Leader Member Exchange
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory explores the dynamics of relationships between leaders and their subordinates, categorizing these relationships into two distinct groups: in-group and out-group. In-group members experience stronger connections with their leaders, receiving greater responsibilities, rewards, and involvement in decision-making processes. They have access to more resources and support, fostering a collaborative environment that encourages motivation and satisfaction. Conversely, out-group members are characterized by limited interaction and support from their leaders, often adhering strictly to formal job requirements without the benefit of additional recognition or opportunities.
The theory, developed in the 1970s, suggests that relationships progress through three stages: role-taking, role-making, and routinization. During role-taking, leaders assess the skills of new members, which influences their eventual classification into either the in-group or out-group. The role-making stage involves collaborative tasks that allow leaders to further evaluate team members. Finally, routinization solidifies the established relationship dynamics. Overall, LMX highlights the importance of interpersonal relationships in leadership and their impact on employee engagement and performance, emphasizing how these dynamics can shape organizational culture and effectiveness.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Leader Member Exchange
Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory is founded on the notion that leaders form relationships with their subordinates that fall into two broad groups: an in-group characterized by strong exchange relationships, and an out-group that lacks solid leader connections. The members of the in-group are given greater responsibilities, rewards, and recognition while enjoying a larger degree of latitude in their roles compared with the out-group. They also tend to have access to the leader’s inner circle of communication. Conversely, out-group members are kept outside the leader’s inner circle and receive less attention, are given fewer rewards, and are subject to more formal rules and policies.
Overview
The leader-member exchange theory originated in the 1970s to explain the individual relationships between a leader and each of his or her subordinates. There are usually significant differences in the quantity and quality of each connection. Early on, the leader instigates either an in-group or an out-group exchange relationship with each member of the group.
LMX theory contends that the relationships between leaders and subordinates are formed through three progressive stages: role-taking, role-making, and routinization. Role-taking occurs when a new member first joins the team and the leader assesses his or her skills and abilities. In the role-making stage, a new team member starts to work on projects and tasks, enabling the leader to observe the member’s skills and ethics and place the new member mentally into either the in-group or out-group. In the final stage, routines between the leader and the team member are established. Once an individual has been classified as a member of the in-group or out-group in the leader’s mind, the classification will affect how the leader relates to that person from that point on.
Members of the in-group are allowed to take part in decision-making processes and are given added responsibilities and access to closely held information. The leader typically invests more resources to support in-group members and gives them some latitude in their roles, establishing a connection in which the subordinate member serves as a trusted colleague. In return, the in-group member often expends more time and effort, seeks out more responsibility, and is more invested in the success of the team and organization than the out-group members. Overall, in-group members are more motivated and satisfied than their out-group counterparts.
Members of the out-group, on the other hand, are held accountable to formal employment specifications and are given much less leeway to perform beyond the parameters specifically outlined by their job contract. In these cases, the leader provides consideration and support only as mandated by duty and rarely goes beyond such limits to aid an out-group member. Essentially, the leader adheres to a contractual exchange with out-group personnel, viewing them merely as worker bees rather than substantially contributing members of the team. As a result, out-group members generally refrain from doing any more than is minimally required. With little recognition, reward, or confidence, they acquiesce to their supervisor’s authority rather than his or her leadership.
In-group members are often viewed as rising stars within the team, and the leader trusts them to work and perform at a high level. They are given the most support, advice, and opportunities. Members of the out-group receive few chances to shine and have little chance to change the leader’s initial opinion of them.
Bibliography
Ariani, Dorothea Wahyu. “Leader-Member Exchanges as a Mediator of the Effect of Job Satisfaction on Affective Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Test.” International Journal of Management29.1 (2012): 46+. Print.
Diebig, Mathias, et al. "Leader-Member Exchange Differentiation and Followers’ Psychological Strain: Exploring Relations on the Individual and on the Team-Level." Current Psychology, vol. 43, 9 May 2024, pp. 23115-23119, doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05960-3. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
Gertstner, C. R., and D. V. Day. “Meta-Analysis Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues.” Journal of Applied Psychology 82.6 (1997): 827–44. Print.
Heath, Robert L., and Jennings Bryant. “Communication in Organizations.” Human Communication Theory and Research: Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Taylor, 2000, 297–342. Print.
Ji, Huazhen, Xiaoyun Zhao and Junhua Dang. "Relationship Between Leadership-Member Exchange (LMX) and Flow at Work Among Medical Workers During the COVID-19: The Mediating Role of Job Crafting." BMC Psychology, vol. 11, no. 162, 18 May 2023, doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01194-3. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
Miner, John B. “Further to the Contingency Approach in Leadership Theory.” Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002, 320–56. Print.
Monahan, Kelly. “What Do Values Have to Do with It? An Exploration into the Moderating Impact of Work Values on the Relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange and Work Satisfaction.” Academy of Strategic Management Journal12.1 (2013): 95+. Print.
New Frontiers of Leadership: A Volume in LMX Leadership: The Series. Ed. George Graen. Charlotte: Information Age, 2004. Print.
Schermerhorn, John R. “Leader-Member Exchange Describes How Leaders Treat In-Group and Out-Group Followers.” Exploring Management. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2012, 268–69. Print.
Winkler, Ingo. “Leadership-Member Exchange Theory.” Contemporary Leadership Theories: Enhancing the Understanding of the Complexity, Subjectivity, and Dynamic of Leadership.Berlin: Springer, 2010, 47–54. Print.