Hashtag Activism

Overview

"Hashtag activism" refers to the use of social media to advance, support, debate about, or reflect on social causes. While the term is most commonly used in relation to "X" (formerly Twitter), it has also been applied to the general act of activism on social media platforms including Facebook and Instagram. Because it is based on social media platforms, hashtag activism has been used as part of a diversity of activist projects across the world. In some cases, the instance of hashtag activism is very small, and in other cases, such as #BringBackOurGirls, hashtag activism has been used to draw international attention to a local problem with global ramifications.

Hashtag activism is unique in that it brings together so many different supporters, often from communities that would not otherwise have come into contact. Through hashtag activism, a movement can have international support within moments or gather the support of celebrities that the activists would not otherwise have been able to reach. Tombleson and Wolf (2017) write that large campaigns that support broad issues can gather supporters from around the world using hashtag activism. This has the potential to quickly grow a movement, and activists need to be prepared to respond just as quickly to maximize their growth.

Some of the earliest academic studies of hashtag use by activists focus on the use of "X" during the 2011 Occupy Wall Street demonstrations. At this time, activists were using social media to coordinate their next activities, find supporters, and avert the police. Deluca, Lawson, and Sun (2012) write that this was a defining moment when activists shifted from traditional media to new media to organize and advertise their activities. The researchers argue that this shift to social media, including the use of hashtag activism encouraged new contexts in which activism could occur, as well as created a new expectation for how activists and socially minded citizens could and should participate in social causes and public debate. Occupy Wall Street also identified the ways that social media platforms could be used to change the concept of a collective identity and an advocacy organization. The protests, which occurred first in New York but quickly spread throughout America and internationally, demonstrated a new way for activists to collectivize and work together to both define and advance a social movement (Kavada, 2015). Even after the Occupy Wall Street protests had ended, the activists who had participated through social media were still linked over social media and continued to support a diversity of causes.

Other, earlier studies focus on the use of hashtags by activists during the 2010 Arab Spring. Sometimes referred to as the "revolutions which were tweeted," the use of "X" and hashtag activism has ben widely studied both by scholars who wish to understand how the revolutions began and were spread, and by those who wish to be ready for the next waves of revolutions. Wilson and Dunn (2011) have utilized a data set of social media posts from the Egyptian revolution to understand the ways that protesters used hashtags such as #25jan to call together protesters and call attention to the revolution. This use of a hashtag by activists might not be considered "hashtag activism" by scholars because the use of the hashtag itself was not the act of activism. Instead, the hashtag was used to identify activists and coordinate activities occurring elsewhere.

What makes hashtag activism standout is that posting with the hashtag is the act of activism. For example, the #BringBackOurGirls campaign was designed to put pressure on the Nigerian government to find and return the more than two hundred schoolgirls who had been kidnapped by the militant group Boko Haram. During this campaign, many celebrities and average citizens posted images of themselves holding a piece of paper with #BringBackOurGirls written on it. The first recorded tweet using this hashtag was by former First Lady Michelle Obama. Soon, more than two million retweets had been posted. Many of those tweeters lacked the political capital of Obama. They could not travel to Nigeria to look for the girls, and they might not have attended a protest or rally or sent letters to the Nigerian embassy. Instead, through the use of hashtag activism, they were able to show their support for the kidnapped girls and their families and demand that the Nigerian government devote more resources to ensure their return. In 2017, eighty-two of the girls were released after negotiations with Boko Haram. Although several more girls were later found, by 2022, more than one hundred were still held by the group.

