Speedy trial right
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. legal system, enshrined in the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees that individuals accused of crimes should not face undue delays in their prosecution. This right was extended to state trials through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967). The significance of a speedy trial lies in its ability to prevent prolonged uncertainty for the accused, which can disrupt their lives, including job security and personal reputations. Delays can also hinder the ability of defendants to mount an effective defense, and they may inadvertently favor the prosecution in plea negotiations.
The definition of a "speedy trial" is somewhat ambiguous, and the Supreme Court has provided criteria to evaluate whether a delay is justifiable. In Barker v. Wingo (1972), the Court identified factors such as the length of the delay, reasons behind it, the defendant's assertion of their right, and any prejudice experienced. To further regulate this process, the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 was enacted, mandating that federal cases be tried within 100 days of arrest. However, the implementation of this act faced challenges due to a backlog in federal courts, highlighting ongoing issues within the judicial system regarding timely trials. Overall, the right to a speedy trial remains a critical safeguard in protecting the legal rights of individuals accused of crimes.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Speedy trial right
SIGNIFICANCE: The constitutional guarantee that accused persons have the right to a speedy trial is one of the fundamental features of U.S. constitutional law.
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial. Applying the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967) that this right applies to state trials as well. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote that “the right to a speedy trial is as fundamental as any of the rights secured by the Sixth Amendment,” and like the right to counsel, he reasoned, it should also be applied to the states.
Not only do trial delays create an enormous backlog of cases that clog the judicial system, but they also make it difficult for the accused to present an adequate defense. Even if the accused person is free on bail, employment may be disrupted, reputations harmed, and financial resources depleted.
Delay is a common defense tactic, because there are many instances in which delay favors the accused. Most often it puts pressure on the prosecution to make concessions. To avoid a lengthy trial a prosecutor may offer to reduce the charges against a defendant in return for a guilty plea. There is also the danger that a person on bail awaiting trial may commit other crimes or forfeit bail.
The term “speedy trial” is vague at best, and over the years the U.S. Supreme Court has attempted to clarify its meaning. In Barker v. Wingo (1972) the Court stated that the factors to be considered in determining whether a delay is justified are, generally, the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant’s claim to the right to a speedy trial, and prejudice toward the defendant. In Barker a delay of five and a half years caused by sixteen state-requested continuances was allowed because of the need to convict a codefendant before proceeding against the accused and because of the illness of the chief investigating officer. When Willie Barker was eventually brought to trial, he was convicted and given a life sentence. The Court held that since the defendant did not ask for a speedy trial and did not assert that his right had been violated until three years after his arrest, he had not been deprived of his due process right to a speedy trial.
Most states have statutes that fix the period of time during which an accused must be brought to trial. In addition, to ensure that a person’s trial in a federal court not be unduly delayed or that a suspect not be held in custody indefinitely, the U.S. Congress passed the Speedy Trial Act of 1974. According to this act, which was supposed to go into effect by 1979, federal cases had to be brought to trial within one hundred days of a person’s arrest. If cases were not tried within this period, federal prosecutors faced the possibility that their charges against defendants would be dismissed. Despite the planned five-year delay in the implementation of the Speedy Trial Act, the federal courts were backlogged with cases to such an extent that Congress was forced to postpone its implementation indefinitely.
Bibliography
Campbell, Andrea. Rights of the Accused. Philadelphia: Chelsea House, 2001.
Garcia, Alfredo. The Sixth Amendment in Modern American Jurisprudence. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.
Lewis, Thomas T., ed. The Bill of Rights. 2 vols. Pasadena, Calif.: Salem Press, 2002.
"Sixth Amendment." Cornell Law School, www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/sixth‗amendment. Accessed 10 July 2024.
Smith, Christopher E. Courts and Trials: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio, 2003.
"The Right to a Speedy Trial in a Criminal Law Case." Justia, Oct. 2023, www.justia.com/criminal/procedure/right-to-a-speedy-trial/. Accessed 10 July 2024.