Konstantin Mikhailovich Fofanov
Konstantin Mikhailovich Fofanov (1862–1911) was a Russian poet born in St. Petersburg to a middle-class family. His early education was limited to the fourth grade due to his father's financial difficulties, but Fofanov compensated for this lack by becoming an avid reader, particularly of the works of renowned poets like Aleksandr Pushkin. He began writing poetry influenced by Pushkin and other contemporaries, often focusing on themes of nature, religion, and emotion. His lyrical style and keen ear for melodious verse led to many of his poems being set to music, although he faced criticism for some of his more controversial works.
Fofanov published several collections, including "Stikhotvoreniia" (1887) and "Teni i tainy" (1892), and was recognized for both his emotional expressiveness and his social commentary on the struggles of the Russian populace. Despite his literary success and influence on the Symbolist movement, Fofanov's life was marred by mental health issues and alcoholism, which ultimately hindered his writing and led to his decline. He passed away in St. Petersburg from malnutrition and pneumonia, leaving behind a legacy as a poet who navigated the complexities of his environment and personal challenges through his work.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Konstantin Mikhailovich Fofanov
Poet
- Born: May 18, 1862
- Birthplace: St. Petersburg, Russia
- Died: May 17, 1911
- Place of death: St. Petersburg, Russia
Biography
Konstantin Mikhailovich Fofanov was born in St. Petersburg, Russia, into a large family of a middle-class shopkeeper. His father showed a strong interest in old-time religion and went bankrupt, so Fofanov was able to finish only a fourth-grade education. He made up for this incomplete education by reading steadily and voraciously. He was especially interested in the biographies of poets, above all in Aleksandr Pushkin, who exerted a strong influence on Fofanov all of his life.
Fofanov started writing poetry early, inspired by Pushkin, Nikolai Nekrasov, and Semen Nadson. His poems at this time were mostly about nature and on religious and biblical themes, although some of them were rejected by religious authorities as wrong and lascivious. He possessed a good ear for melodious verse; many of his poems were set to music as popular romances. Unfortunately, his lack of higher education prevented him from writing more sophisticated poetry, so his poems were devoid of refined craftsmanship. He also wrote ballads and narrative poems, which he called “a novel in verse” or “a tale in verse.” Even in his poems on social themes, however, he was interested primarily in aesthetic qualities.
Fofanov engaged in various literary activities. By 1885, he was able to support himself financially and leave his father’s home. He continued to write lyrical poems about nature in a highly emotional manner. The staple features of his poetic universe were landscapes, springtime, stars, flowers, birds, and young love in such environments. In 1887, he published his first book of poetry, Stikhotvoreniia, followed by two other collections, Teni i tainy (1892), and Illiuzii (1900). By then, his poetry was widely accepted as that of a person deeply disappointed in life, yet not having completely lost faith. His poems remained basically lyrical, showing improvement in formal matters, but he also returned increasingly to social themes, such as the hunger of the Russian populace and author Leo Tolstoy’s excommunication. He was widely accepted by critics and readers. He even exerted some influence on the young Symbolists, but as these poets’ work developed differently from that of Fofanov, his influence waned.
The first symptoms of Fofanov’s mental illness appeared in 1890. He had married, and his financial problems had diminished, but his heavy drinking and deterioration of his nervous system forced his family to send him to a mental institution. As the illness progressed, he found it increasingly difficult to cope with it and carry on with his literary activities, although he continued to write poetry, but sparingly. His friends moved him back to St. Petersburg, where he died from malnutrition and pneumonia one day before his forty-ninth birthday. His legacy is that of a poet who did reasonably well within the limitations of his talent and the trying circumstances of his life.