Participation Trophies: Overview
Participation trophies are awards given to all participants in an activity, particularly in youth sports, regardless of their competitive success. They gained prominence in the United States in the 1990s and became a hotly debated topic in the early twenty-first century. The discussion surrounding participation trophies often revolves around differing perspectives on their impact on children's development. Critics argue that these awards may promote mediocrity, diminish the drive for improvement, and foster an entitled mindset among children. Conversely, supporters claim that participation trophies validate effort and commitment, encourage enjoyment of sports, and emphasize values such as good sportsmanship and fitness over competition. The debate has been intensified by public statements from professional athletes opposing participation trophies, alongside mixed research findings from psychologists regarding their effects on self-esteem and entitlement. While the controversy surrounding participation trophies has lessened in recent years, discussions about their appropriateness and implications for various age groups remain relevant. Overall, the topic reflects broader themes in child development and the philosophy of youth sports.
Participation Trophies: Overview
Introduction
Participation trophies are awards granted to everyone who participates in an activity, rather than solely those who win a competition. They are most commonly used in youth athletics programs, particularly those geared toward children of elementary school age or younger. In the early twenty-first century, participation trophies became a frequent point of contention among many parents, individuals in charge of various children's activities, and psychologists. The debate centers around whether rewarding those who do not win is beneficial or harmful to children's social, emotional, and psychological development.
Those opposed to the awarding of participation trophies often argue that the practice of handing out such trophies rewards mediocrity, giving each participant recognition that should be reserved only for those competitors who truly perform at the highest level. They claim that the experience of losing athletic competitions at an early age plays a key role in a child's development, and that awarding participation trophies reduces the incentive for self-improvement. Some opponents have further suggested that children who receive such trophies are at risk of developing an entitled mindset. Proponents of participation trophies, on the other hand, argue that such awards recognize the commitment and effort that participants have demonstrated and assert that there is value in trying one's best, even if one does not succeed. They claim that rather than encouraging children to become complacent or entitled, participation trophies in fact encourage interest in sports, especially in young children, and shift the focus of youth athletic programs to fun, physical fitness, and good sportsmanship rather than intense competition.
Understanding the Discussion
Baby boomer generation: The generation of Americans born between approximately 1946 and 1964.
Entitlement: The belief that one deserves to have some privilege, such as recognition or an award.
Generation X: The generation of Americans born between 1965 and the early 1980s.
Millennial generation: The generation of Americans born between the early 1980s and the late 1990s.
Participation trophy: A trophy one earns for participating in a competition rather than for winning.
History
Although participation trophies have been a subject of debate in the United States since at least the first decade of the twenty-first century, the origins of the practice of awarding them are unclear. They first rose to prominence in the United States in the 1990s, and so have become widely associated in the news media and popular culture with the millennial generation, who were children during the 1990s. However, there is historical evidence of participation trophies existing significantly earlier, undermining the perception that they are a uniquely millennial development. For instance, a pamphlet commemorating the Appalachian Sports Car Club's twenty-fifth anniversary mentioned that a club member received a participation trophy in 1975; a 1977 article in the Suffolk County News noted that participation awards were presented to members of the Sayville, New York, softball program; and the 1982 yearbook of the North Dakota High School Activities Association referenced participation trophies given out at state cheerleading tournaments. The recipients of those awards likely belonged to the baby boomer generation or generation X. As these relatively early examples indicate, participation trophies and similar awards have long been most common in athletic competitions, particularly youth sports tournaments.
It is similarly unclear when participation trophies began to generate significant controversy. However, the debate certainly intensified in the early twenty-first century in conjunction with the entry of numerous millennials into adulthood and the entry of the subsequent generation of children into youth sports. The early twenty-first-century debate about participation trophies took on a number of forms, with the bulk of the conflict coming down to a difference in philosophy regarding the purpose and primary focus of youth sports. Individuals opposed to participation trophies tended to emphasize the competitive nature of children's athletic programs and focus on the importance of winning, regardless of the age of the athletes involved. Proponents of participation trophies, on the other hand, tended to focus more on the social and health benefits of youth sports, emphasizing the need for children to exercise, have fun, and learn the ideals of good sportsmanship.