Among the most famous instances of hashtag activism are the American #BlackLivesMatter, Canadian #IdleNoMore, and Hong Kong #UmbrellaRevolution and the international #metoo. Each of these projects is similar in that the hashtag is used to press for social change and awareness, but they are different in the communities and actions they are designed to address. They are also different in the ways that they have begun. #BlackLivesMatter calls attention to police brutality and racism against African Americans. This hashtag was first used when George Zimmerman was acquitted during his trial for killing Trayvon Martin, a teenager who had been walking through his neighborhood. The hashtag has since been revived several times to mark and respond to the killing of other African Americans such as Michael Brown who was killed by a police officer in Missouri, and Eric Garner who was killed by a police officer in New York City. The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag is not always used alone. For example, after Michael Brown's death, it was common for tweeters to use both #BlackLivesMatter and #Ferguson (the city in which Brown lived) in their tweets. Yang (2016) writes that the collection of these tweets produces a community narrative from which we can better understand activism that occurred after each of these instances. Similarly, Cumberbatch and Trujillo-Pagán (2016) write that instances of hashtag activism such as #BlackLivesMatter are useful ways to question and combat derogatory narratives about minority communities. They argue that the instantaneous nature of hashtag posting and distribution, as well as the ability to reach a broad range of supporters means that hashtag activism is able to change and expand the notion of what it means to participate in a protest or support a social cause. Put another way, hashtag activism is exceptionally fast, and due to its speed allows movements to grow much quicker than older social movements or protests.

While some instances of hashtag activism are positively oriented, meaning that they support an individual or group, others are negatively oriented in that they draw attention to the misdeeds of an individual or group. For example, the campaign #PaulasBestDishes was a parody of Paula Deen, a celebrity cook. This parody was used in part to encourage the firing of Paula Deen after she made derogatory comments about African Americans. Many of the tweets which were posted parodied popular southern foods with new names which addressed racism. Vats (2015) writes that #PaulasBestDishes became a way to examine and reject Paula Deen specifically and racism generally. Focusing on food, and the rhetoric of food, this hashtag was able to launch new discussions regarding the ways that African American experiences, classism, and racism are discussed in contemporary society and mass media. In the short term, hashtag #PaulasBestDishes has been attributed to Paula Deen's firing. In the long term, this hashtag has also been credited with brining together a new community which can debate about social issues and press for more inclusive and responsible representations on television programs and mass media in general.

Further Insights

Instances of hashtag activism have created a new and interesting pool of research for academics. Oftentimes it is difficult for a researcher to be in the exact right place at the exact right moment to experience and document a protest or revolution. However, hashtag activism allows researchers to be present at the beginning of a movement, track the movement from their offices, and reflect on the event over a long period of time. Because it is possible to search the archive of tweets, researchers can go back and find the first instance of hashtag activism on a new topic, even if they personally missed the first posting. This availability is important for scholars who want to research new topics. It is also very important for the development of research that addresses a range of activities and social groups. Hashtag activism has encouraged many people, including those who are economically or socially disadvantaged, to participate in social justice campaigns. As they do so, and their activities are documented and recorded through "X," they enlarge the diversity of subjects which academics can study.

Issues

While scholars are interested in the ways that hashtag activism brings together communities, they are concerned about what happens after the hashtag is posted. Some scholars argue that hashtag activism supports social causes because it raises awareness and broadens support for a particular cause. Other scholars, however, argue that hashtag activism allows individuals to feel as though they have made a meaningful contribution to society while actually doing very little. These scholars refer to instances of online activism, such as hashtag activism, as "slacktivism." Researchers, such Kwak et al. (2018), have attempted to test this idea of slacktivism by tracking the ways that individuals used social media during the 2016 presidential election and how that participation correlates with off-line political participation at events such as marches, protests, and voting. Through this study, Kwak et al.'s team has shown that online participation is correlated with off-line participation.

Duarte and Vigil-Hayes (2017) have studied the ways that hashtag activism occurred and was used during the 2016 presidential election They followed the use of thirty-three Native American activists and examined the ways in which they used "X" to advance social issues and comment on political campaigns. Their analysis accounted for both the issues with which these activists were concerned and the limitations that the activists face, such as slow internet bandwidth on Native American reservations. These researchers found that the hashtag #indigenous has been used to collectivize a wide array of social causes and experiences which affect Native American communities. In addition to supporting a specific cause or way of life, Duarte and Vigil-Hayes also argue that collectivizing activists through "X" is a way to decolonize – or to break the controls of the national government which regulate the activities of Native Americans. In this way, hashtag activism, through #indigenous has been used to support a general movement rather than a specific act of injustice. In the future, communications scholars researching indigenous issues will be able to search for #indigenous and find the many ways that activists have used this hashtag to label and promote their activities. This is a new form of organizing diverse protests and organizations and may open up new research projects for communication scholars who wish to understand cross cultural communication networks and practices.

