Thematic analysis
Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method that focuses on identifying patterns, or themes, within data sets. Its flexibility allows researchers to apply various theoretical frameworks, making it accessible for individuals at different levels of experience. The analysis is structured into defined steps that guide researchers in examining data, coding it for themes, and ultimately reporting their findings with clarity. The process begins with a thorough familiarization with the data, followed by coding that highlights similar themes. Researchers then group these codes into broader themes, ensuring that each theme accurately reflects the data. This is followed by refining the themes and establishing relationships among them, often visualized with a thematic map. The final stage involves creating a formal report that documents the themes and their significance. While thematic analysis is praised for its adaptability and ease of use, it also presents challenges, particularly regarding the potential for subjectivity and bias, as researchers' interpretations can influence the outcomes.
On this Page
Thematic analysis
Thematic analysis is a method used in qualitative research to identify patterns, or themes, within a given data set. The analysis is independent of any specific theoretical framework, so it provides researchers the flexibility to apply any paradigm to their analysis. That freedom from theoretical stricture makes thematic analysis one of the simpler and more accessible methodologies of qualitative research, open to researchers at any level of experience. A set of defined steps within the methodology provides a consistent approach that guides researchers through the use of thematic analysis to assess data, determine themes, and report findings with clarity and validity.
Overview
In thematic analysis, the first step for researchers is to delve deeply into the data by repeated reading, viewing, or listening. It is imperative that researchers are thoroughly familiar with the data before they can make any assessments of potential patterns or themes within it. Notes may be taken, but no conclusions are made at this stage in the analysis.
The second step in thematic analysis involves coding or grouping the data by highlighting like themes in like ways. Each theme should represent something important about the data that supports or contradicts the research theory.
Once the coding has been completed for all the data, the researcher moves to stage three in the process: discerning potential themes. During this stage, all data points that have been identified with the same code are grouped together under broad themes.
Once the general themes have been established, the researcher reviews and refines the themes through further analysis. This involves reexamining the data points under each theme to confirm they fit logically into the pattern serving as the basis of the theme. If not, the researcher must reassess the theme and potentially recode the data. Once all the data fits logically into the defined themes, the researcher can start to consider relationships between the various documented themes. Usually, a thematic map is created at this point to visually reflect the connections between the data themes.
For the next step in the analysis, the researcher assigns meaning and defines the themes. This is where the narrative of the data emerges, within each theme individually and across all data as a whole. Connections should be clear and rational.
The final step in thematic analysis is to create the formal report that documents the themes, including examples from the data, and clearly demonstrates what the themes signify relative to the data.
Like any research methodology, thematic analysis has both benefits and shortcomings in application. On the plus side, thematic analysis is a flexible approach that is simple to learn and execute and accommodates variability in insight and interpretation. On the downside, there are so few parameters regarding thematic analysis that the research can become extremely subjective. The data selections, coding, and themes are defined by the researcher, who is trying to prove or disprove a specific theory. That situation could lead to unintentional bias.
Bibliography
Braun, Virginia, et al. "How to Use Thematic Analysis with Interview Data." The Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Handbook. Sage, 2014, pp. 183–97.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage, 2013.
Boyatzis, Richard E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage, 1998.
Gibson, William, and Andrew Brown. Working with Qualitative Data. Sage, 2009, pp. 127–44.
Guest, Greg, et al. Applied Thematic Analysis. Sage, 2012.
King, Nigel, and Christine Horrocks. Interviews in Qualitative Research. Sage, 2010, pp. 142–74.
Naeem, Muhammad, et al. "A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research." International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8 Nov. 2023, doi:10.1177/16094069231205789. Accessed 26 July 2024.
Ritchie, Lewis J., et al., editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researcher. Sage, 2013.
Vaismoradi, M., et al. "Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study." Nursing & Health Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, 2013, pp. 398–405.