later parks, engendered struggles between those who wanted to preserve federal lands, preservationists, and those who wanted to use them, utilitarians. In general, Congress encouraged the economic development of federal lands. Yet many different groups—preservationists, local businessmen, the railroad industry, and scientists—each with its own particular interests, were able to convince Congress to pass the Yellowstone Act in 1872, thereby preserving more than 800,000 hectares. Despite the law, Yellowstone’s pristine status was soon under attack. Conflicts continued at the end of the century: An attempt to establish a gold mine outside the park was blocked by President Bill Clinton; ranchers were upset with the reestablishment of wolves inside the park in 1995, though this venture has been considered a success by scientists and the public. Furthermore, in 2003, the government put restrictions on snowmobile use within the park.

89474781-29093.jpg

Congress used the Yellowstone Act as the basis for establishing other parks. For most of these, preservation was more theoretical than practical. For example, in Yosemite National Park, established in 1890, preservationists, including John Muir, lost a long battle to utilitarians, including Gifford Pinchot, over the flooding of the Hetch Hetchy valley to provide San Francisco with water in 1913. This loss would later be used by preservationists as a rallying cry against future attempts to impinge on the national parks. Debate about Hetch Hetchy continued into the twenty-first century.

The Antiquities Act

In 1906, Congress passed the Antiquities Act to protect federal lands of historical, scientific, and cultural interest. Congressional representative John Lacey of Iowa had recognized that scenic wonders were not the only lands worthy of preservation. Lacey’s original objective was to protect American Indian ruins and artifacts of the Southwest from looters, vandals, and other criminals. The wording of the act, however, has allowed presidents to have considerable latitude in setting aside sites as national monuments. Some national parks, including Mesa Verde and Grand Canyon, were first made into national monuments. Their conversion into national parks involved compromise, including permitting railroad rights of way, farming by American Indians, and the recognition of valid land claims and mining rights within park boundaries.

Establishment of the National Park Service

Without a central federal office coordinating national parks, many problems developed. The parks competed with one another for federal appropriations. No government agency had the authority to determine national park criteria, thus allowing local interests to convince Congress of the value of protecting natural wonders in places few people had seen. Protection of resources from economic exploitation in all parks was difficult. Congress was not interested in adding to the federal bureaucracy and establishing a new government agency to administer the parks.

The Forest Service, in the Department of Agriculture, wanted to maintain its role as a major federal landholding agency. It and the Service, in the Department of the Interior, opposed new national parks in general, since, from their viewpoint, parks overemphasized of federal lands and did not allow sufficient economic use. Years of campaigning by such men as Secretaries of the Interior Richard Ballinger, Walter Fisher, and Franklin Lane, J. Horace McFarland (president of the American Civic Association), Representative William Kent, Senator Reed Smoot, and Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. (son of Frederick Law Olmsted and a renowned landscape architect in his own right) helped to convince Congress of the value of a new agency. After much controversy, in 1916, Congress passed the National Parks Act, establishing a central authority within the Department of the Interior and stating its responsibilities.

Impact of the Park Service

The law that established the National Park Service, the Organic Act of 1916, has been interpreted in many ways, not always emphasizing conservation and preservation. The first director of the National Park Service, Stephen Mather, tried to enforce his preservationist beliefs but was not always successful. Mather worked hard to make the service a professional organization and an influential part of the Washington bureaucracy.

He also recognized that, in order to make the national park system truly national, some parks needed to be established in the East. All existing parks were in the West, but the majority of the country’s population and wealth were in the East. Although the scenery of the East was not considered as spectacular as that of the West, local groups worked with state and local governments as well as with residents to establish Shenandoah, Great Smoky Mountains, Acadia, and Mammoth Cave National Parks in the 1920s and 1930s.

Evolving Responsibilities

In 1933, the federal government expanded the role of the National Park Service to include federal lands that had been under the control of the Departments of War and Agriculture, including monuments, historic sites and buildings, and national military parks. By preserving and managing important historical sites along with natural ones, the Park Service enlarged its role and more completely fulfilled its mission of 1916.

By 2023, there were 424 national park areas in the United States. Their popularity with Americans and foreigners continues to grow, frequently resulting in damage to the very resources that the more than 300 million visitors come to enjoy each year. Because federal funds have not kept pace, the National Park Service has been forced to close sections of parks and to depend more on volunteers; in 2017, the National Park Service proposed doubling or tripling entry fees at seventeen highly popular parks in order to help finance decades of deferred maintenance. In 2018, NPS announced approval for a nominal increase in entrance fees. This additional revenue would help provide funds to address needed maintenance on infrastructure and provide an improved tourist experience. The parks are also susceptible to temporary full or partial closures during government shutdowns, such as the 35 day shutdown in 2018-2019 or the shutdowns resulting from the 2020 global COVID-19 pandemic.

The National Park Service continues to manage these unique national treasures by balancing use and preservation. One such example is its focus on resilience and sustainability to reduce environmental impact and costs associated with the park operations. This is done through partnership with the National Park Foundation. The National Park Foundation is a nonprofit organization that focuses on supporting efforts to reduce waste and conserving water and energy resources by using renewable energy.

The National Park Service also issued new guidelines in 2022 to increase cooperation between Native American Tribes, Native Alaskans, and Native Hawaiians on co-stewardship of National Park lands. The guidelines were part of a broader policy within the federal government to adopt co-stewardship policies in all federal land agencies, such as the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management.   

Bibliography

Frome, M., R. W. Waver, and P. Pritchard. “United States: National Parks.” In International Handbook of National Parks and Nature Reserves, edited by Craig W. Allin. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990.

Gee, Alastair. "Rotting Cabins, Closed Trails: Why We're Shining a Light on US National Parks." The Guardian, 29 Jan. 2018, www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jan/29/national-parks-repair-backlog-grand-canyon-zion. Accessed 19 Feb. 2018.

Grusin, Richard. Culture, Technology, and the Creation of America’s National Parks. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Heacox, Kim. An American Idea: The Making of the National Parks. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society, 2001.

Lomax, Becky. USA National Parks. Avalon, 2022.

Mason, Kathy S. Natural Museums: U.S. National Parks, 1872-1916. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2004.

Mateo, Rony, ed. American National Parks: Current Issues and Developments. New York: Novinka Books, 2004.

"National Park Service Announces Plan to Address Infrastructure Needs & Improve Visitor Experience." National Park Service. 2018, www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/04-12-2018-entrance-fees.htm. Accessed 2 May 2024.

“National Park Service Issues New Policy Guidance to Strengthen Tribal Co-Stewardship of National Park Lands and Waters.” National Park Service, 13 Dec. 2022, www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/national-park-service-issues-new-policy-guidance-to-strengthen-tribal-co-stewardship-of-national-park-lands-and-waters.htm. Accessed 2 May 2024.

"Resilience & Sustainability." National Park Foundation. www.nationalparks.org/area-of-work/resilience-sustainability. Accessed 2 May 2024.

Ridenour, James M. The National Parks Compromised: Pork Barrel Politics and America’s Treasures. Merrillville, Ind.: ICS Books, 1994.

Runte, Alfred. National Parks: The American Experience. 4th ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2010.

Whiteman, David. “The National Park System.” In Federal Land Management Agencies, edited by Pamela D. Baldwin. New York: Novinka Books, 2005.