Brain drain

DEFINITION: Exodus of highly educated and skilled workers from developing countries to more advanced industrial countries

SIGNIFICANCE: Brain drain often pulls the best and the brightest from their homelands as workers seek more lucrative job opportunities abroad, where they believe their marketability will be rewarded. Brain drain usually occurs in developing countries with religious persecution, political instability, economic turmoil, or civil conflict. The emigrating workers are skilled specialists (researchers, technicians, medical professionals, engineers, and educators) who perform crucial services that contribute to global competitiveness in medical or scientific research, entrepreneurship, and technological advances for the host country.

The London Royal Society coined the term "brain drain" to describe the mass emigration of preeminent scientists from East Germany and the Soviet Union to the US and Canada after World War II. The advantages of brain drain include knowledge flow, global cooperation, and international mobility, which allows professionals to exchange management experience. However, critics have contended that such an exodus of talented persons has negative consequences for the emigrants’ home countries, which are argued to have been left behind in an economic sense. Migrants from developing countries are likely to stay in advanced countries since specific fields require expensive equipment and labs, which the host countries have, and because such amenities are not always available or accessible in developing countries.

Some research has shown that the negative economic consequences of brain drain can be substantial. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, one study found that an estimated 20 percent of skilled South Africans had left their homeland, and that brain drain cost the country about $250 million annually. India produced 178,000 software engineers yearly, and four of the ten programmers worked in the US. In 1998, the Indian Institute of Technology sent 30 percent of its graduates to the US. In 2001, the United Nations estimated that India was losing $2 billion per year because of brain drain, a devastating loss for a country in which 40 percent of the adult population at that time was illiterate.

However, other studies emerged that challenged this view. In particular, critics of the classic brain drain model argue that it does not consider the continuing connection many professionals have to their home countries, whether they eventually return to live there. These workers often end up benefiting their native countries in various ways. The most notable—and measurable—benefit is the sending of remittances back to their families in the homeland; such money transfers form a significant part of the economies of many developing nations. The World Bank estimated that in 2010, the annual value of remittances globally reached US$325 billion, and many workers received higher wages abroad than they could have if they stayed in their native countries, allowing them to send more to their families. This trend continued in India into the mid-2020s, especially in the information technology field. Many graduates of top Indian education institutions immigrated to the US to pursue professions, and others chose to attend secondary education institutions in the US. This migration of skilled and educated workers continued to cause a financial strain on the Indian economy.

Additionally, critics of the traditional concept of brain drain suggest that the value of education immigrants receive further helps balance any economic loss to their native countries. By learning skills they could not obtain at home, immigrants increase their human capital, allowing them to earn more and send more remittances home or take higher-paying and higher-status positions if they do return home, as many do. Some research suggests that in developing countries in which leaving to work abroad is seen as an achievable goal, young people are more likely to pursue domestic education options that will make them more attractive to foreign employers. This benefits the home country by supporting educational systems and reducing unemployment. Finally, some researchers suggest that by having a force of skilled workers and professionals participating in the international community and job market, developing countries gain an improved image that, over time, can bring social and economic advantages.

United States

The US attracts more foreign-born professionals than any other country. American colleges and universities have traditionally recruited international students in the hope that they may return to make significant contributions to their home countries. However, higher education has also been essential for American companies in recruiting such workers. Fewer than one-half of foreign doctoral and postdoctoral students who study in the US return to their home countries after graduation. Surveys showed that 88 percent of doctoral graduates in science and technology from 1990 to 1991 still resided in the US five years later, leaving home countries with shortages in medicine and engineering. From the early 1990s to the early 2010s, approximately 900,000 skilled workers emigrated from India, China, and Russia under the temporary visa program, and only a few countries have successfully lured their talented, well-educated young people back home. In the 2020s, these trends have only continued. Between 2010 and 2022, the immigrant population from India in the US increased by more than one million and from China by 647,000. The demand for skilled workers in Western nations has only hastened the migration of skilled workers to these nations, especially in the field of technology. 

