Life chances
Life chances refer to the probabilities of opportunities available to individuals in society, influencing their potential for success and upward mobility. This concept emphasizes the importance of access to essential resources such as education, income, healthcare, and housing. Factors such as social class, gender, and race play significant roles in determining one’s life chances, with those from higher social classes generally enjoying more opportunities. Developed by sociologist Max Weber, the idea is closely tied to social stratification, which classifies individuals based on wealth, status, and power.
In stratified societies, individuals at the top have greater access to resources, leading to better health, higher-paying jobs, and overall improved living conditions. Conversely, members of lower social classes often experience a lack of resources, resulting in poorer health outcomes and limited economic opportunities. Gender also impacts life chances, with women historically facing disadvantages in the workplace and lower average earnings compared to men. Additionally, disparities based on race and ethnicity contribute to unequal life chances, as marginalized groups often contend with systemic barriers that hinder their access to job opportunities and economic advancement. Understanding life chances can provide insight into the broader social inequalities that affect diverse populations.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Life chances
In sociology, life chances are the probabilities of opportunities available to different groups in society. The term refers to the likelihood that people can achieve success and improve their station in life. Life chances include the extent to which people have access to valued resources in society, such as education, income, health, and housing. They account for the possibility that an individual's life will turn out in a specific way. For example, women statistically live longer than men. Members of the working class are more likely to die younger than members of the upper class.
An individual's life chances depend largely on financial standing. A person with more money will likely have access to more resources and opportunities and, thus, more life chances. An individual with a low social standing usually has fewer life chances. The uneven distribution of resources, or social inequality, affects life chances. Key factors that predict life chances are social class, gender, and race and ethnicity.
Background
German sociologist Max Weber developed the concept of life chances at the beginning of the twentieth century. Weber theorized that an individual's access to resources was determined by social structure, the socially devised differences between people. Life chances are linked to social stratification, which is the classification of people into social groups based on economic ranking. Three main components determine how people are grouped together: wealth, or amount of riches; social status, which includes the occupations or abilities that a society may value more than others; and power, when a person's desires supersede those of others.
When people have more wealth, social status, and power, they can organize society in a way that benefits them and leaves out others. Social stratification concerns the inequalities or advantages that people experience due to their place in society. The basis of social inequality lies in social structure. A society's structure limits access to resources depending upon a person's social standing. Inequalities result from varying access to resources, which in turn determines how much power a group of people has.
Social stratification can be viewed as a hierarchy. In a stratified society, people are ranked in levels depending on how much or how little they can share in resources. People at the top levels have the most access to resources, while those at the bottom have the least access. A person's place in society impacts his or her life chances. The higher a person ranks in a stratified society, the more opportunities he or she will likely encounter. Individuals of higher ranking have more chances to improve their position in life by having greater access to higher education, better-paying jobs, good health, and quality housing.
Overview
An individual's life chances are influenced by the following social components. The most important of these is social class, which is considered the foundation of social stratification.
Social class refers to how people are divided into categories according to their economic circumstances. Social class is typically presented as a pyramid, made up of three classes: the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class. The source of income, or compensation earned by performing a job, plays an important role in distinguishing class.
The upper class includes the richest people in society, such as property owners and executives. Their income primarily comes from investments and capital assets. The middle class includes managers and professionals. They derive their income from the work they do. The lower class is also called the working class and includes skilled workers, such as those who work in trades, and unskilled workers, who perform routine jobs or live on a fixed income. Unskilled workers' income may come from low-level jobs, seasonal work, or public assistance. Individuals in the upper class have the most money, while people in the lower class have the least and are subject to poverty.
The differences in social classes open disparities between the rich and poor, greatly impacting life chances. Because the upper class has greater access to resources, members of this class have more opportunities. They will have more life chances than individuals ranked lower on the class pyramid. For example, a person from the upper class is more likely to attend college than an individual in the lower class. By attaining a college degree, a person is more likely to find a higher-paying job, thereby increasing income. The individual can afford a higher standard of housing than a member of the lower class, who is less likely to own a home.
People at the bottom of the class pyramid are more likely to be in poor health. For example, members of the working class statistically have a higher chance of dying before retirement than members of the upper or middle class. Because they often work in low-paying jobs, members of the working class often have little access to medical care and preventive services.
An individual's gender can impact life chances. Gender stereotypes affect how men and women are perceived and treated. In the past, women were viewed as the more delicate sex and often worked in clerical jobs, while men were viewed as stronger and ran the workplace.
Although society is evolving in its recognition of gender roles, certain statistics still favor men over women. Women are paid less than men on every educational level, even in the same occupation. Women also are less likely than men to hold senior management positions. Inequality in the workplace affects women's life chances.
Statistically, women live longer than men do. According to statistics published by the Center for Disease Control in 2022, a woman's average life expectancy is 79.3 years, while men had an average life expectancy of 73.5 years, though science has yet to determine why.
Race is the physical or genetic traits used to identify a group of people, while ethnicity refers to the culture and customs of a geographic region. People of different races and ethnicities experience disparities in income. For example, in the United States, Black and Hispanic people earn less weekly median income and experience higher poverty rates than White people do. This is likely due to the types of jobs available and how those opportunities are distributed in the areas where they live. People may face job discrimination due to race and ethnicity. Because of these factors, the life chances for Black and Hispanic people are more limited than those for White people.
The social science of life chances applies to groups of people. Although probabilities are used to predict opportunities and outcomes, they are neither specific nor definite for any single individual. People can move among the social classes, which can lead to opportunities to improve the quality of their lives.
Bibliography
Baum, Fran, et al. "New Perspective on Why Women Live Longer Than Men: An Exploration of Power, Gender, Social Determinants, and Capitals." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 2, 2021, p. 661. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020661. Accessed 22 Dec. 2024.
Eder, Klaus. The New Politics of Class: Social Movements and Cultural Dynamics in Advanced Societies. Sage Publications, 1993.
“Life Expectancy.” CDC, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/life-expectancy.htm. Accessed 21 December 2024.
George, Erin, and Gretchen Livingston. “What You Need to Know about the Gender Wage Gap.” U.S. Department of Labor Blog, 12 Mar. 2024, blog.dol.gov/2024/03/12/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-gender-wage-gap. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
Goldberg, Roberta. Understanding Contemporary Social Problems through Media. Routledge, 2016.
Henslin, James M. Down to Earth Sociology: Introductory Readings. 14th ed., Free Press, 2007.
McCoy, Brenda, and Nicole Dash. "Class." Social Vulnerability to Disasters, 2nd ed., edited by Deborah S.K. Thomas, et al., CRC Press, 2013.
Moore, Stephen. Sociology Alive! 3rd ed., Nelson Thornes, 2001.
Lawson, Tony, and Joan Garrod. Dictionary of Sociology. Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001, p. 139.
Robson, David. "Why Do Women Live Longer than Men?" BBC, 2 Oct. 2015, www.bbc.com/future/story/20151001-why-women-live-longer-than-men. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
Walsh, Mark, et al. Social Policy and Welfare. Stanley Thornes, 2000.
Webb, Jonathan. "Women Are Still Paid Less than Men — Even in the Same Job." Forbes, 31 Mar. 2016, www.forbes.com/sites/jwebb/2016/03/31/women-are-still-paid-less-than-men-even-in-the-same-job/#24f6c3147099. Accessed 21 Dec. 2024.
Wright, Erin Olin. "The Shadow of Exploitation in Weber's Class Analysis." Max Weber's Economy and Society: A Critical Companion, edited by Charles Camic, Stanford UP, 2005.