Crime labs
Crime labs play a critical role in the criminal justice system by processing and analyzing physical evidence from crime scenes. Funded primarily by government agencies, such as the FBI and local law enforcement, as well as some private entities, these labs employ skilled criminalists, many of whom hold advanced degrees in scientific fields. The analyses conducted in crime labs encompass a wide range of tasks, including DNA profiling, fingerprint analysis, and the identification of trace evidence, which are essential in linking suspects to crimes or confirming victim identities.
Despite their importance, crime labs face significant challenges, including overwhelming caseloads, which can lead to substantial backlogs and delays in analysis results. This situation has real-world implications, potentially allowing guilty individuals to evade justice while innocent suspects may remain wrongfully detained. Additionally, there have been notable concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of lab results, with past incidents of faulty analyses contributing to wrongful convictions. In response, there is a growing movement towards accrediting crime labs to ensure adherence to quality standards, thereby enhancing the integrity of forensic science. Overall, crime labs are vital yet complex components of the criminal justice landscape, balancing the need for timely and accurate forensic analysis with the constraints of resources and quality assurance.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Crime labs
SIGNIFICANCE: Crime labs process, analyze, and sometimes collect physical evidence from crimes and crime scenes. As the field of criminalistics has become increasingly important within the criminal justice system, crime labs have provided the expertise to use and understand scientific methods of analysis of evidence.
Most crime labs are funded and administered by governmental agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), state departments of justice, and local law-enforcement agencies. There are also private, for-profit crime labs. The criminalists who work within crime labs typically have degrees in chemistry, biology, and other sciences, and often have masters and doctoral degrees.
Crime labs perform a wide variety of analyses. One of their most common tasks now is DNA analysis. Among other things, DNA analysis is done to identify criminal offenders and crime victims. DNA analysis can be performed on body tissues and on body fluids, such as blood, saliva, and semen. Other common crime labs tasks include fingerprint analysis; identification of trace evidence such as clothing fibers and paint particles; screening of body fluids for alcohol, drugs, and toxins; identification and matching of firearms and ammunition; identification and matching of marks made by hammers, screwdrivers, saws, and other tools; and analysis of written documents, such as matching handwriting samples to those of suspects. Depending on the types of analysis being performed, criminalists use a wide variety of scientific equipment and techniques.
Modern Challenges
As crime labs become increasingly important in the investigation of crime, they face a growing number of challenges. One of these is overwhelming caseloads and limited personnel and budgets. In 2020, for example, the 423 crime labs and lab systems in the United States received more than 3.3 million requests for services. These labs had a backlog of 710,900 requests that had not been reviewed thirty days after submission. As a result of these backlogs and contrary to what is often depicted on television shows such as CSI, it often takes well over a month for a real-life law-enforcement agency to obtain results of scientific analysis. This contributes to slowing down the criminal justice system’s response to crimes. The delays allow some guilty people to escape justice, while innocent suspects may be detained for longer periods of time.
Another challenge that crime labs face is the quality of their work. The first years of the twenty-first century have seen a number of high-profile incidents involving crime labs and crime lab employees that have provided false and misleading results. These problems have been caused by such factors as high caseloads and inadequate personnel training and supervision. Faulty crime lab analyses are particularly troubling because they can lead to mistaken convictions of innocent people. In fact, according to the Innocence Project , defective and fraudulent science was a major contributor to the false convictions of dozens of men for crimes as serious as murder and rape. Some of these innocent men even received death sentences, and many of them spent long years in prison.
In response to the problem of bad science, there has been a recent trend toward accrediting crime labs. Under a formal accreditation process, an external agency such as the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors audits and inspects labs. The accrediting agency checks for such things as proper employee education and training, availability of appropriate equipment and space, and correct evidence handling and analysis techniques. In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice has published several reports providing guidelines on forensic science training and techniques.
Accreditation and guidelines are likely to do little to help alleviate the backlogs in lab work. However, they should improve the accuracy and quality of the labs’ work, thus leading to more accurate crime investigations.
Bibliography
Brooks, Connor. “Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2020.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, December 2023, bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/publicly-funded-forensic-crime-laboratories-2020. Accessed 25 June 2024.
"Fifty Largest Crime Labs, 2002." Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1 Sept. 2004, bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/50-largest-crime-labs-2002. Accessed 25 June 2024.
Evans, C. The Casebook of Forensic Detection: How Science Solved One Hundred of the World’s Most Baffling Crimes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
Genge, N. The Forensic Casebook: The Science of Crime Scene Investigation. Beverly Hills: Ballantine Books, 2002.
Lee, H., T. O’Neil, and C. Gill. Cracking Cases: The Science of Solving Crimes. 2002. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2009.
National Institute of Justice. Education and Training in Forensic Science: A Guide for Forensic Science Laboratories, Educational Institutions, and Students. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, 2004.