Amnesty
Amnesty refers to a governmental act that grants immunity from prosecution to specific groups of people for designated offenses, often based on political considerations. The term originates from a Greek word meaning "oblivion," highlighting the act's nature of allowing society to "forget" certain offenses. Unlike pardons, which are typically granted post-conviction, amnesties are usually offered before prosecution occurs. This process is often seen in contexts where societal reconciliation is needed, such as post-conflict situations or in response to civil unrest. In the United States, the authority to grant amnesty resides primarily with the president and governors, with constitutional backing for both federal and state actions. Historical examples include President Gerald Ford’s amnesty for draft evaders following the Vietnam War, aimed at fostering national healing. However, the practice remains controversial and can provoke significant debate regarding justice, accountability, and political motivations. Overall, amnesty serves as a complex tool for governments seeking to navigate the challenges of societal divisions and historical grievances.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Amnesty
SIGNIFICANCE: Often based on political considerations, the granting of amnesty is often controversial.
Amnesty is a government action that grants immunity from prosecution to an identified group of people for a specified criminal offense. The term is derived from the Greek word meaning “oblivion,” which is appropriate, because amnesty involves the “forgetting” of an offense. Although accused individuals do not have to exchange information or testimony to receive amnesty, they are expected to abide by all laws in the future. In some cases grants of amnesty are conditional, requiring a loyalty oath or community service. The difference between amnesties and pardons is not well defined, but amnesties are typically granted to persons before prosecution has taken place, while pardons are usually granted to persons after their trial and conviction.
In the United States the power to grant amnesty usually resides in the chief executive. Governors usually possess the power to grant amnesties for violations of state law. At the federal level, both the president and Congress can grant amnesties. The president’s authority derives from Article II, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives the president the “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in cases of Impeachment.” Congress may grant amnesties under the terms of the “necessary and proper” clause found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The U.S. Congress does not have the power to limit or place conditions on any presidential amnesties.
Presidents have generally granted amnesties in situations involving actions undertaken in protest against government policies. In 1795 President George Washington granted amnesty to participants in the Whiskey Rebellion , which was essentially a revolt against excise taxes. In 1865 President Andrew Johnson offered most ex-Confederates amnesty if they agreed to take a loyalty oath to the Union. These examples reveal the intent behind most amnesties: to end divisive conflicts within American society in order to achieve reconciliation and domestic tranquillity.
President Gerald R. Ford’s 1974 decision to offer amnesty to individuals who had refused to serve in the Vietnam War illustrated both the confusion surrounding the meaning of the term “amnesty” and the political calculations involved in granting it. As late as March, 1974, Ford declared that draft evaders had to be tried in the nation’s courts. However, upon succeeding President Richard M. Nixon as president the following August, Ford was advised by his cabinet officers that an amnesty program would speed the nation’s recovery from the war. In addition, the American public would regard Ford as a conciliator, which would improve his political standing. Later that same month, Ford announced that draft evaders would have the opportunity to earn their reentry into American society. He called his proposal clemency rather than amnesty on the grounds that draft evaders would be required to perform some form of alternative nonmilitary service to the nation. Ford’s action, commonly regarded as an example of conditional amnesty, was intended to appease Americans who opposed the unconditional pardon of persons who refused to perform military service during the Vietnam War.
Bibliography
Davis, John Martin, and George B. Tremmel. Parole, Pardon, Pass and Amnesty Documents of the Civil War : An Illustrated History. Jefferson: McFarland, 2013. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 23 May 2016.
Elbaum, Jack. "The Problem with Declaring a 'Pandemic Amnesty.'" Foundation for Economic Education, 7 Nov. 2022, fee.org/articles/the-problem-with-declaring-a-pandemic-amnesty/. Accessed 19 June 2024.
Freeman, Mark. Necessary Evils : Amnesties and the Search for Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 23 May 2016.
Gecker, Jocelyn. "College Protestors Want 'Amnesty.' At Stake: Tuition, Legal Charges, Grades and Graduation." Assoicated Press, 28 Apr. 2024, apnews.com/article/student-protest-gaza-war-arrest-amnesty-ae235703d6a9b99114078fca13a530a0. Accessed 19 June 2024.
Gioglio, Gerald. Days of Decision: An Oral History of Conscientious Objectors in the Military During the Vietnam War. Trenton: Broken Rifle, 1989. Print
Levi, Margaret. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. New York: Cambridge UP, 1997. Print.
Moore, Kathleen Dean. Pardons: Justice, Mercy and the Public Interest. New York: Oxford UP, 1989. Print.