While the hashtag #indigenous addresses a plethora of topics, some hashtags are very specific. For example, some scholars have studied how specific hashtags are linked to traditional forms of activism and protest. For example, there are many studies of the ways that athletes display political symbols or salutes during their games. During a 2014 St. Louis Rams game, five athletes made the "hands up" gesture which was associated with the death of Michael Brown and associated with #BlackLivesMatter. These athletes were responding to and participating in the movement around #BlackLivesMatter. In the athletes' gesture there was a connection between a national event, an instance of hashtag activism, and a in-person gesture of support on a national stage. This was interesting to scholars who want to understand how these many different types of media are joined together into a large, complex movement. However, for some viewers of this 2014 football game, the players' gesture was offensive and led to a new instance of hashtag activism, #BoycottRams. This hashtag was used by former fans of the Rams—a franchise that moved to Los Angeles in 2016—who did not attend games or buy team merchandise as a protest against the political activism of the Rams players. As Sanderson, Frederick, and Stocz's (2016) study indicates, instances such as the #BoycottRams campaign demonstrate the complexity of hashtag activism, the ways that in-person and online activism are connected, and how one instance of activism can spark another. The #BoycottRams event also demonstrates a moment when two instances of hashtag activism, #BoycottRams and #BlackLivesMatter came into conflict with one another. Communications scholars have traditionally studied what happens when in-person political movements clash in a street, stadium, or parade. This new form of clash, which occurred entirely online, opened up new ways for scholars to think about activism, interaction between opposing groups, and the ways that social media platforms are changing communicative norms.

Bibliography

Chibok schoolgirl freed in Nigeria seven years after Boko Haram kidnap, governor says. (2021, August 7). The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/07/chibok-schoolgirl-freed-in-nigeria-seven-years-after-boko-haram-kidnap-governor-says.

Chong, M. (2023, Apr. 8). Calling for justice with #JusticeforBreonnaTaylor: A case study of hashtag activism in the evolution of the black lives matter movement. Social Networking Analysis and Mining, 13(67), doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01054-3

Cumberbatch, P., & Trujillo-Pagán, N. (2016). Hashtag activism and why# BlackLivesMatter in (and to) the classroom. Radical Teacher, (106), 78.

DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy Wall Street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(4), 483–509.

Duarte, M.E. & Vigil-Hayes, M. (2017). #Indigenous: A technical and decolonial analysis of activist uses of hashtags across social movements. Mediatropes, 7(1), 166–184.

Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: social media, the Occupy Movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886.

Kwak, N., Lane, D. S., Weeks, B. E., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Bachleda, S. (2018). Perceptions of social media for politics: Testing the slacktivism hypothesis. Human Communication Research, 44(2), 197–221.

Sanderson, J., Frederick, E., & Stocz, M. (2016). When athlete activism clashes with group values: Social identity threat management via social media. Mass Communication & Society, 19(3), 301–322.

Tombleson, B., & Wolf, K. (2017). Rethinking the circuit of culture: How participatory culture has transformed cross-cultural communication. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 14–25.

Vats, A. (2015). Cooking up hashtag activism: #PaulasBestDishes and counternarratives of southern food. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 12(2), 209–213. doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2015.1014184

Wilson, C., & Dunn, A. (2011). The Arab Spring | Digital media in the Egyptian revolution: Descriptive analysis from the Tahrir data set. International Journal of Communication, 5, 25.

Yang, G. (2016). Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of# BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13.