Objectivity (science)
Scientific objectivity is a fundamental principle guiding the scientific community in conducting research with neutrality and accuracy. It emphasizes the importance of observing and documenting scientific truths while minimizing personal biases. The scientific method is central to achieving this objectivity, consisting of structured steps: making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing evidence-based conclusions. This methodology is designed to ensure that results can be replicated by independent researchers, further validating the findings.
The concept of scientific objectivity gained prominence in the early nineteenth century alongside advancements in research technology. This era marked a shift from subjective interpretations of observations, often depicted through artistic representations, to more accurate recordings facilitated by innovations like photographic technology. To maintain objectivity, scientists employ strategies such as using standardized measurements and tools, ensuring blinding in experiments, and conducting peer reviews of research findings. Despite ongoing debates about the possibility of true objectivity, the commitment to unbiased research practices remains a cornerstone of scientific inquiry, reinforcing the integrity and reliability of scientific knowledge across disciplines.
On this Page
Objectivity (science)
Scientific objectivity is the basis on which the scientific community strives to conduct its research. Objectivity is the concept that scientists observe and document scientific truths, theories, and facts through study and experimentation while remaining neutral on the subject themselves. The scientific method, the process by which modern scientific research is performed, seeks to prevent personal and professional biases from corrupting the scientific process. This method typically employs the following steps: (1) conducting research and making an observation, (2) forming a hypothesis, (3) performing an experiment, (4) recording and analyzing the data, and (5) drawing an evidence-based conclusion. In addition, a neutral party must be able to repeat the same process using the same methods and duplicate the original results. This method helps ensure that scientists remain objective in their research and do not consciously or unconsciously distort or force inaccurate scientific conclusions on the results of their experiments.
Background
This concept of scientific objectivity became prominent in the early nineteenth century as the scientific method was honed and research technology and methods were advanced. Before this time, scientists and naturalists sought to make genuine discoveries through studying the natural world. To capture the stages of their scientific research and observations, they created artistic representations; however, their methods tended to be based on the perspective of the researcher and did not always authentically depict the observations being made.
The development of photographic camera technology in the nineteenth century helped usher in a new era of scientific objectivity, as visual observations could be accurately recorded instead of interpreted through works of art such as drawings. In the twentieth century, the objective scientific method was further complemented by the standardized use of technological data and images that could be interpreted for many purposes in a variety of professions.
Overview
Scientists employ several different strategies to keep their work accurate and free of conscious or unconscious personal influence. These strategies typically include crafting an unambiguous hypothesis, ensuring that both the experimenter and the participant are unaware of who belongs to the control group and who belongs to the test group, testing a large sample, and having qualified third-party professionals analyze the results.
An additional way scientists endeavor to remain objective in their work is by using standard units and tools for measurements of quantities such as length, weight, distance, and time. Standardized tools may include rulers, thermometers, calipers, scales, and electrometers. Using standard equipment accepted by one’s discipline or field of study helps eliminate the possible discrepancies that could arise from multiple scientists performing the same or similar research with differently calibrated tools. Measurements are expressed using a standard system, typically the International System of Units (SI), allowing scientists across multiple nations and disciplines to comprehend the results and repeat the scientific process, hopefully achieving the same results. This practice is employed in the science classroom for students at all levels as well. An instructor will give students a set of standard materials in a laboratory environment and ask the students to perform a certain set of steps to conduct an experiment and reach a specific result, cultivating a dedication to unbiased procedures.
The verification of scientific research is often carried out in the form of peer reviews, where members of the same or similar disciplines or fields of study analyze and comment on one another’s findings and conclusions. These reviews are conducted in a variety of ways, most often as part of the submission process for academic journals, in which several other scientists read and evaluate the scientific process and methods used before the journal accepts and circulates the conclusions. This requirement can also be met through presentations at various scientific symposia and forums, where members of similar disciplines can directly question the researchers about their process and results. The scientific community publishes thousands of peer-reviewed academic journals and regularly holds dedicated conferences where this information can be presented and reviewed by fellow experts in the appropriate field, with each specific discipline having a variety of dedicated journals in which scientists can share their findings. Academic journals are not the same as scientific magazines, which also publish articles on scientific results; the intent of an academic journal is to provide a forum for peer-reviewed materials, while the scientific magazine provides an independent overview of ongoing scientific news and research.
The scientist’s ability to remove himself or herself from an experiment or research, and the very possibility of objectivity in general, has been widely debated over the years, but those involved in the scientific community believe that objectivity should be the foundation of the research they conduct. Regardless of the specific discipline, scientific objectivity demands that researchers employ a repeatable experimentation process that can be used to verify the authenticity and value of the scientific research and studies being performed.
Bibliography
Ackermann, Robert John. Data, Instruments, and Theory: A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1985. Print.
Agazzi, Evandro. Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts. Cham: Springer, 2014. Print.
Becker, S. "Science May Be Objective, Scientists Are Not Always." Facts, Views, & Vision, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 31 Mar. 2021, doi.org/10.52054%2FFVVO.13.1.012. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
Couvalis, George. The Philosophy of Science: Science and Objectivity. London: Sage, 1997. Print.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. Objectivity. 2007. New York: Zone, 2010. Print.
Gauch, Hugh G., Jr. Scientific Method in Brief. New York: Cambridge UP, 2012. Print.
Hofmann, Angelika H. Scientific Writing and Communication: Papers, Proposals, and Presentations. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2014. Print.
Roessler, Johannes, Hemdat Lerman, and Naomi Eilan, eds. Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. New York: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.
Stamenkovic,. Philippe. "Facts and Objectivity in Science." Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2023, doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807. Accessed 21 Nov. 2024.
Vaughan, Simon. Scientific Inference: Learning from Data. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2013. Print.