Knowledge worker
A knowledge worker is an individual engaged in the knowledge-based economy, which marks a shift from traditional economic stages like agriculture and manufacturing to a focus on information and knowledge generation. This economic model arises from the idea that supply of goods and services now surpasses demand, necessitating the inclusion of high-value knowledge in products or their creation to differentiate them in the marketplace. Common examples of knowledge workers include software engineers and programmers, who often thrive in creative environments that encourage innovation.
The scope of knowledge work varies globally, influenced by historical and cultural contexts, with some regions emphasizing creative media or advanced banking, while others might focus on traditional crafts like jewelry or rug-making. Despite these differences, all knowledge work shares a common trait: it relies on asymmetrical knowledge to create unique products that appeal to consumers. Essential to this type of work is the freedom to explore, experiment, and sometimes fail, as the success of innovations is often unpredictable.
However, the dynamics of fostering creativity within organizational structures can present challenges, particularly when companies seek to harness workers' creativity while also retaining the benefits. This complexity can sometimes lead to tensions in workplace culture, specifically regarding individual performance and compensation versus collective solidarity among colleagues. Critics also point out that the outcomes of knowledge work may generate demands for unique products that lack intrinsic value, raising questions about sustainability and resource allocation in this evolving economic landscape.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Knowledge worker
A knowledge worker is a person who works in the knowledge-based economy, or knowledge economy, which is believed to be the next step of economic development in the progression from agriculture to manufacturing to services and then to information or knowledge. The existence of the knowledge economy is predicated on the fact that in most consumer goods markets, supply of goods and services now exceeds demand and so, for sales to take place, some form of high-value knowledge should be embedded in the product involved or in its creation. This allows the product to be differentiated from its competitors and hence to appeal to consumers more, because it provides a value proposition.


Overview
The types of activity included in the knowledge economy vary from country to country, reflecting different historical and cultural factors that have contributed to the production of unique items. While in Western countries the knowledge economy is expected to concentrate on media or creative productions, information provision in advanced banking products, and so forth, in other countries the knowledge might be related to jewelry creation or rug-making. The concept of knowledge work is the same in both cases, since they feature the use of knowledge that is asymmetrically available—whether from the heritage of a long tradition of artisanship or through sophisticated dredging of databases—in order to produce items that are unique in a way that appeals to consumers. Put another way, this indicates that the knowledge economy is not quite such a modern concept as it might sometimes be portrayed.
Irrespective of the type of knowledge used, there are some characteristics of the nature of knowledge work that unite all those people involved in it. First, there must be some degree of freedom in the process of working that permits more information gathering, experimentation, and innovation and the recognition therefore that this can lead to failure from time to time. No one can predict accurately what innovations will succeed in the marketplace, which is evident from the number of new product failures associated with even the best-resourced companies in consumer goods markets. There should therefore be some freedom for the knowledge worker and different criteria for determining personal success.
Since people learn in different ways, there should also be some latitude in hours and workplace behavior. This is well known in high-tech firms in the United States, for example, which encourage many kinds of nonstandard behavior at work as a means of stimulating creativity. There is, nevertheless, something of a contradiction inherent in companies requiring designated individuals to be creative to order, especially when the company expects to retain all the benefits of that creativity. Individual compensation deals and performance assessments are common in this kind of arrangement and can lead to some lack of solidarity with colleagues.
There is an argument that the benefits of the products of knowledge workers are in fact useless, because they stimulate otherwise nonexistent demand by creating unique items that have no other appeal other than their unique nature. In such cases, the knowledge workers involved are wasteful of resources and the process unsustainable.
Bibliography
Drucker, Peter F. “Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge.” California Management Review 41.2 (1999): 79–94. Print.
Elliott, Larry, and Dan Atkinson. Fantasy Island: Waking Up to the Incredible Economic, Political and Social Illusions of the Blair Legacy. London: Constable, 2007. Print.
Horibe, Frances. Managing Knowledge Workers: New Skills and Attitudes to Unlock the Intellectual Capital in your Organization. New York: Wiley, 1999. Print.
Jemielniak, Dariusz. The New Knowledge Workers. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2012. Print.
Liu, Alan. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2004. Print.
O’Brien, James, and George Marakas. Management Information Systems. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010. Pint.
Reinhardt, W., et al. “Knowledge Worker Roles and Actions—Results of Two Empirical Studies.” Knowledge and Process Management 18.3 (2011): 150–174. Print.