Defendants

SIGNIFICANCE: The American criminal justice system is designed to pit litigants against one another in virtual fights for justice. Criminal justice procedures attempt to balance defendants’ rights and government’s interests in speedy and efficient trials with the desire for justice. The rules of criminal procedure are therefore designed to ensure that defendants’ rights are protected.

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants to all defendants the right to speedy and public trials decided by impartial juries in the states and districts in which the crimes are alleged to have been committed. The Sixth Amendment also grants accused persons the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against them, to be confronted by witnesses against them, to present witnesses of their own to testify on their behalf, and to consult with attorneys.

95342825-20171.jpg95342825-20170.jpg

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution grants defendants the right not to be tried more than once for the same crimes (the double jeopardy clause), the right not to testify against themselves (self-incrimination clause), and the right to established courses of judicial proceedings designed to protect the legal rights of citizens (due process clause). These are all federal constitutional protections that states can supplement but cannot take away.

Defendants are subject to criminal or civil procedures depending on whether they are accused of violating criminal or civil statutes. The rules of criminal procedure differ from those of civil procedure because criminal and civil proceedings have different objectives and results. Criminal cases involve violations of criminal law, while civil cases involve violations of tort law, such as negligence and wrongfulness. In criminal cases, the states bring the suit against defendants and must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt . By contrast, in civil cases, private citizens and organizations bring the suits against defendants, and they are required only to show that the defendants are liable by a preponderance of the evidence.

Bibliography

Abramson, Leslie, with Richard Flaste. The Defense Is Ready: Life in the Trenches of Criminal Law. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997.

Acker, J. R., and D. C. Brody. Criminal Procedure: A Contemporary Perspective. 2d ed. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett, 2004.

Ingram, Jefferson L. Criminal Procedure: Theory and Practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 2005.

Miller, Kathryn E. "Criminal Defendants Have Limited Ability to Make Meaningful Choices, Especially in Capital Trials." Law Review, Death Penalty Information Center, 12 July 2022, deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/law-review-criminal-defendants-have-limited-ability-to-make-meaningful-choices-especially-in-capital-trials. Accessed 25 June 2024.

Strom, Samuel. "The Right to Counsel." FindLaw, 20 Oct. 2023, www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-rights/the-right-to-counsel.html. Accessed 25 June 2024.