Snowball sampling
Snowball sampling is a research recruitment method that relies on existing participants to refer new subjects, allowing researchers to build a larger sample over time. This technique is particularly useful in studying specific, often hard-to-reach populations, such as marginalized groups or individuals with unique experiences, where traditional sampling methods may fall short. The name "snowball sampling" reflects the way the method expands: like a snowball gathering more snow as it rolls downhill. This approach can foster trust among participants, as referrals come from acquaintances, which may encourage greater willingness to participate.
While snowball sampling can lead to quicker and more cost-effective data collection, it also has inherent risks. The reliance on participants' referrals can introduce bias, as people often associate with others who share similar views and experiences, potentially skewing the study results. Additionally, ethical concerns may arise, particularly when sensitive topics are involved. Despite these challenges, snowball sampling remains a valuable tool for researchers aiming to understand unique communities or behaviors that may otherwise be overlooked.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Snowball sampling
Snowball sampling is a method for recruiting subjects for research studies in which people who have already participated are asked to recommend others to take part. Also known as chain sampling or referral sampling, this method is especially helpful to sociologists who are seeking information about specific groups of people who may not be easy to identify. While it can be very useful in certain instances, snowball sampling can create bias and make it difficult to determine how the study results apply to larger populations.
Overview
Snowball sampling gets its name because it gathers more subjects and additional layers of information as it progresses, much like a snowball gathers snow and other matter as it rolls down a hill. It is unclear exactly when the term snowball sampling came into use, but it is known that it was in use in the 1950s. However, it initially referred to studies that were focused on relationships, and the sampling relied on interviewing people with some connections to one another to inform the study results.
In the twenty-first century, snowball sampling is used in situations when it is difficult to identify people who have the quality or qualities the scientists seek to study. For instance, researchers who want to interview couples who disagree about whether to have children may have a hard time finding enough subjects that meet those criteria. The technique is also used when it might otherwise be difficult to get potential subjects to participate because of fear, distrust, or embarrassment.
To use snowball sampling, researchers first identify a few subjects who meet their criteria and conduct their survey. This can often be the most difficult part of the process, especially if the study aims to gather information about a behavior that is illegal or that could be embarrassing or uncomfortable for the subject to discuss. During the survey, the researchers take steps to earn the trust of the participants. They then ask these subjects to recommend other people who may meet the same criteria. The potential subjects are contacted and interviewed and are also asked to refer other subjects for study. The process continues until the researchers have gathered all the information they need, or they cannot find more potential subjects.
The technique can be advantageous. First, it gives researchers an additional way to find potential subjects. Second, the researchers can more readily gain the trust and cooperation of those identified by friends or acquaintances because of the connection and rapport they have built with the initial subjects who recommended them. This allows the studies to be conducted more quickly and cost-effectively.
The technique does have disadvantages, however. It is possible that people will be unwilling to involve their friends in such a study. When the study involves certain issues, such as health concerns, the method can also raise questions about the ethics of asking people to share such information. Since people tend to associate with people who share their experiences and viewpoints, the results of the survey can be slanted or biased in a particular direction. With this method, it is also difficult to tell how well the subjects represent a broader population. However, the technique remains valuable, especially to sociologists or others who seek to study something about a marginalized population, such as homeless individuals or undocumented immigrants.
Bibliography
Atkinson, Rowland, and John Flint. "Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies." Sociology at Surrey, Summer 2001, sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU33.html. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
Crossman, Ashley. "What Is a Snowball Sample in Sociology?" ThoughtCo., 6 May 2019, www.thoughtco.com/snowball-sampling-3026730. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
Dudovskiy, John. "Snowball Sampling." BusinessResearch Methodology, research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/snowball-sampling. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
Handcock, Mark S., and Krista J. Gile. "On the Concept of Snowball Sampling." Cornell University Library, 2 Aug. 2011, arxiv.org/pdf/1108.0301.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
Heckathorn, Douglas D. "Snowball Versus Respondent-Driven Sampling." Sociological Methodology, vol. 41, no. 1, 1 Aug. 2011, pp. 355–66.
Parker, Charlie, et al. "Snowball Sampling." SAGE Research Methods Foundations, edited by Paul Atkinson et al., 2019. SAGE Research Methods, doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
"Snowball Sampling." Business Jargons, businessjargons.com/snowball-sampling.html. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.
"Snowball Sampling." Oregon State University Division of Research and Innovation, 14 Sept. 2010, research.oregonstate.edu/irb/policies-and-guidance-investigators/guidance/snowball-sampling. Accessed 20 Jan. 2025.