Reverse Brain Drain

While most scholars view the concept of brain drain as either beneficial to both home and host countries or simply detrimental to home countries, some evidence suggests there may be negative implications for host countries in certain cases—specifically, when skilled immigrants receive high-value education abroad but do not remain in the host country to put their talents to use. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the US began losing scientists and engineers to Asia, creating a "reverse brain drain," in which individuals legally enter the country to work or study but, due to a limited visa quota and numerous delays in processing, return to their home countries to work for global competitors of the US. Amid the global recession in 2008, these professionals often returned to countries such as India and China, whose economies were comparatively booming, applying their knowledge and experience gained while living in the US. These countries have learned that improving working conditions and career advancement opportunities is the best method for attracting and maintaining professionals.

Reverse brain drain could have serious implications for the US. In 2006, 25.6 percent of all patent applications in the US listed foreign nationals as inventors or coinventors, an increase of 18 percent from 1998. The potential loss of such innovation in the fields of medicine and engineering could be devastating unless the immigration policy for skilled workers is improved. On an annual basis, more than one million skilled immigrants compete for only about 120,000 visas allotted by the US, fueling the so-called brain drain reversal. In 2023, the US government issued 266,000 H-1B visas, a popular route for skilled workers looking to enter the US. However, some researchers argue that, as with the original concept of brain drain, the effects of globalism mean that allowing professionals to gain education and apply their skills wherever they choose ultimately benefits all parties. Although skilled workers continue to immigrate to the US for career opportunities, economic downturns in the early 2020s, including layoffs in tech-related fields, have also fueled the reverse brain drain. The rise of telecommuting and the decrease in the amount of time workers spent in traditional office settings also affected the reverse brain drain, allowing workers to return to their countries of origin and still maintain employment.

Bibliography

Batalova, Jeanne. "Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigration." Migration Policy Institute, 13 Mar. 2024, www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states-2024. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

Beine, Michel, Frédéric Docquier, and Hillel Rapoport. "Brain Drain and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence." Journal of Development Economics, vol. 64, Feb. 2001, pp. 275–289.

"Brain Drain." Investopedia, 2016, www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brain‗drain.asp. Accessed 7 Oct. 2016.

Cervantes, Mario, and Dominique Guellec. "The Brain Drain: Old Myths, New Realities." OECD Observer, vol. 230, Jan. 2002, pp. 40–41.

"Drain or Gain?" Economist, 26 May 2011, www.economist.com/node/18741763. Accessed 7 Oct. 2016.

"India: Human Flight and Brain Drain Index 2023." Statista, 8 July 2024, www.statista.com/statistics/1477429/india-human-flight-and-brain-drain-index. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

Miyagiwa, Kaz. "Scale Economies in Education and the Brain Drain Problem." International Economic Review, vol. 32, Aug. 1991, pp. 743–759.

Raviv, Shaun. "Why 'Brain Drain' Can Actually Benefit African Countries." Atlantic, 11 Feb. 2014. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/02/why-brain-drain-can-actually-benefit-african-countries/283750/. Accessed 7 Oct. 2016.

"Should We Plug the Brain Drain? The Pros and Cons of Scientist Mobility." CORDIS - EU Research Results, 18 July 2006, cordis.europa.eu/article/id/26025-should-we-plug-the-brain-drain-the-pros-and-cons-of-scientist-mobility. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

Singhal, Yash. "How India's Brain Drain and Foreign Students Dip Led to $6 Billion Deficit." Business Standard, 21 July 2024, www.business-standard.com/economy/news/how-india-s-brain-drain-and-foreign-students-dip-led-to-6-billion-deficit-124071600859‗1.html. Accessed 3 Sept. 2024.

Solimano, Andrés. Globalizing Talent and Human Capital: Implications for Developing Countries. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL, 2002.

Webber, Alan M. "Reverse Brain Drain Threatens U.S. Economy." USA Today, 23 Feb. 2004, p. 13A.