Indian Child Welfare Act
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), enacted in 1978, sets forth federal standards aimed at protecting the welfare of American Indian children. It restricts the removal of these children from their families and prioritizes placements within their extended families or tribal members, rather than in non-American Indian homes. The Act seeks to address historical injustices, as many American Indian children were previously taken from their families by state welfare agencies, leading to significant social disruption within Native communities. By transferring jurisdiction over child welfare cases to tribal courts, the ICWA affirms the authority and integrity of American Indian tribes in matters concerning their children.
The law recognizes the importance of cultural and familial connections in the upbringing of American Indian children and prioritizes their placement in culturally relevant environments. Key legal challenges have shaped the ICWA, including the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. Brackeen (2023), which upheld the Act against claims of unconstitutionality, reinforcing the federal government's role in protecting the rights of Indigenous families. This context highlights the ongoing significance of the ICWA in advocating for the rights of American Indian children and their families amidst broader discussions about child welfare and cultural preservation.
On this Page
Indian Child Welfare Act
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), passed into law in 1978, establishes minimum federal standards for the removal of American Indian children from their families and the placement of these children in foster or adoptive homes. In essence, the act restricts the placement of American Indian children in non-American Indian homes and gives jurisdiction to tribal courts in deciding matters of child welfare involving adoptive or foster placement. The law removes state jurisdiction in most American Indian child welfare cases, even when problems occur off the reservation.
The law affirms the continued existence and the integrity of American Indian tribes and was specifically designed to end discriminatory practices of state and county welfare agencies which disregarded Indian extended family arrangements and placed large numbers of American Indian children in non-American Indian homes. Senate hearings conducted in 1974 documented evidence that as many as 25 percent of American Indian children were being systematically removed from their natural families. This in turn was causing the breakup of American Indian families and a high degree of social disruption in American Indian communities.
The law provides that when foster care or adoption is necessary, the child’s extended family has first priority to assume custody. If no extended family member is available, a member of the child’s tribe or an American Indian from another tribe has priority over non-Indians.
The US Supreme Court ruled in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl (2013) that ICWA does not cover cases in which a biological parent abandons an American Indian child before birth and does not have custody. In Haaland v. Brackeen (2023) the Supreme Court upheld the ICWA, after a federal judge declared the Act unconstitutional. Considered a major win for Native American rights, the ruling indicated that federal mandates are prohibited from being imposed on areas of power that are traditionally state-regulated, such as those concerning family law.
Bibliography
Cross, Terry L. “The Indian Child Welfare Act: We Must Still Fight for Our Children.” Reclaiming Children & Youth 23.2 (2014): 23–24. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Apr. 2015.
Di Palma, Jessica. “Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl: The Supreme Court’s Distorted Interpretation of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 47.2 (2014): 523–538. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Apr. 2015.
“Indian Child Welfare Act—Termination of Parental Rights—Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl.” Harvard Law Review 127.1 (2013): 368–377. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Apr. 2015.
McCarthy, Philip (Jay), Jr. “The Oncoming Storm: State Indian Child Welfare Act Laws and the Clash of Tribal, Parental, and Child Rights.” Jour. of Law & Family Studies 15.1 (2013): 43–55. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Apr. 2015.
Stevenson, Allyson. “Vibrations across a Continent: The 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act and the Politicization of First Nations Leaders in Saskatchewan.” Amer. Indian Quarterly 37.1/2 (2013): 218–236. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Apr. 2015.
Totenberg, Nina and Meghanlata Gupta. NPR, 15 June 2023, www.npr.org/2023/06/15/1182121455/indian-child-welfare-act-supreme-court-decision. Accessed 2 Aug. 2023.