Slander

Definition: False or defamatory speaking that injures another party

Significance: The victim of slander may seek, in court, compensation for injury sustained as a result of slander, but the First Amendment limits to some extent the availability of this remedy, especially when the victim is a public figure

Slander is the oral twin of its written sibling, libel. Both are defamations that falsely or maliciously injure another. Prior to the 1960s, slander was widely viewed as posing no constitutional issue regarding freedom of speech. Nevertheless, the possibility of obtaining damages for allegedly injurious spoken or written words inevitably has a dampening effect on free expression. Accordingly, beginning with the 1964 decision of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court has viewed defamation actions—whether for slander or for libel—as raising First Amendment issues. In the New York Times case, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prevented a public official from recovering damages for slander or libel unless the official demonstrated that a defamatory falsehood been made with actual malice—that is, with actual knowledge that a defamation was false or with reckless indifference to whether it was false or not. The Court has subsequently held that private individuals may in some circumstances be treated like public officials with respect to defamation, if they are famous or notorious or have somehow thrust themselves forward in the public eye.

As a candidate in 2016, President Donald Trump promised to change defamation laws in order to make it easier to bring lawsuits against news media organizations, publishers, and journalists. After the election, he walked back his promise during an interview with editors and writers at the New York Times, saying he might personally be in trouble if the laws were loosened. He renewed the pledge in January 2018, when he called US libel laws a “sham and a disgrace” after his personal lawyer filed a lawsuit against BuzzFeed News regarding an intelligence dossier that allegedly described Russian efforts to aid the Trump campaign. Legal experts indicate that the president may have little direct power to change defamation laws, whether at the federal or state level.

102082432-101764.jpg102082432-101764.jpgrrc-rs-160044-189390.jpg

Bibliography

Grynbaum, Michael M. “Trump Renews Pledge to ‘Take a Strong Look’ at Libel Laws.” The New York Times, 10 Jan. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/01/10/business/media/trump-libel-laws.html. Accessed 7 May 2018.

Kenyon, A. Defamation: Comparative Law and Practice, UCL Press, 2013. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=355292&site=ehost-live. Accessed 7 May. 2018.

Levine, Lee, and Stephen Wermiel. The Progeny: Justice William J. Brennan’s Fight to Preserve the Legacy of New York Times v. Sullivan. American Bar Association, 2011. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=760428&site=ehost-live. Accessed 7 May. 2018.

Porterfield, Jason. Freedom of Speech or Defamation?: Expressing Yourself on the Web. Rosen Publishing Group, Inc., 2013. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=618331&site=ehost-live. Accessed 7 May. 2018.

Wilkie, Christina. “Trump Wants to Make It Easier to Sue the Media, but That Almost Definitely Won’t Happen.” CNBC, 11 Jan. 2018, www.cnbc.com/2018/01/10/trump-wants-to-change-libel-law-experts-say-theres-nothing-he-can-do.html. Accessed 7 May. 2018.