Flashbulb memory

A flashbulb memory is the memory of the moment that one learned about a surprising, important, and emotionally charged event. Flashbulb memories have been compared to photographic snapshots because they are full of vivid details and can remain with a person for long time. Despite these qualities, however, researchers have found that flashbulb memories are somewhat incomplete, selective, and often inaccurate.

90558331-100654.jpg

Scientists study flashbulb memories and other types of memories to further understanding of how the brain works. Studies of how flashbulb memories are formed and retained in the brain may also help researchers develop treatments for conditions that involve memory loss, such as Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, or that are caused by memories of traumatic events, such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

Overview

The term “flashbulb memory” was first used by Harvard University researchers Roger Brown and James Kulik in their 1977 paper “Flashbulb Memories,” published in the journal Cognition. In their paper, they discussed the way that people remembered where they were, what they were doing, and whom they were with when they heard that President John F. Kennedy had been shot in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Brown and Kulik reported that while news of the Kennedy assassination was an instigating event for particularly strong and common flashbulb memories, they found that other events could create similarly vivid, detailed, and long-lasting memories. Moreover, such memories only seemed to form when the piece of news was highly surprising and consequential, and perhaps accompanied by a strong emotional response to the news. The high degree of surprise and consequence affects how often the memory is rehearsed and therefore the amount of detail that can be recalled and how accessible it is.

Since 1977, different researchers have debated Brown and Kulik’s theory and proposed different models to explain how and why flashbulb memories form. These include the structural equation model conceived by Conway et al. in 1994, and the two-path model proposed by Finkenauer et al. in 1998. Brown and Kulik’s model is the photographic model, which hypothesizes that the process by which the flashbulb memory is formed follows a sequence: first, surprise; then, realization of what has changed because of the event and why it matters to the subject; and finally, the subject’s emotional response based on realization of the consequences of the event. Although the other models agree on the determinants of flashbulb memories, they differ about which factor or factors are most important to the formation and maintenance of flashbulb memories and how they are related and work together.

Bibliography

Brown, Roger, and James Kulik. “Flashbulb Memories.” Cognition 5.1 (1977): 73–99. Print.

Chen, Ingfei. “A Feeling for the Past.” Scientific American Mind Jan./Feb. 2012: 24–31. Print.

Conway, Martin A. Flashbulb Memories. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1995. Print.

Curci, Antonietta, and Tiziana Lanciano. “Features of Autobiographical Memory: Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Measurement of Flashbulb Memory.” Journal of General Psychology 136.2 (2009): 129–52. Print.

Kraha, A., and A. Boals. “Why So Negative? Positive Flashbulb Memories for a Personal Event.” Memory 24 May 2013: n.pag. Web. 20 Sept. 2013.

Luminet, Olivier, and Antonietta Curci, eds. Flashbulb Memories: New Issues and New Perspectives. Hove: Psychology, 2009. Print.

Miller, Greg. “Making Memories.” Smithsonian May 2010: 38–45. Print.

Pillemer, D. B. “Clarifying Flashbulb Memory Concept: Comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119.1 (1990): 92–96. Print.

Weisberg, Robert W., and Lauretta Reeves. Cognition: From Memory to Creativity. Hoboken: Wiley, 2013. Print.

Winter, Alison. “Flashbulb Memories.” Memory: Fragments of a Modern History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2012. 157–78. Print.