Soft and Hard power
In international relations, "soft power" and "hard power" represent two distinct approaches that countries utilize to influence one another. Soft power refers to a nation's ability to attract and persuade others through culture, political values, and foreign policies, fostering a sense of admiration and shared objectives. Hard power, on the other hand, involves coercive tactics, using military force or economic incentives and sanctions to compel compliance from other nations.
The concept of smart power emerges from the effective combination of both soft and hard power strategies, allowing countries to leverage their strengths in a complementary manner. Joseph S. Nye Jr., an influential political scientist, emphasizes that successful international strategies often require a balance between these forms of power. While hard power can achieve immediate results, it may also lead to backlash or resentment, whereas soft power can cultivate long-term relationships and shared values.
Countries must navigate the complexities of these strategies to address global challenges such as trade, security, and climate change. By employing smart power, nations can enhance their influence and foster cooperation on pressing international issues, recognizing that an integrated approach is essential for effective diplomacy and global engagement.
On this Page
Soft and Hard power
In international relations, soft and hard power are the forms of influence that a country utilizes in dealing with other nations. Soft power is a persuasive approach, and hard power is a coercive approach.
Soft power is the capacity of a country to get what it wants by endearing itself to other nations through attraction. A nation cultivates its appeal through the resources of culture, political ideals, and foreign policies.
Hard power is the ability of a country to obtain the outcomes it wants by compelling other nations through economic and military might. Its instruments are inducements, such as payoffs, and threats, including economic sanctions and military force, to ensure compliance.
The combination of a country's soft and hard power strategies in a way that allows one to reinforce the other is referred to as smart power. The most effective strategies in international relations involve a mix of soft and hard power.
Background
Power is the might that countries wield over other nations and political groups to control their behavior. A country builds power—economic, military, and political—through its size, resources, and capabilities. Nations will use their power to get other countries to side with them in achieving their interests. This can include the outcomes in relation to pressing international issues, including trade agreements, the war on terrorism, the spread of diseases, and climate change.
Countries can affect the actions of other nations and groups through hard power and soft power strategies. Nations who use hard power rely on inspiring fear. Stronger countries will use economic and military incentives to coerce countries that are less powerful in those areas. The authoritative countries usually force the weaker nations to adopt a position they do not want. Foreign policy scholar Joseph S. Nye describes the inducements a country uses to exert influence under hard power as "carrots" and the threats as "sticks."
Countries who use soft power rely on earning admiration. Soft power, which was coined by Nye in 1990, indirectly influences other nations to want the same objectives. Countries use soft power to display their preferences—for example, democracy and free trade—and make them attractive. In turn, they persuade other countries to share those preferences. Countries do not have to dangle carrots and sticks when they can convince other nations to adopt their goals.
Hard and soft power strategies are not interchangeable. Soft power is not a viable alternative for economic and military might. Hard power is often employed by nations that are protective of their independence, countries fighting the war on terror, and terrorist groups inclined to violence. However, soft power is gaining prominence as a tool in combatting terror groups' recruitment methods. The latter can also entice nations to support issues that benefit from multinational collaboration.
Overview
Countries use a variety of instruments and resources to carry out hard power and soft power strategies. A nation exercises hard power tactics by flexing its economic and military muscle through inducements and threats. A country can induce another to change its position by offering economic incentives. The country may propose reducing trade barriers or easing economic sanctions. A country may offer payments or bribes to the other country. The more powerful country can afford to do so because of its economic might. The coercive country may induce another nation to switch its position by touting its military strength. The country may offer to provide military backing to the other nation if it supports its agenda.
If inducements are the carrots, then threats are the sticks. Countries can threaten other nations to go along with them through economic-based punishments. The more powerful nation can impose trade restrictions and economic sanctions, both of which could have devastating effects on the weaker country's economy. An authoritative country can threaten to use military force against another nation to force it to fall in line. Modern examples of hard power include the United States' economic embargo against communist Cuba in the 1960s and America's invasion of Iraq in 2003 to depose dictator Saddam Hussein.
Soft power operates through the resources of culture, political ideals, and foreign policies. A nation can use its culture to boost the attractiveness of its stances to other countries. Culture consists of a country's values, ideals, and social practices, including its popular culture. Movies about a nation's ideals may be more persuasive than an ambassador's speech. A nation's political ideals can also influence other countries to follow its will. When a country has universal ideals, such as freedom and human rights, it becomes more attractive to other countries, which are more likely to support its goals. A country can count on its foreign policies to encourage others to back its positions. The style and substance of foreign policies convey and promote a country's values. Broad-minded policies and forward-looking objectives appear more appealing to other countries than narrow-minded and nearsighted views.
Modern examples of soft power include President Franklin Roosevelt's four freedoms, including the freedoms of speech and worship and the freedoms from want and fear, in Europe after World War II and President Jimmy Carter's policies to advance human rights.
Limitations to hard and soft power do exist. Hard power tactics can backfire and weaken a country's influence. Some countries may only respond to hard power strategies and fail to acknowledge soft power.
Another type of power has grown from combining the elements of hard and soft power. Smart power integrates a country's economic and military strength with an increased investment in diplomacy. Countries can most effectively wield their influence through a mixture of hard and soft power tactics. Focusing on developing one form over the other is insufficient. Nations have to continue building their militaries and maintaining their economic prestige while working to form relationships and alliances with other countries. Nations are more likely to sway other countries to their side by utilizing both types of power.
Nations have soft and hard power strategies at their disposal when dealing with other nations. As countries blend soft and hard power to achieve their goals, smart power may become the strategy of choice in the future of international relations.
Bibliography
Fitzpatrick, Kathy R. The Future of U.S. Public Diplomacy: An Uncertain Fate. Brill, 2010.
Gallarotti, Giulio M. Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations: A Synthesis of Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Gray, Colin S. Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century. US Army War College Press, 2011.
Huntington, Samuel P. "The Erosion of American National Interest." Diversity and U.S. Foreign Policy: A Reader, edited by Ernest J. Wilson III, Routledge, 2004.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. Basic Books, 1990.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs, 2004.
Nye, Joseph S., Jr. "Soft Power and European-American Affairs." Hard Power, Soft Power and the Future of Transatlantic Relations, edited by Thomas L. Ilgen, Routledge, 2016, pp. 25–38.