These two competing philosophies are evident in a number of the arguments in favor of or in opposition to participation trophies. Opponents have often asserted that receiving participation trophies can have a detrimental effect on a child's competitiveness and drive to improve as an athlete. Proponents have argued that awarding participation trophies encourages children to become interested in sports and teaches positive values.
By the 2010s participation trophies had become increasingly common in American society, especially in youth sports. This growth also brought even more prominent debate over the issue, with high-profile coverage in many media outlets. Parents and athletic leaders such as coaches often voiced strong opinions on both sides the matter, while experts such as psychologists and educators also weighed in from various perspectives. Some youth athletes themselves also spoke up either for or against participation trophies.
The debate gained further steam in 2015 and 2016, when media outlets widely reported on a number of professional athletes who had made public statements in opposition to participation trophies. In late 2015, for example, professional football player James Harrison, a linebacker with the Pittsburgh Steelers, made a public statement online after learning that his sons—six and eight years old at the time—had received trophies for participating in youth football. He explained that he did not think that they should receive trophies merely for participating, and insisted that his children return any trophies they received until they were earned competitively. Some other professional athletes later followed suit, including Harrison's fellow Steelers player DeAngelo Williams, who in 2016 returned a participation ribbon his daughter received during a field day event on similar grounds. Williams argued that losing that ribbon encouraged his daughter to perform better, thus enabling her to win ribbons in later events. Such widely publicized instances attracted significant attention to the ongoing debate.
Participation Trophies Today
The surge of controversy around participation trophies faded somewhat in the late 2010s and into the 2020s. Some observers contended that the issue had been blown out of proportion, perhaps even as a facet of the conservative-liberal culture wars, and did not warrant significant attention. Nevertheless, the debate still remained active. It often merged with discussions of the concept of youth entitlement, which became a prominent talking point not limited to sports. Specific events also brought fresh spikes of public interest. For example, in 2023, a bill was introduced in the North Carolina Senate seeking to prohibit participation trophies in youth sports run by local government authorities, generating a wave of national media coverage.
For psychologists specializing in fields such as child development, the debate surrounding participation trophies and other forms of recognition or praise that some Americans deem excessive has provided fruitful opportunities for research. However, scientific findings have been mixed, with some researchers linking participation trophies with entitled and narcissistic attitudes in children and others finding a correlation between positive reinforcement through trophies and improved self-esteem and interest in sports. In some cases, both sides of the debate have adopted the same research as supporting evidence for their positions. A study by Stanford University professor Carol Dweck on the effects of praise on children, for instance, has been cited as evidence by both opponents and proponents of participation trophies.
While both sides of the participation trophy debate have defined core beliefs about the subject, there has also continued to be a nuanced array of opinions. For example, some observers have supported participation trophies for very young children just becoming interested in sports, but expressed skepticism of their appropriateness for older children and teens. Others have leaned toward one side or the other but ultimately considered the debate itself to be overblown when compared to the issue's actual significance.
These essays and any opinions, information, or representations contained therein are the creation of the particular author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of EBSCO Information Services.
Bibliography
Blanchet, Ben. "North Carolina Republicans Look to Ax Participation Trophies with New Bill." HuffPost, 2 Apr. 2023, www.huffpost.com/entry/north-carolina-bill-participation-trophies‗n‗64291fd8e4b01284198dc5d6. Accessed 24 Oct. 2023.
Brown, George. "DeAngelo Williams Is No Fan of Participation Trophies and Ribbons." News Channel 3. WREG, 13 May 2016. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
Fink, Candida. "The Power of Participation Trophies." Psychology Today, 27 Feb. 2023, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/changing-minds/202302/the-power-of-participation-trophies. Accessed 1 Nov. 2024.
Roos, Jordan, and Brad Strand. "The Conundrum of Participation Trophies in Youth Sports." PHE America, 18 Oct. 2021, www.pheamerica.org/2021/the-conundrum-of-participation-trophies-in-youth-sports/. Accessed 1 Nov. 2024.
Ross, Martha. "Should Kids in Sports Get Trophies for Just Participating?" Mercury News, 25 Sept. 2015. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.
Wallace, Kelly. "Does Sports Participation Deserve a Trophy? Let the Parental Debate Begin." CNN Health, 18 Aug. 2015, www.cnn.com/2015/08/17/health/participation-trophies-parenting-debate/index.html. Accessed 12 Sept. 2016.