Social impact assessment (SIA)
Social impact assessment (SIA) is a systematic approach used to evaluate the effects of social interventions and developments on populations, focusing on their everyday lives, work, and overall well-being. It aims to understand the consequences of planned social-change processes, including government policies and programs, by monitoring and managing their outcomes. SIA seeks to highlight positive effects while addressing and mitigating any negative impacts, ultimately striving to maximize the social return on investments.
Originating from the environmental impact assessment (EIA) model, which emerged in the 1970s, SIA draws parallels in assessing the effects of policies on people rather than the environment. The assessment process occurs at various levels—local, state, or national—and employs a framework for decision-making regarding social issues such as homelessness, poverty, and education. An SIA typically consists of three main components: defining the intervention's value, quantifying measurable social-impact indicators, and tracking these indicators to evaluate consequences over time. The professionals involved in conducting SIAs come from diverse fields such as sociology, political science, and anthropology, contributing a rich array of perspectives to the assessment process.
On this Page
Subject Terms
Social impact assessment (SIA)
Social impact assessment, usually shortened to SIA, is a model for examining the effects of social interventions and developments. SIA looks at the consequences of planned social-change processes, which include government and social policies, plans, and programs, by monitoring and managing them to determine their outcomes. The assessment also identifies and addresses potential issues and offers strategies to mitigate problems, with the overall goal of maximizing social return on investments.
Overview
Social impact refers to the effect of the actions of public and private bodies on populations in terms of their everyday lives, work, and well-being. These effects can alter social norms, values, and lifestyles. SIA evaluates these interventions, looking to expand on their positive effects and offset any negative effects while also determining their overall value, with the goal of continuing to develop and improve policy. SIA can occur at the local, state, or national level.
The impact-assessment process originated from the environmental impact assessment (EIA) model, which began to be used in the 1970s to analyze the possible effects of a particular action on the environment. The outcome of the EIA determined whether or not a project would go forward and what potential changes would be necessary. SIA follows this same model, but instead of the effects of policy on the environment, it looks at the effects on the population. EIA and SIA are occasionally conducted concurrently.
SIA methodology is based on the idea that interventions have effects and consequences. Those in a position to affect interventions must therefore have a way to assess whether they are successful or not and be able to adapt them to account for any ramifications. SIA provides a framework for decision making when it comes to these interventions and initiatives, which may address a range of different social issues, including homelessness, hunger, housing, poverty, violence, and education.
Generally, an SIA is made up of three parts. The first part involves the definition of the intervention’s value and a determination of how it will get results. The second part is the quantification of the outcomes, which is done by noting measurable social-impact indicators. The third part is the tracking of the indicators to measure and evaluate their consequences. The personnel who conduct these three elements of SIA may be practitioners in various fields of social science, including sociology, political science, public policy, anthropology, human development, and geography.
Bibliography
Asselin, Jodie, and John R. Parkins. “Comparative Case Study as Social Impact Assessment: Possibilities and Limitations for Anticipating Social Change in the Far North.” Social Indicators Research 94.3 (2009): 483–97. Print.
Bloch, Barbara. “Everyone’s Story Counts: Measuring Social Impact in the Not-for-Profit Sector—An Overview.” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4.3 (2012): 1–17. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.
Cheung, Chau-kiu. “Public Policies That Help Foster Social Inclusion.” Social Indicators Research 112.1 (2013): 47–68. Print.
Esteves, Ana Maria, and Mary-Anne Barclay. “Enhancing the Benefits of Local Content: Integrating Social and Economic Impact Assessment into Procurement Strategies.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 29.3 (2011): 205–15. Print.
Lewis, Melinda L., Diane L. Scott, and Carol Calfee. “Rural Social Service Disparities and Creative Social Work Solutions for Rural Families across the Life Span.” Journal of Family Social Work 16.1 (2013): 101–15. Print.
Rowan, Marielle. “Refining the Attribution of Significance in Social Impact Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 27.3 (2009): 185–91. Print.
Spaapen, Jack, and Leonie van Drooge. “Introducing ‘Productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment.” Research Evaluation 20.3 (2011): 211–18. Print.
Tajziehchi, Sanaz, Seyed Masoud Monavari, and Abdulreza Karbassi. “An Effective Participatory-Based Method for Dam Social Impact Assessment.” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 21.6 (2012): 1841–48. Print.