In forma pauperis
"In forma pauperis" is a legal principle that allows individuals who cannot afford to pay court fees to file motions or complaints without incurring costs. This provision is important for ensuring that access to the judicial system is available to all citizens, regardless of their financial situation. When a person qualifies for in forma pauperis status, the state or federal government covers the associated expenses, which may also include providing legal assistance. This process is applicable at both state and federal levels, and the filings are generally treated with confidentiality.
Eligibility for in forma pauperis assistance is typically determined by income, with specific standards varying by jurisdiction. Individuals receiving public assistance or food stamps, as well as incarcerated persons without financial resources, are often eligible for this provision. A landmark case related to this principle is Gideon v. Wainwright, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that defendants have the right to legal counsel regardless of their financial status. This ruling highlighted the critical importance of the in forma pauperis principle in upholding the rights of individuals in the legal system.
On this Page
Subject Terms
In forma pauperis
SIGNIFICANCE: The legal principle of in forma pauperis allows defendants experiencing poverty to file motions or complaints in courts without cost. The purpose of this provision is to make courts accessible to all citizens, regardless of their means.
When a person seeking help from a court cannot afford to pay the standard fees, the costs are covered by the state or federal government. In such cases, the normal costs are waived by the court, which might also provide a person experiencing poverty assistance of an attorney. In forma pauperis petitions are available at both the state and federal levels. In forma pauperis filings are generally considered to be confidential. When trial courts accept them, the applicants’ eligibility for relief continues through any appellate proceedings that follow the initial court actions.
Eligibility for in forma pauperis help is based on income, and the standards may vary widely. However, in most states, persons receiving public assistance or using food stamps are generally eligible to file in forma pauperis. The principle also applies to people incarcerated in state and federal prisons who are without resources.
The best-known in forma pauperis criminal case was the US Supreme Court’s Gideon v. Wainwright ruling in 1963. The case originated when Clarence Gideon was tried for burglary. He asked for an attorney at his trial but was denied and was eventually convicted. While in prison, he filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court, arguing that he had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The court accepted his in forma pauperis petition and heard the matter. In a 9–0 vote, the justices agreed with Gideon and reversed his conviction. The court stated that the issue Gideon’s case raised was of such broad significance that it made its ruling retroactive—something virtually unheard of.
Bibliography
Galloway, Russell W. Justice for All? The Rich and Poor in Supreme Court History, 1790-1990. 2d ed. Carolina Academic Press, 1991.
"In Forma Pauperis." LII Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, Jan. 2023, www.law.cornell.edu/wex/in‗forma‗pauperis. Accessed 11 July 2024.
Lewis, Anthony. Gideon’s Trumpet. Vintage Books, 1989.
"Pleading Poverty in Federal Court." The Yale Law Journal, vol. 128, no. 6, 2019, pp. 1478–91, www.yalelawjournal.org/article/pleading-poverty-in-federal-court. Accessed 11 July 2024.
Reiman, Jeffrey. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice. 7th ed. Allyn & Bacon, 2004.