Viktor Petrovich Kliushnikov

Writer

  • Born: March 10, 1841
  • Birthplace: Aleksianovka, Smolensk, Russia
  • Died: November 7, 1892
  • Place of death: Russia

Biography

Viktor Petrovich Kliushnikov was born on March 10, 1841, in Aleksianovka, in the Smolensk region in central Russia. Born into the aristocracy—his father was nobility and had earned a medical degree—Kliushnikov received an education appropriate to his station. He was educated at home before attending private school in St. Petersburg, where he was exposed to European culture and to the serious literature of his day. He graduated from Moscow University in 1861 with a degree in natural sciences, intent on following his father into the medical profession.

However, after graduation he was uninterested in commencing a medical practice and remained in Moscow, where he secured a low-level job with the state bureaucracy and would teach for a stint. Kliushnikov lived with an uncle who had been a minor poet a generation earlier and was one of the intellectual elite who met in the salons around Moscow University, a gathering place for liberal intellectuals versed in European thought and eager to develop an indigenous culture amid what they perceived to be Russia’s intellectual impoverishment. Although his uncle was past his own literary aspirations, the young Kliushnikov keenly felt his influence.

Kliushnikov circulated poems and essays among Moscow’s intellectuals, experimented briefly with acting, and eventually began writing his first long work, published with the considerable assistance of his uncle as a two-volume novel, Marevo, in 1864. Set against the recent catastrophic people’s uprising in Poland against Russian occupation, the novel portrayed the Polish citizenry as misguided nihilists whose insidious gospel fomented violence between peasants and landowners and in turn threatened the economic and moral well-being of Russia. Kliushnikov’s conservative sensibility, his ringing endorsement of Russian occupation as a solution to Poland’s internal issues, and his prose style uncluttered by literary ornamentation appealed to some readers. However, the novel, not surprisingly, received a generally hostile reception among the critical press who dismissed the massive book as meandering and too dominated by philosophical discourse. In his mid-twenties, however, Kliushnikov became a national literary figure, a steadying voice balancing the radical manifestoes of his generation.

Kliushnikov accepted a position at a prestigious Moscow journal and later a similar post in St. Petersburg. He continued to write novels off and on but avoided contemporary issues. Instead, his focus turned toward anatomizing relationships between the sexes. However, Kliushnikov’s arguments about sexual relations drew heavily from borrowed sources, and his narratives suffered from his cavalier sense of structuring, his clumsy handling of character and scene, and his conservative agenda. Kliushnikov slipped into obscurity, making a name for himself through his work as an editor, where he sought and supported the work of the emerging generation of Russian intellectuals, and through his translations of major European novelists, notably Charles Dickens. He died on November 7, 1892, largely forgotten.

Kliushnikov was a writer whose published credo defined the best literature as simple and cheerful, lyrical and unpretentious. He avoided the incendiary political and social issues of his generation by adopting a conservative stance that never found favor with the critical establishment. In an era defined by Russia’s emerging liberal sensibility and spiritual explorations, Kliushnikov represents a significant counterargument.