NACHO Formally Becomes the First Gay Political Coalition
NACHO, or the North American Conference of Homophile Organizations, formally emerged as the first gay political coalition during its fourth meeting held in Chicago from August 11 to 18, 1968. This pivotal conference marked a significant evolution from earlier gatherings focused primarily on communication to a more structured and united body with a formalized framework aimed at establishing a legitimate national homophile movement. Participants engaged in discussions addressing various issues such as security clearances for homosexuals and the need for a "homosexual bill of rights," advocating for equal treatment under the law and accountability from political candidates regarding LGBTQ+ rights.
The conference embraced the slogan "Gay Is Good," reflecting a shift towards a more affirmative and demanding stance in the face of societal stigma. Despite its achievements in fostering communication and collaboration within the gay rights movement, NACHO faced challenges, particularly in its representation of diverse voices, including those of women and people of color. The emergence of radical youth movements and events like the Stonewall Rebellion in 1969 ultimately shifted the landscape of LGBTQ+ activism, suggesting that NACHO's groundwork played a role in the broader struggle for gay rights.
On this Page
NACHO Formally Becomes the First Gay Political Coalition
The North American Conference of Homophile Organizations, or NACHO, was formally created as a formal body with a mission to unify the homophile movement at a national level in terms of philosophy, ideals, and action. The founding of this first gay political coalition set the stage for the militant era of the lesbian and gay rights movement that soon followed.
Date August 11-18, 1968
Locale Chicago, Illinois
Key Figures
Robert Warren Cromey vicar of St. Aidan’s Episcopal Church in San Francisco, CaliforniaStephen Donaldson (Robert Martin; 1946-1996), founder of the first Student Homophile League at Columbia University, New YorkFranklin Kameny (b. 1925), executive director of the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C.
Summary of Event
Between August 11 and 18, just one week prior to the Democratic National Convention in 1968, the fourth meeting of the North American Conference of Homophile Organizations (NACHO), known earlier as the National Planning Conference of Homosexual Organizations, convened in Chicago. The meetings were held in a closed bar that temporarily had its liquor license revoked. Previous meetings had established various committees to deal with such issues as security clearances for homosexuals, government employment, military service, developing new organizations, reaching out to youth, circulating publications, religion, accreditation, and forming a national organization.
![Frank Kameny attending Pride on June 12, 2010 By Davd from Washington, DC (Frank Kameny Uploaded by varnent) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons 96775933-90076.jpg](https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/img/embimages/ers/sp/embedded/96775933-90076.jpg?ephost1=dGJyMNHX8kSepq84xNvgOLCmsE2epq5Srqa4SK6WxWXS)
By the time of the Chicago meeting, NACHO had made a significant shift, from simply being a convention for communications (as it was in Kansas City in 1966) to becoming a “loose federation” with articles of confederation (San Francisco, 1966) to proclaiming itself as “a duly constituted continuing body with the ultimate goal of establishing a legitimate homophile movement on a national scale” (Washington, D.C., 1967). The Chicago conference was a turning point for NACHO. It had legitimately matured into what a few visionary leaders had first intended: a formal, united body. It was thought that national unity would expand and strengthen the homophile movement by projecting an image of gays that would necessarily demand respect and a serious hearing. Regardless of many groups’ disparate views on the direction the movement should take and wide disapproval of the credentials committee’s subjective stance toward applicants (in fact, a few groups were threatening withdrawal over the committee’s actions), the affiliates met in Chicago and established a formal structure for NACHO.
The conference chairman, the Reverend Robert Cromey, moderated the event. The Committee on Unity, chaired by Stephen Donaldson, was perhaps the most active body that week. On August 13, 1968, the committee submitted a draft of “standing rules” that proposed the operation of an administrative body with an executive committee and council. The document stated that the convention was still the supreme organ and would overrule any decisions made by any faction of the NACHO constituency. It was further decided that the conference would subdivide into regions—East, West, and Midwest—to allow frequent communications and intergroup activities that would not contradict the policies of the national office.
The important studies of Evelyn Hooker, psychologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, had recently been published; she had provided valid evidence that homosexuals are not inherently sick individuals. Much of the conference lent itself to discussion surrounding this issue. At the time, the general retort from homophile groups to the ominous condemnation that “gay is bad” was that “gay is not bad.” Franklin Kameny took this retort a step further with a slogan he crafted prior to the conference, the radically positive affirmation that “Gay Is Good.” Two years earlier, NACHO had been able to agree only on a watered-down, self-oppressed statement that “each homosexual should be judged as an individual.” Now they adopted Kameny’s slogan to be used on the national front.
The conference also focused on issuing a “homosexual bill of rights” from the now-national homophile coalition. The proclamation can be summarized by saying that homosexuals were no longer pleading for but instead demanding that they receive equal treatment and protection under the law in matters of employment, federal security clearances, citizenship, and service in the military. They demanded a cessation of entrapment and sodomy laws as they pertained to consensual adults in private. They agreed, furthermore, that all political candidates should be held accountable to their homosexual constituencies and declare their views on issues concerning gay and lesbian rights.
Significance
It is ironic that what ultimately led to the demise of NACHO was a failure to embrace a characteristic inherent in the homophile community at large. The homophile community is rich with diversity; it is not and never will be composed of a single race or ethnicity, gender, or creed of persons. Charged predominantly by white men, NACHO failed to incorporate lesbian issues in the forefront of its cause, failed to reach out to other groups fighting the battle for civil rights, and refused to abandon its conservatism in a climate that called for radical reform.
In 1968, the Eastern Regional Conference of Homophile Organizations was officially overrun by radical youth, an event that proved to be only the beginning of a trend that gained strength through the 1969 Stonewall Rebellion and its aftermath, including the birth of the Gay Liberation Front. Stephen Donaldson was at the forefront of the radical youth movement and in many ways led the Gay Liberation Front’s infiltration into NACHO.
NACHO’s accomplishments may have fallen short of expectations, but they nonetheless were real. Promoting a breakthrough in communication and collaboration, the movement proclaimed an idea that was radical for its time—“Gay Is Good”—and loosened the grip of self-oppression on many gays, effectively opening the issue of homosexuality and encouraging large numbers of gays to join the movement. It will always remain to be proven whether Stonewall would have happened in 1969 if not for NACHO and the radical increase in the visibility and interconnectivity of homosexuals that it created.
Bibliography
Blasius, Mark, and Shane Phelan. We Are Everywhere. New York: Routledge, 1997.
D’Emilio, John. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940-1970. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Duberman, Martin B. Stonewall. New York: Dutton, 1993.
Johnson, David. “Frank Kameny.” In Leaders from the 1960’s: A Biographical Sourcebook of American Activism, edited by David DeLeon. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1994.
Marcus, Eric. Making Gay History: The Half Century Fight for Lesbian and Gay Equal Rights. New York: HarperCollins, 2002.
Marotta, Toby. The Politics of Homosexuality. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.