Jalāyirid School (painting)
The Jalāyirid School of painting, active from 1336 to 1432, emerged in Baghdad and is known for its distinctive miniature paintings, primarily manuscript illuminations. This school arose during the Jalāyirid sultanate, a period marked by relative stability and cultural flourishing amidst the turbulence of Mongol invasions. Unlike previous Persian artistic traditions that focused on grand historical narratives, Jalāyirid painters emphasized the vibrant details of everyday life, portraying scenes of music, leisure, and nature with a notable sense of realism and intimacy.
The Jalāyirid School innovated by integrating perspective into their artwork, allowing for a more dynamic representation of space and depth. They broke from the norm of generic figures, opting instead for individual characters with expressive features and gestures, which contributed to a lively sense of motion in their compositions. Their use of a broader color palette further enhanced the vividness of their subjects, capturing intricate details of clothing and settings.
Despite its brief existence, the Jalāyirid School left a lasting impact on Persian miniature art, establishing a legacy that reflects both the cultural richness of its time and the innovative spirit of its artists. Today, these miniatures are celebrated as significant contributions to the visual heritage of the Persian Empire.
On this Page
Jalāyirid School (painting)
The Jalāyirid school, despite lasting barely a century (1336–1432) and centered largely in the sultanate courts of a single city, Baghdad, came to define a particularly refined kind of miniature painting, for the most part manuscript illuminations. It introduced into a Persian painting tradition descended from the warrior Mongols, who had used painting to celebrate the epic and the heroic, a relish for the colorful and lyric expression of the everyday. Although the Persians, despite their historic reputation for fierce fighting and centuries of bloody warfare, were keen to define their empire through grand building projects and ambitious architectural feats, they also celebrated the more modest arts of music, poetry, and ornament. The grander expressions of inlaid jewel work and mosaic murals are for the most part lost, but examples of the Jalāyirid school miniature have survived more than eight centuries and are among the defining visual genres of the Persian empire.
Brief History
The swift rise and precipitous collapse of the Jalāyirid school of painting was tied to the military conquests and political fortunes of its era. The Jalairs were an invading Mongol tribe, descendants by tradition of the great Genghis Khan, the legendary warrior king of the thirteenth century. As part of their massive and brutal invasion of the Middle East, much of the city of Baghdad, a leading cultural and commercial center, was destroyed. The establishment of Mongol rule then ushered in a long period of nearly continuous turmoil—decades of fierce military engagements between the Mongols and the indigenous tribes as well as internecine conflicts among the Mongol invaders themselves. The sultanate established in Baghdad, however, was a glorious exception. Under the Jalāyirid sultanate, the region enjoyed a period of relative political and military stability under the rule of Sheik Uways (1356–1374). During that suzerainty, Baghdad reemerged as a major trading center and, given the Sheik’s patronage of the arts, a flourishing center for not only painting but also lyric poetry and romantic music. Painting, long a tradition that had been expressed on walls or in the medium of textiles, had only begun to discover the implications and possibilities of paper, introduced by the Chinese invaders less than a century earlier.
The court supported a tight matrix of art schools and master studios and invited the most gifted painters from the region. Collectively, these artisans developed an approach to painting that sought to capture not the grand and epical stories of military exploits drawn from history typical of manuscript illustrations of its time but rather the day-to-day life and interests of the court. Because these painters worked from observation and because they strove to capture the world all around them, the Jalāyirid school developed groundbreaking techniques for capturing perspective, that is, creating the illusion of depth and space in a painting in an effort to recreate on paper how the eye actually recorded the world. It was a revolutionary approach to painting. But the suzerainty proved to be a fragile period. Baghdad was sacked in 1401 by a rival Mongol tribe and before falling to invading Turkish armies in 1432.
Overview
To understand the impact of the Jalāyirid school is to first appreciate the long tradition of Persian manuscript illuminators that it inherited. Manuscript illuminations were seen as a way to engage readers of texts by providing rich visual commentary to the text (sometimes the religious texts of Islam but far more often epic poems of grand historic events from Mongol military history or stylized parables intended to offer wisdom). These illuminations were designed to encourage reading. Because these illustrations were drawn from history or were centered on generic figures (the faithful husband, the industrious wife, or the lazy child) the figures were themselves generic. A figure would be drawn from the bottom of the frame to the top, thus minimizing any sense of depth or even the illusion of background. They looked like exactly like what they were: pictures.
The Jalāyirid school introduced two radical dimensions to miniature painting: the use of a broad and reaching background and the use of individual rather than stylized figures. By introducing a plane behind the dominant plane of visual perception, most often landscapes or buildings, the painters could actually stack figures, making each layer a degree smaller, creating the feel of recessive vision. That illusion created, in turn, a feeling of animation and lively motion apart from the dominant figure and, in turn, created paintings that could teem with a variety of people. Crowd scenes, after all, were virtually impossible without some degree of perspective. Despite the larger Islamic prohibitions against painting the human form, here because these books were designed not for public display but for private libraries and limited viewing, the painters discovered the possibility of creating individual characters using the visual arts. The Jalāyirid painters introduced a wider range of brilliant colors to capture the world. The characters themselves were gifted with expressive features and idiosyncratic gestures that gave Jalāyirid paintings a level of realism (and intimacy) unprecedented in miniature art. Because these paintings were used to adorn manuscripts of lyric poetry about nature or romantic verses, artists drew on details from the real world. Subjects were people enjoying music, strolling in gardens, bathing, or riding horses. And everything from the fruit on plates to the colors of their clothing recreated the immediate world in striking detail—all captured with painstaking care demanded by work on a surface most often less than the size of a standard sheet of typing paper.
Bibliography
Adamova, Adel T., and Manijeh Bayani. Persian Painting: The Arts of Book and Portraiture. London: Thames, 2015. Print.
Canby, Sheila. Persian Painting. North Hampton: Interlink, 2004. Print.
---. The Shahnama of Shah Tahmasp: The Persian Book of Kings. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2014. Print.
Curatola, Giovanni, and Gianroberto Scarcia. The Art and Architecture of Persia. New York: Abbeville, 2007. Print.
Komaroff, Linda, and Stefano Carboni. The Legacy of Genghis Khan: Courtly Culture in Western Asia, 1256–1353. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2002. Print.
Loukonine, Vladimir, and Anatoli Ivanov. Persian Miniatures. New York: Parkstone, 2014. Print.
Stierlin, Henri. Persian Art and Architecture. London: Thames, 2012. Print.
Welch, Stuart Cary. Persian Painting. New York: Braziller, 1996. Print.